"Well, that's up to the courts to decide, and for the two individuals involved in this hypothetical scenario to think about. Now, for the sake of not derailing the conversation, this will be my last contribution to this thread:
"I think it's the duty of each and every human being to be critical of the values that society serves us. If one's actions cause no harm and one fully understands and accepts the implied risks, then obeying the law just for the sake of…"
"We are primarily defined by who and what we are internally. I agree with you that we are defined in a sense by what we do, but only in as much as the things we do reveal something about our internal selves. This question is not about that; the OP…"
"This question is absurd. If you are manly, then when you smoke weed you'll be plain old manly you, smoking pot. If you're not manly, you wont. We tend to fuss over the details and the aesthetic choices we make, and that's wrong. "
"It's just a talking point in a wedge issue that doesn't even exist. The only way you're going to "fix" it, is by collecting the data correctly and then presenting it in its proper context. They can talk all they want for all…"