Views: 66

Attachments:

Replies to This Discussion

I found this the other day at an antique shop.  $3.00 so I figured I would pick it up.  It is in good shape other than some of the finish is coming off.  I don't feel that it affects the function of the razor.  It is mainly something to learn with.  I know it is a Gillette, but know nothing else about it.  Any help would be great.

Thanks

Nice find. That's a Gillette Tech, and it was made sometime between 1938 and 1945. In 1946 they changed the shape of the slots in the base plate. Yours are triangular; the later ones are oblong. After 1950 they started putting date codes on them; I have a '53. They're good shavers.

Awesome, thanks for the info.  I have some other photos of it.  That was before I cleaned it some.  I didn't want to scrub to hard since some of the finish is coming off.  I have shaved with it though.  It seems to do a good job.  First DE razor, so I really don't have anything to compare it to.  But I do like it.

Have a couple of the Newer Tech Heads, and one with the Ball End Handle like you have there.

The older ones with the slots are hard to find in my opinion.  If you find them in cases and in like new condition, you'll see them at quite a hefty little price tag too.  I've seen them for 50 plus dollars before.  I'm not willing to pay that for one of course, but they can be really nice looking; and are known to be great shavers.  I have yet to give any of mine a run yet.  Keep in mind if they seem to mild, most folks add a shim or two to make them more aggressive.

RSS

Latest Activity

Jack Bauer replied to Braeden P.D.'s discussion Unpopular Opinions Thread
"I always thought Nicholson's Joker was overrated.  He wasn't playing the Joker, he was playing Jack Nicholson ... the exact same character he plays in everything, with make-up. JB"
6 minutes ago
Thomas Kime joined Jason M.'s group
Thumbnail

Concealed Carry Club

Every gentleman should be able to adequately protect himself and his family from ruffians’ intent on doing harm. This group welcomes anyone who takes pride in their second amendment right to keep and bear arms in a legally concealed manner.
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"We used to have much more effective caugh syrup for our children. http://antiquecannabisbook.com/chap8/Massengill.htm So they're not historically out of touch. Purists are out of touch with our modern reality however. A pure libertarian…"
1 hour ago
Larry replied to Max Z's discussion I want to die.. in the group Depression (And Suicide)
"Hello, Max!  Are you taking any medications?  I take an antidepressant.  I have, for a number of years.  I still can't go without it. I do well, with it.  "
2 hours ago
Sir replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"I didn't believe you, of course.  So I had to look it up. Now maybe I can convince my Libertarian Catholic friend that even if ideological purity beats effectiveness, he picked the wrong kind of purity."
3 hours ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Johnson got boo'd for suggesting blind people shouldn't drive and 5yo's shouldn't use heroin. The delegates were quite vocal about their dissatisfaction. I'm surprised he won the nomination."
4 hours ago
Sir replied to Lucas Stickan's discussion Virile Agitur
"Sit virile?  Virilite fac sit?"
4 hours ago
Sir replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"If "reality" means "winning an election," no, definitely not.  Capital-L Libertarians value purity over actually winning anything.  If they didn't, they'd be a faction in R or D."
4 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service