As a transition from conscripts I would like to offer up the next of my proposals on ways to change society for the better. There are currently five federal service academies (West Point, Annapolis, Air Force, Coast Guard, and Merchant Marine), I believe that the federal government could benefit from building a sixth, the United States Civic Service Academy. This four year college would be run similar to the current service academies with some obvious differences:.

Students would apply to this four year school in the same manner as the other service academies - they would need to get an appointment from a congressman, senator, vice president, or president. They would then apply to the school.

The school's faculty would be primarily made up of federal employees who applied to teach - in similar fashion that military officers apply to teach at the other service academies. This would mean that members of NSA would be teaching computer science, members of the FBI would be teaching police administration, former white house staff would be teaching political science. This would give students a very real perspective of what the government needs and has to offer, as well as giving them excellent connection for future endeavors.

Upon graduation, students would be required to work a minimum of 6 years as a federal employee of some capacity.

Dress code would include suit and tie for men and business formal for women.

In place of the normal military duties that cadets at military academies perform, students at this academy would be tasked with weekly community service.

@Dave - didn't make it mandatory, figured I'd let someone else jump in front of that bus.

Views: 10

Tags: Academy, Civic, Employee, Federal, Service, Student, Work

Comment

You need to be a member of Art of Manliness to add comments!

Join Art of Manliness

Comment by Lyle McDonald on February 7, 2010 at 12:46pm
This is a neat idea, though I do take a few issues with it. I like the fact that it would be run in a manner similar to the military-service academies; having an honor code as strict as those for cadets and midshipmen would do a world of good for the future of our government. I'll be a plebe at the Naval Academy next year, and I'm excited that I will be around people who value honor, duty, and service as much as I do.
I think, though, that having the same congressional-nomination procedure that the military-service academies have might interfere with the goal of producing solidly respectable public servants. Remember that the graduates of the USCSA will be bureaucrats and politicians in training, so having the political aspect of admission might introduce conflicts of interest and other unsavory politicking. On that subject, I'm not at all against USNA, USMA, USAFA, and USMMMA removing the nomination requirement, as USCGA has. I understand that it has its benefits, in that it achieves complete geographic representation and that it adds another step to weed out the less-dedicated candidates, but it also prevents the appointment of hundreds of qualified candidates every year.
My other issue with USCSA is that it will train bureaucrats. Bureaucrats...ones who will undoubtedly be more competent, more reliable, and more honorable, but nonetheless bureaucrats.
On the whole, I support the idea of USCSA and am hopeful that within the next decade or so, the public will consider it an important issue.
Comment by Native Son on January 27, 2010 at 11:15pm
A pleasant idea, but seems a bit French, no? I mean like their Ecoles. Two problems with your proposal.
First, there will be a huge donnybrook over who will run the civil service academy.
Second, what you propose sounds on its surface to be a training school for bureaucrats...and now you've just sent every federal legislator either running for cover or adamantly opposed to such an academy on philosophic grounds.

Latest Activity

Augustin replied to Andrew's discussion The History Channel?
"I got interested in history a few years ago only to find the History Channel had fuck all to offer. I usually read books or watch documentaries on YouTube.  "
2 hours ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to Andrew's discussion The History Channel?
"I used to love the History Channel, but it was so long ago (2003-2006) that I stopped watching TV a lot. All I know is : it was a hell of a lot better back then. I'm just dropping my two cents, but I can answer your last question. One of the…"
3 hours ago
Andrew posted discussions
4 hours ago
Mark R replied to Mark R's discussion Very cheap dress watch vs moderately cheap dress watch vs,. no cheap dress watch.
"I learned by shattering watch faces, to loop them through my belt whenever I'm working in tight quarters. FWIW, I went with a $50 Timex (T2E5619J) with a clean design and 3/6/9/12 arabic indices, and a Hadley-Roma padded Kevlar and Lorica band…"
4 hours ago
Bob Brower replied to N Fan's discussion Steering wheel vibration a problem?
"people giving advice without even knowing the year make or model . nowhere in this thread does it give this information.  so how can anyone give advice ?  on top of that nobody here knows if it has factory wheels or aftermarket .  or…"
4 hours ago
Jay D replied to David Johns's discussion Teen boys today
"I still have a hard time understanding how life beeing pointles is a bad thing. If there is no purpose you can choose your own, i find that to be very freeing."
5 hours ago
George Henry Robbins III commented on Bruce Uall's group The Shirtless Man
"Thank you Alejandro."
5 hours ago
Kurt replied to Joseph Robert's discussion Awkward circumstance with my son
"JR, I applaud your transparency, candor and frankness to your son. This experience will be one that he will remember forever, as it obviously brought the two of you closer together. He most likely will feel that he can talk to you about anything,…"
6 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service