Prager University: If Good and Evil Exist, God Exists

Is there such a thing as objective morality? If there is, does that suggest a moral law giver? Peter Kreeft, distinguished Professor of Philosophy at Boston ...

Comment

You need to be a member of Art of Manliness to add comments!

Join Art of Manliness

Comment by Alan Johnson on December 23, 2012 at 7:22pm

Thanks for viewing, commenting and having an open mind!

Merry Christmas!

Comment by Will on December 23, 2012 at 6:39pm

I think he's nailed it on evolution, conscience, and human nature.  Although I agree with him about reason, he didn't prove his point, but asserted it.  (It's possible that the reasoning of wicked men is flawed reasoning.  I don't think so, but some wise people -- Plato, Aristotle, Socrates -- did.)

Not sure about utilitarianism.

I would like to hear more about the "since it isn't that..." bit.  Sure, since right and wrong are not physical characteristics, they are outside physical reality.  Certainly:  they are abstractions.  I don't know if abstractions are supernatural.

"If there is a moral command, there must be a moral commander":  sounds logical, but I want to hear more of why.  OK, so it's a 5-minute video.  Credit to Kreeft for a clear explanation in a complex topic.

Thanks for posting; I will have to look at some others in that series.

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"Get back to me when you actually understand the merits of the case."
28 minutes ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"You keep acting like the NSA is the Stasi. Quantum data farm in Bluffdale notwithstanding, I don't think you understand there are real world physical limitations to the abilities you ascribe to the NSA."
30 minutes ago
Jay D replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"Yes, but what does that have to do with what i said?"
45 minutes ago
David E. E., Ed.D. replied to Pope Paul's discussion 10 Rules to Being a Gentleman in 2015
"Point taken."
56 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Pope Paul's discussion 10 Rules to Being a Gentleman in 2015
"Would you consider name calling the work of the man or that of the child? Hulk Childishness belligerent neanderthal"
1 hour ago
David E. E., Ed.D. replied to Pope Paul's discussion 10 Rules to Being a Gentleman in 2015
"I have been deliberating on that idea for some time.  It is why there are very few posts from me.  I am trying to engage in the conversation again."
1 hour ago
Steve Dallas replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"You keep saying the word illegally, but I don't think you even know what you are saying anymore."
1 hour ago
David E. E., Ed.D. replied to Pope Paul's discussion 10 Rules to Being a Gentleman in 2015
"There is a vast chasm between standing up for oneself and being belligerent.  The comments of several men on this site too quickly edge toward childishness rather than manliness. "
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service