outstanding Explanation: Why Israel can't withdraw to its pre '67 borders line - Please Share

Why Israel can't withdraw to its pre '67 borders line - Please Share http://jcpa.org/

Views: 90

Comment by Nick H on December 5, 2012 at 1:43pm

The bit on Jerusalem makes me wonder why they'd bother moving their capital there. I understand the symbolic reasoning but if the makers of this video (and a large number of Israelis) wish to maintain a combative, defensive stance with their Arab neighbours then why push to move their capital to such a target? Tel Aviv is probably a better choice. Heck, Canada built its capital in a swamp far from anything because the Brits didn't want it burned down like Toronto from the South or invaded from the water like Quebec City.

Comment by Ken D Books on December 5, 2012 at 3:44pm

Are you a Christian? Do you read the Bible? You say you understand the symbolic reasoning, but if you are a Christian and you read the Bible, surely you understand it's more than symbolic, much more!

Comment by Nick H on December 5, 2012 at 6:11pm

No. Do tell. Because if you are using the Bible as the reason for defending Israel then you've lost me.

Comment

You need to be a member of Art of Manliness to add comments!

Join Art of Manliness

Latest Activity

Native Son replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"You are absolutely correct about lack of infrastructure development...however, we tend to get distracted by two things:  the enviros who want to destroy the reservoir that supplies San Francisco and goodly portion of the San Francisco Bay Area…"
12 minutes ago
Native Son replied to Lucas Stickan's discussion Virile Agitur
""Carpe Diem"   and when that doesn't work,  " mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.""
1 hour ago
Native Son replied to Braeden P.D.'s discussion Unpopular Opinions Thread
"JB -- With respect, you left the "s" out of the name of the car.  It's Porsche. Likely lead to the misunderstanding."
1 hour ago
Sir replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"For more on his persuasive abilities, see Scott Adams blog.  Or any Hillary ad."
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Cool"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"All the data says they're not in a drought. Even the article you linked says they're not in a drought."
2 hours ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Your drought ended in September. So you weren't speaking of the state of California then? However, my posts were more in response to the news on Trump telling Californian's they aren't in the midst of a drought, when all the data…"
3 hours ago
David R. replied to John Muir's discussion Lost In Translation
"Through the years I have been involved in bilingual or only-Spanish work-related situations (my native language is English), and in those situations I have found myself thinking in Spanish; I even had dreams in Spanish from time to time."
3 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service