outstanding Explanation: Why Israel can't withdraw to its pre '67 borders line - Please Share

Why Israel can't withdraw to its pre '67 borders line - Please Share http://jcpa.org/

Views: 90

Comment by Nick H on December 5, 2012 at 1:43pm

The bit on Jerusalem makes me wonder why they'd bother moving their capital there. I understand the symbolic reasoning but if the makers of this video (and a large number of Israelis) wish to maintain a combative, defensive stance with their Arab neighbours then why push to move their capital to such a target? Tel Aviv is probably a better choice. Heck, Canada built its capital in a swamp far from anything because the Brits didn't want it burned down like Toronto from the South or invaded from the water like Quebec City.

Comment by Ken D Books on December 5, 2012 at 3:44pm

Are you a Christian? Do you read the Bible? You say you understand the symbolic reasoning, but if you are a Christian and you read the Bible, surely you understand it's more than symbolic, much more!

Comment by Nick H on December 5, 2012 at 6:11pm

No. Do tell. Because if you are using the Bible as the reason for defending Israel then you've lost me.

Comment

You need to be a member of Art of Manliness to add comments!

Join Art of Manliness

Latest Activity

Jay D replied to Paul MacAlindin's discussion Privilege is invisible to those who have it
"Uhm i meant that you will rarely see people there who went the same way."
6 minutes ago
David F. replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"Yet what we are seeing is that our youth does learn about both sex and guns from our media any way.  But without the full information to handle either well or safely.   And as with alcohol, sex ends up being part of an imagined right of…"
17 minutes ago
David F. replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"I can see the argument that both sides are pushing their moral vision.  But from experience it is not the education I had.   It was a lot of facts and memorization of various STI/Ds.  Also a video of a birth so you could see exactly…"
27 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Lon R.'s discussion "The Most Objectionable Part of the Bible" in the group Gentlemen Apologists
""There are a lot of other problems teaching faith and faith heritage in modern culture... " This Land Is Mine from Nina Paley on Vimeo."
28 minutes ago
Liam Strain replied to Lon R.'s discussion "The Most Objectionable Part of the Bible" in the group Gentlemen Apologists
"It's not clear to me given the context that the meal was the Jewish mourning meal - Jacob wasn't making it for anyone else (as its traditionally given by neighbors) and there is no mention of a death he is mourning. The contention that it…"
40 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Specs's discussion Yep... I shave the old fashioned way.
"That's only if you don't bother to shop around.  http://www.dorcousa.com/cartridge-refills-men/ "
45 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Alberto's discussion Buying Arrows - Any experienced archers out there?
1 hour ago
Vendetta replied to Specs's discussion Yep... I shave the old fashioned way.
"Its almost comical how much more economical DE razors are than current day razors. "
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service