A Recent Instance in Which I Was Censored

It was but this morning when a fellow member's blog appeared on the front page. Its title, raising awareness about government regulation in a certain industry, intrigued me, so I clicked, and I read it thoroughly. The post amounted to a lot of slogans without much substance to the actual argument, and therefore I brought up some of these issues in the comment section.

 

The author and I ended up participating in an exchange, which was civil and on the whole rather bloodless, though it was clear that I found some problems in the argument he is trying to present. He was even nice enough to send me a friend request.

 

However, when I signed in a few hours later, I found that my posts had been redacted, censored, and expurgated. Only the blog's author and myself are able to do this. And I didn't do it.

 

So why can't people deal with divergent opinions? Must I be censored simply because I brought up some logical issues in the author's argument? This is not about whether my comments were right or wrong, or whether his position is right or wrong. The question is not whether our opinions and arguments are right or wrong, but can we have reasonably civil dialogue about our opinions and arguments. It is certainly the author's right to limit commentary, but when he does so he forfeits any claim that we the public ought to pay him any attention, respect, or legitimacy. If he doesn't want anyone to comment, he can be alone with his self-made righteousness.

Views: 82

Comment

You need to be a member of Art of Manliness to add comments!

Join Art of Manliness

Comment by Carl Monster on April 4, 2012 at 2:03pm

Funny, disagreement, as scary as it is to me (I don't dare join the Great Debate), is one reason I like this place. I'm on FB, and it gets a bit boring after awhile, all preaching to the choir. As long it it is intelligent, I appreciate hearing another viewpoint. It's how we grow, even if it engenders some anger.

Comment by Vytautas on April 3, 2012 at 5:42pm

Thank you again, Carpe, for your considerate response!

 

Actually, my replies did not make invalid his point. A fact which, I think, makes censorship even more reprehensible because it wasn't like I actually tore his argument apart. I just slightly disagreed with some of his reasoning. And for such a reprehensible little difference in opinion I was rewarded by being cut off!

 

Also, what I am saying here is operating on the normative/intellectual level. I am speaking to how things ought to be. I know that when practical factors come into play, people's behavior is different in reality. But just because censorship is expedient doesn't mean that it is acceptable. It is cowardly and stupid. It reflects poorly on the censor and corrodes the community as a whole.

Latest Activity

Karl Helweg commented on Jonas Ogrefoln's group Archaic Technology
7 minutes ago
Penelope replied to Kneller's discussion business casual shoes for under $100?
"I totally agree. I wonder, though, about the width.  If you're an unusual size, you usually can't get your size at the lowest price tier, and sometimes not even mid-tier.  I looked at a few oxfords on walmart's website to…"
29 minutes ago
Chuck Knight replied to Kneller's discussion business casual shoes for under $100?
"I've said this before, and it's still true. You're looking for a style. What is your requirement with regards to quality? Style and taste exist independent of price. You can shop at Walmart and look like the proverbial million…"
47 minutes ago
Will replied to Nick's discussion Connecting with God Emotionally in the group Christian Men
"Well, no, recognizing love as having an action component is not changing its definition.  It's adhering to it.   But it's apparent we won't get an agreement on this."
58 minutes ago
Jonathon Ruzich joined Tookie's group
Thumbnail

Christian Men

Regardless of the specifics, we can all agree on one thing. Jesus Christ was the perfect Man who died and rose again for us such that we could have fellowship with Him
1 hour ago
Jonathon Ruzich updated their profile
1 hour ago
Penelope replied to Kneller's discussion business casual shoes for under $100?
"Macys has some extra-wide loafers around $80. If you go into the store, you can learn your best sizes and brands, and look for them on ebay, or buy online from sites that don't offer returns."
1 hour ago
Josh Allen replied to Pale Horse's discussion Study Shows Men With Inhuman Eating Habits Have Trouble Making More Humans in the group The Great Debate
"You tell me. You should know."
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service