I know they are relatively inexpensive watches, but I have several Stauers.  They seem to keep good time, I've gotten several compliments on them, and seem to be a good way to introduce yourself to automatic/self-winding watches.  I am curious about other opinions on them.  Good, bad or indifferent.

If you don't like them, why?  The same for positive reviews, why?

 

Johnnie

Views: 59

Replies to This Discussion

Stauers (and their derivatives, all beginning with the letter S) do not have a good reputation on the watch collector boards, that is among the low-end of watch collectors.  Reasons often cited include: Their advertising copy is made up out of whole cloth.  The movements are rather cheap Chinese efforts which have (in other watches) gotten a reputation for poor workmanship and poor quality control. You can find similar ostentatiously-cased watches with Chinese or Russian movements for less. The designs of the cases tend to be pastiches of design elements from eighty or a hundred years ago.

If you like inexpensive automatic watches, the Invictas with Miyota movements and the Seiko 5 models are hard to beat in their price range.  Search for Invicta automatic or Seiko 5 at Amazon or Long Island Watch. Their reliability coupled with the warranties of either  brand are well worth the money. Orient (a Japanese watch company) makes its own auto movements which are highly thought of. You might Google "Russian wristwatch", and you will find some rather ornate models that may be interesting to you, though some would find the design rather gaudy--rather like baroque Stalinist.

If you like that sort of thing, you might look for something from Russia (ornate, somewhat better quality control and not so overpriced), Invicta (download a catalog, look for Lupah), the quality control is better, and the prices at e.g. Amazon are better.  Also, Fossil has had some retro styled cases that are comparable, reasonably priced, and the Miyota automatic/Japanese quartz movements are better made and more reliable.

RSS

Latest Activity

Pale Horse replied to Braeden's discussion Star Trek or Star Wars? in the group The Great Debate
"Fair point, but if God told you he was going to erase either SW or ST from existence, and made you choose, which one would you spare?"
7 hours ago
Way2Good replied to Josh's discussion Armpits shaving or not?
"Trim - definitely trim"
8 hours ago
Poe Dameron left a comment for Arjan
"This time of year I remain shirtless 24 hours a day everywhere I can get away with it"
9 hours ago
Joseph Robert replied to Braeden's discussion Star Trek or Star Wars? in the group The Great Debate
"Neither is better. They are so very different. Star Trek is a serialized episodic TV show that hits on great themes of life in 45 minute bursts over 50 years. TV has seen nothing else like it. The movies were OK, but it was the television series…"
9 hours ago
Poe Dameron replied to Arjan's discussion Shirtless Around Women in the group The Shirtless Man
"Most of the time I am only shirtless around men since they won't think I'm flirting with them like women would. And it does feel good to be able to go shirtless more often now that it's getting warmer where I live"
9 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Braeden's discussion Star Trek or Star Wars? in the group The Great Debate
"This is one of those comments that sound so ridiculous that I think it's very probable that we are all misunderstanding it."
11 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion "Fake News" in the group The Great Debate
11 hours ago
Sir replied to Braeden's discussion Star Trek or Star Wars? in the group The Great Debate
"In a sense they are in diff universes, the Federations and the Empires.  But of course they both take  place in our universe, on the tube and the silver screen.  Surely it's ok to talk abt them as what they are,…"
11 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service