outstanding Explanation: Why Israel can't withdraw to its pre '67 borders line - Please Share

Why Israel can't withdraw to its pre '67 borders line - Please Share http://jcpa.org/

Views: 96

Comment by Nick H on December 5, 2012 at 1:43pm

The bit on Jerusalem makes me wonder why they'd bother moving their capital there. I understand the symbolic reasoning but if the makers of this video (and a large number of Israelis) wish to maintain a combative, defensive stance with their Arab neighbours then why push to move their capital to such a target? Tel Aviv is probably a better choice. Heck, Canada built its capital in a swamp far from anything because the Brits didn't want it burned down like Toronto from the South or invaded from the water like Quebec City.

Comment by Ken D Books on December 5, 2012 at 3:44pm

Are you a Christian? Do you read the Bible? You say you understand the symbolic reasoning, but if you are a Christian and you read the Bible, surely you understand it's more than symbolic, much more!

Comment by Nick H on December 5, 2012 at 6:11pm

No. Do tell. Because if you are using the Bible as the reason for defending Israel then you've lost me.

Comment

You need to be a member of Art of Manliness to add comments!

Join Art of Manliness

Latest Activity

Clinton R. Ausmus replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"They haven't changed. Shane just doesn't have a clue of what he's talking about. Not surprised..."
43 minutes ago
Coyote commented on Lumpy52403's photo
Thumbnail

PA111826

"Looking good!"
46 minutes ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion Spacefaring civilization in the group The Great Debate
"It hasn't been reorganized yet, so it's likely not enough to start anything off.  Although Zubrin thinks it can be done for a cheap billion."
2 hours ago
Sir replied to Sir's discussion Spacefaring civilization in the group The Great Debate
"They appropriated $19.5 billion on March 7.  http://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-funding-authorization-bill-2017-3  I can well believe it's not enough, because it's not a yuge increase."
2 hours ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"It's been the same argument for two years. Trump doesn't live up 100% to some dystopic scenario detractors have concocted in their own minds, and it's supposed to be an existential crisis for his supporters."
3 hours ago
Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"The problem is believing the caricatures.  Trump keeps saying he's going to renegotiate trade deals (and it looks like he's started).  You don't renegotiate trade deals if you want to eliminate all imports, and he has not…"
3 hours ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"Eh. I used to be fine with them getting their paperwork sorted before they're caught. I'm curently fine with deporting them all to Poland. The situation we have right now is unsustainable. And, the longer we fuck around doing nothing, the…"
3 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"Ah, I misunderstood. I thought you were speaking in ideal terms. But still, what do you think about touchback? I'm ok with it if they spend a good length of time outside the US again, be put through the same process as everyone else, and…"
3 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service