A Recent Instance in Which I Was Censored

It was but this morning when a fellow member's blog appeared on the front page. Its title, raising awareness about government regulation in a certain industry, intrigued me, so I clicked, and I read it thoroughly. The post amounted to a lot of slogans without much substance to the actual argument, and therefore I brought up some of these issues in the comment section.

 

The author and I ended up participating in an exchange, which was civil and on the whole rather bloodless, though it was clear that I found some problems in the argument he is trying to present. He was even nice enough to send me a friend request.

 

However, when I signed in a few hours later, I found that my posts had been redacted, censored, and expurgated. Only the blog's author and myself are able to do this. And I didn't do it.

 

So why can't people deal with divergent opinions? Must I be censored simply because I brought up some logical issues in the author's argument? This is not about whether my comments were right or wrong, or whether his position is right or wrong. The question is not whether our opinions and arguments are right or wrong, but can we have reasonably civil dialogue about our opinions and arguments. It is certainly the author's right to limit commentary, but when he does so he forfeits any claim that we the public ought to pay him any attention, respect, or legitimacy. If he doesn't want anyone to comment, he can be alone with his self-made righteousness.

Views: 76

Comment

You need to be a member of Art of Manliness to add comments!

Join Art of Manliness

Comment by Carl Monster on April 4, 2012 at 2:03pm

Funny, disagreement, as scary as it is to me (I don't dare join the Great Debate), is one reason I like this place. I'm on FB, and it gets a bit boring after awhile, all preaching to the choir. As long it it is intelligent, I appreciate hearing another viewpoint. It's how we grow, even if it engenders some anger.

Comment by Vytautas on April 3, 2012 at 5:42pm

Thank you again, Carpe, for your considerate response!

 

Actually, my replies did not make invalid his point. A fact which, I think, makes censorship even more reprehensible because it wasn't like I actually tore his argument apart. I just slightly disagreed with some of his reasoning. And for such a reprehensible little difference in opinion I was rewarded by being cut off!

 

Also, what I am saying here is operating on the normative/intellectual level. I am speaking to how things ought to be. I know that when practical factors come into play, people's behavior is different in reality. But just because censorship is expedient doesn't mean that it is acceptable. It is cowardly and stupid. It reflects poorly on the censor and corrodes the community as a whole.

Latest Activity

Josh Allen replied to Josh Allen's discussion If you can tell me what religion you are then you are in a prison.
"Hi Brad, thanks for your comment I am glad you understood what I was saying unlike so many others on here who just try to attack me. Just as you said it seems like everyone wishes to make fun of me because everyone else is doing it, so many people…"
16 minutes ago
MiCHAEL J K. replied to callum's discussion needing a mentor in the group Manly Mentors
"It is hard being young and married and with a child. As a foster parent and someone who helped raise a brother in law that was having a great deal of problems, I would say find a few or at least one great man close enough to visit from time to…"
20 minutes ago
MiCHAEL J K. joined thehuhman's group
Thumbnail

Manly Mentors

Do you mentor? Have an interest in doing so? Want to connect with others who are making a positive difference in the lives of younger men? Mentoring is not for every man, but if you've felt the call... this is definitely YOUR group!See More
24 minutes ago
John replied to Thomas James's discussion Paying off a large credit card debt vs. settlement? Are there pros? How bad are the cons?
"I am not an expert in how folks do credit ratings, but I would say take the hit. I worked at one of the largest credit card issuers and I can tell you that people settling on accounts at a certain percent is done quite often. However, sometimes they…"
25 minutes ago
MiCHAEL J K. replied to MiCHAEL J K.'s discussion Incest dealing with it years later- may trigger in the group Male Survivors
"I met another male survivor while helping to run a meeting.  He was abused by his step father starting at 3.  We understood with out talking and looks like I found a good friend. "
26 minutes ago
Thomas James posted a discussion

Paying off a large credit card debt vs. settlement? Are there pros? How bad are the cons?

I am going start with the disclaimer: Yes I realize the mistakes I have made to get to this point.As a results of a departure from a job and lifestyle I did not enjoy, and things "not going as well as forecasted" in my early 20s it appears I have accumulated a large debt on a credit card of mine.  The minimum payments are manageable, however don't really get me anywhere, too large of payments are over extending myself since I do have other financial obligations.These obligations are normal ones…See More
33 minutes ago
Charlie joined Andrew's group
Thumbnail

Men with Beards

For men with beards to show and share the great life of having a beard. Can there be anything more manly than a beard?
35 minutes ago
John Muir replied to Stuart Charles's discussion Vegetarian for a Month
"Rinsing beans and not cooking them in the water they soaked in drastically reduces the farting. Also, if you eat them regularly your body deals with it and you don't fart like you do if you only eat them sporadically"
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service