I know they are relatively inexpensive watches, but I have several Stauers.  They seem to keep good time, I've gotten several compliments on them, and seem to be a good way to introduce yourself to automatic/self-winding watches.  I am curious about other opinions on them.  Good, bad or indifferent.

If you don't like them, why?  The same for positive reviews, why?

 

Johnnie

Views: 56

Replies to This Discussion

Stauers (and their derivatives, all beginning with the letter S) do not have a good reputation on the watch collector boards, that is among the low-end of watch collectors.  Reasons often cited include: Their advertising copy is made up out of whole cloth.  The movements are rather cheap Chinese efforts which have (in other watches) gotten a reputation for poor workmanship and poor quality control. You can find similar ostentatiously-cased watches with Chinese or Russian movements for less. The designs of the cases tend to be pastiches of design elements from eighty or a hundred years ago.

If you like inexpensive automatic watches, the Invictas with Miyota movements and the Seiko 5 models are hard to beat in their price range.  Search for Invicta automatic or Seiko 5 at Amazon or Long Island Watch. Their reliability coupled with the warranties of either  brand are well worth the money. Orient (a Japanese watch company) makes its own auto movements which are highly thought of. You might Google "Russian wristwatch", and you will find some rather ornate models that may be interesting to you, though some would find the design rather gaudy--rather like baroque Stalinist.

If you like that sort of thing, you might look for something from Russia (ornate, somewhat better quality control and not so overpriced), Invicta (download a catalog, look for Lupah), the quality control is better, and the prices at e.g. Amazon are better.  Also, Fossil has had some retro styled cases that are comparable, reasonably priced, and the Miyota automatic/Japanese quartz movements are better made and more reliable.

RSS

Latest Activity

Liam Strain commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"1. Yeah, how did they get that footage? 2. That ship was leaving from Gdansk in the Baltic, less than 20 miles from the Russian city of Kaliningrad. You don't think that we'd be doing the same thing to a Russian ship 20 miles from…"
58 minutes ago
Kenneth Cole replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Hooray is right!"
1 hour ago
Kenneth Cole joined Herb Munson's group
Thumbnail

The Great Debate

"Iron sharpens iron." A place for men to impact each other by debate and exchange of ideas. This is a group where no ideas are off limits. If your motto is, "I never talk about politics or religion," this group is probably not for you. A "gym" for thinkers.See More
1 hour ago
Shane commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"How did Russia Today get that video? Really makes you think, huh?"
2 hours ago
Sir commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"I agree, but the speech was still okay.  "
2 hours ago
Pale Horse commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
" "
3 hours ago
Steve Dallas commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"I think Obama is the worst President the Union has ever had"
3 hours ago
Sir commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"Except PH, the conservatives here were more meh."
3 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service