WolvesYou've heard it before.

The old man tells the boy, "I have two wolves inside me. One is angry, and the other is peaceful. They are always in conflict, each pulling me its own way."

"Which one is stronger?" the boy asks.

The old man says, reflectively, "The one I feed."

--

Sounds wise, doesn't it?

But here's the question: have you ever known anyone who successfully starved the anger to death?

I haven't either. The analogy breaks down when you think about what these two wolves are. Each of them is you. You can kill a part of yourself, by suicide (!), but not by deciding not to think about it. How'd not thinking about it work with your appendix? Your broken leg? Your divorce?

Think of the whole system. Those wolves are in conflict. One wants to destroy the world with anger, it says; the other wants it to shut the hell up. But let Peaceful Wolf say "Go ahead," and Angry Wolf will say, "Whoa. I thought you were going to restrain me. What do I do now? We had a deal!"

Instead, give Angry Wolf what it really wants, whatever that is. What's it angry about? Honor? Then honor it. Deprivation? Care for it. A demand for order? Give it some order. In its own space. If it says, "I want to complain and bitch and moan forever," say, "You can have 10 minutes. Bitch and moan all you want." It's sort of like a child: it sees everything in huge terms.

Peaceful Wolf wants to be accepted, to have love and harmony, and its own order. Give it to him.

Bottomless pits stop being bottomless when you give them what they need.

Then Angry Wolf -- or, rather, Protector Wolf -- can rejoice when you take charge; so can Peaceful Wolf.

Views: 302

Comment

You need to be a member of Art of Manliness to add comments!

Join Art of Manliness

Comment by Chris Hamm on December 15, 2009 at 10:48pm
Really nice. I had to slow down and turn the words over a couple times to really get to the bottom of what you were saying. I would say, however, that while you cannot completely starve one wolf it is possible to cage it, weaken it, leash it, however you like to look at it. I think this is what happens to people who bottle anger and deny themselves an outlet for their frustrations. Of course the issue there is the angry wolf will eventually get ravenous enough to chew his own foot out of the trap and unleash hell.

Likewise we all know those people who goad the angry wolf to attack first and ask questions later while keeping the peaceful one in the kennel. My uncle did this and paid the price. He died of a heart attack at 32.

The tension exists for a reason. To deny one wolf what it needs results in a very unhealthy person.
Comment by Cowboy Bob Sorensen on December 15, 2009 at 6:40pm
I see it. We need the tension or conflict within us, because each is a part of us. You cannot deny or eliminate a part of yourself, but you can get it under control, and even work with it. Excellent post.
Comment by Shawn Mcfarland on December 15, 2009 at 4:50pm
Well said.

Latest Activity

Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Just curious if any of you have watched the Vice piece?"
9 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"I haven't done the research, but some may have been done by a renowned sculpturist or something. That would put it at the level of a piece of art IMO. But I haven't done the research.If it was just cast based on some random picture or…"
12 minutes ago
Dominic replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"I didn't see any looting and burning or shutting down cities in Charlottesville. You are conflating your image of one group with an image of another. I did see nazis in polo shirts and tiki torches shouting anti-semitic, nazi slogans, racial…"
14 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"You're right though, the two sides are on different planes. One blocks traffic, loots, burns, and shuts down whole cities. The other wears polo shirts and holds up tiki torches."
18 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Nope. You don't get to manipulate the narrative. They were ancoms."
23 minutes ago
Dominic replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"The anti-nazis were pretty clearly there to be against nazis. To show that white supremacy can't just march through a city without demonstrating that white supremacy is not wanted or welcome. The two sides are not equivalent on any plane at…"
27 minutes ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"The Communists and anarchists used the statue as a reason to gather and engage in class warfare together in a group. I don't see much evidence that they really care about the destruction of statues. And if that is their real goal, there are…"
40 minutes ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Appeal to Authority"
47 minutes ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service