Kenneth Love
  • Male
  • Walnut Creek, CA
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share

Kenneth Love's Friends

  • Daniel Gaston
  • James Johnson
  • Max Riffner
  • Chris Jones
  • Library_Goon
  • Liam Strain
  • alophant
  • Gregory Seeley

Kenneth Love's Discussions

Yo ho ho

Started this discussion. Last reply by Raj Dec 2, 2009. 6 Replies

How are you all? I guess I should introduce myself even though I've been talking to a few of you already in The Great Debate.I'm a 28-year-old husband (to Elaine) and father (to Joe) currently living…Continue

Tags: california, oklahoma, san francisco, father, husband

 

Kenneth Love's Page

Latest Activity

Tom Sansoucy joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Apr 7
Chris N joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Feb 2
J. R. Thompson joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Aug 29, 2014
Chris J. joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Jun 19, 2014
Daniel Jensen joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
May 14, 2014
Niles joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Aug 10, 2013
Jacob Thiel joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Jul 30, 2013
Jay Moynihan joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Jul 19, 2013
DataPacRat joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Jul 4, 2013
Vincent Mabary joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Jun 3, 2013
Kevin joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Feb 3, 2013
Iorvjl Halvorsen joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Jan 24, 2013
David Russ joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Jan 16, 2013
SardonicJester joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Nov 23, 2012
Hans S. joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Aug 14, 2012
Kafka Collins joined Kenneth Love's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Skeptics

Discussions on science, pseudoscience, education, and general skepticism.May contain discussions on religion, cynicism, and other fragile topics. Not prepared on machinery used to process nuts.See More
Apr 25, 2012

Profile Information

Website
http://gigantuan.net
Interests
Programming, photography, writing.

Above all, my family.
Books
Lots of science fiction and fantasy and horror. Read most everything by Stephen King.
Movies
The Godfather, Night of the Living Dead, The Fifth Element and, (so help me) The Princess Bride are all you need to get through life.
Music
Pretty much anything.
Quote
I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it’s much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong.

-- Richard Feynman

Comment Wall (10 comments)

You need to be a member of Art of Manliness to add comments!

Join Art of Manliness

At 4:55pm on May 28, 2011, Curt Bolding said…

I dont' have to convince anyone of anything; I don't care what any of you think any more than you care what I think.  I provided a book to examine, but no one was willing to do it.  I'm not going to do others' work for them and I'm not going to stand for people just sitting on their asses pulling apart everything I say without examining my source material.  That's not skeptical, that's lazy. 

 

If somebody wants to examine my source, then I might be willing to discuss it again.  Otherwise, please do not contact me again, sir. 

At 12:02pm on May 28, 2011, Curt Bolding said…

Well, the problem, as I see it, is that one comes into your group with certain beliefs and then the group exists to tear down those beliefs.  I've had this experience in other skeptics' groups, elsewhere on the web:  the skeptics don't present their own beliefs, they just tear down the other man's.  They don't present their own beliefs, because they often don't have any other than existing to tear down the other man's.  I've since spoken to another fellow on AoM who had the same experience in your group.  He got ganged up on; nobody listened to him beyond trying to find an argument with anything he said, so he finally left.  I'm sure you'll agree that at some point it becomes an exercise in futility when it ends up being you against everyone else and the group's goal is only to denigrate your beliefs. 

 

As with the UFO discussion, I couldn't get anyone to even consider one fact, because their minds were already made up. Their "research" on the subject only consisted of leaving this site long enough to go somewhere else and find an argument to bring back.  That was obvious from what they said in their posts, because they missed certain critical facts germaine to the case in question that I knew about because I had researched the matter with an open mind.  I cited a book used in my research by a man who is well respected in the field of Ufology, and they wouldn't even consider what he had to say, but they did find time to go look up other arguments, because, as I say, their minds were already made up and they weren't willing to consider other viewpoints, just tear them down. 

 

Anyway, I'm considering coming back with a subject on which I'm more skeptical myself, like religion.

At 10:47pm on May 27, 2011, Curt Bolding said…
You're welcome.  I always do what I see the Manly thing to be, even if it involves eating some humble pie.  As I said earlier, I had been trying to back out the whole thing gracefully for some time, but it just wasn't happening.
At 10:41pm on May 27, 2011, Curt Bolding said…
Mr. Love-- I have gone back through the Skeptics' group and removed all of my posts from the comments column.  My only intention was to have interesting conversation, but instead I only seemed to succeed in antagonizing everyone.  I presented a number of facts but the response was that nobody believed them no matter what I said.  Therefore, I thought it best to just take everything out, because it was all getting out of hand, and my attitude was I was just going to continue to tell you all off ad infinitum.  I decided that this was unhealthy for me and I had nothing to prove to anyone anyway.  We all have to pick and choose what we believe.  At any rate, the manly thing was to tell you of my decision and the reasons for it, and I hope I did not cause too much trouble.
At 7:21pm on February 26, 2010, thehuhman said…


2010 CONTEST IS OPEN FOR SUBMISSIONS MARCH 1ST thru MAY 31st, 2010. Go here for complete details: CONTEST
At 8:38pm on December 1, 2009, Max Riffner said…
Thanks for the welcome!
At 7:25pm on December 1, 2009, Liam Strain said…
Welcome to AOM Kenneth. I'm enjoying your participation in the Great Debate.
At 10:59pm on November 30, 2009, Michael J. Austin said…
You're welcome sir :)
At 1:07pm on November 30, 2009, Herb Munson said…
Hi there Kenneth. Welcome to AoM. Also, I would like to invite you to take a look at one of the most active groups here. It's my new group called The Great Debate. It's the one with the colorful galaxy picture. In any case, good to have you here and welcome aboard.
At 7:22am on November 30, 2009, Michael J. Austin said…
Hello and welcome to the site Kenneth !!!!
 
 
 

Latest Activity

Michael J. K. replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"should we dam to hell everyone who had an abortion? provide a good solution I would love to see your alternative option here Abortion is hard on the women going through it, and most become depressed. Many feel trapped. Healthy debates do not…"
2 minutes ago
David Egerdahl replied to Joshua Hudson's discussion The Real Reason Women Cheat
"I agree.   "
2 minutes ago
Michael J. K. replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"I was talking in general Michael.  Most people do not want an abortion. Wow this is how you respond.   Abortion is hard on these women. So now you think you are correct it is not right or wrong I was not arguing but I can see you…"
6 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Joshua Hudson's discussion The Real Reason Women Cheat
"That's true about communication, but men and women don't generally communicate the same way. There is an issue of perception. By the time a woman is cheating, she usually believes that she has tried very hard to communicate her needs and…"
7 minutes ago
Michael J. K. replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"thank you Shane "
9 minutes ago
Michael J. K. replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"I never said the did not perform a lot of abortions Michael I said they counsel women and make sure they are making the best decision.   It is not the fault of planned parenthood that people abort.   The rate of abortion has…"
10 minutes ago
Michael J. K. replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"and if they were not done they many would be done with out a doctor until you follow a person going through this do not make judgments If planned parent hood was not there more would be dying mainly women feeling trapped by their situation. you…"
12 minutes ago
David Egerdahl replied to Joshua Hudson's discussion The Real Reason Women Cheat
"Ageed.   But if the way the woman communicates something is wrong is by cheating then she is no Lady, she is a whore.  And whores live in the street, not my home.   If there is a problem in the relationship open commutation needs to…"
20 minutes ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service