I know they are relatively inexpensive watches, but I have several Stauers.  They seem to keep good time, I've gotten several compliments on them, and seem to be a good way to introduce yourself to automatic/self-winding watches.  I am curious about other opinions on them.  Good, bad or indifferent.

If you don't like them, why?  The same for positive reviews, why?

 

Johnnie

Views: 47

Replies to This Discussion

Stauers (and their derivatives, all beginning with the letter S) do not have a good reputation on the watch collector boards, that is among the low-end of watch collectors.  Reasons often cited include: Their advertising copy is made up out of whole cloth.  The movements are rather cheap Chinese efforts which have (in other watches) gotten a reputation for poor workmanship and poor quality control. You can find similar ostentatiously-cased watches with Chinese or Russian movements for less. The designs of the cases tend to be pastiches of design elements from eighty or a hundred years ago.

If you like inexpensive automatic watches, the Invictas with Miyota movements and the Seiko 5 models are hard to beat in their price range.  Search for Invicta automatic or Seiko 5 at Amazon or Long Island Watch. Their reliability coupled with the warranties of either  brand are well worth the money. Orient (a Japanese watch company) makes its own auto movements which are highly thought of. You might Google "Russian wristwatch", and you will find some rather ornate models that may be interesting to you, though some would find the design rather gaudy--rather like baroque Stalinist.

If you like that sort of thing, you might look for something from Russia (ornate, somewhat better quality control and not so overpriced), Invicta (download a catalog, look for Lupah), the quality control is better, and the prices at e.g. Amazon are better.  Also, Fossil has had some retro styled cases that are comparable, reasonably priced, and the Miyota automatic/Japanese quartz movements are better made and more reliable.

RSS

Latest Activity

John Muir replied to Regular Joe's discussion BREAKING: US To Normalize Relations With Cuba in the group The Great Debate
"Winkie emoticon not withstanding, "whatever brand you're selling" is a jerky, rude way to phrase your point. And you either don't understand what the word "convert" means, or you don't think practitioners of…"
4 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to David Johns's discussion Watch (chuckle)
" They're just a few lines away from calling you a sissy little mommy's boy if you don't buy their watch.  ;)"
9 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Chatmonkey's discussion Young 'boy', Looking for guidance.
"Toronto is a terrible option"
13 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Chatmonkey's discussion Young 'boy', Looking for guidance.
""My visa in the US ends in february and I am currently applying for jobs in Canada. Which I will then probably still need help from my parents whilst i again build up my client base again, should I be lucky enough to land a job. I do not feel…"
16 minutes ago
Leto Atreides II replied to David Johns's discussion Watch (chuckle)
"Is "obee kaybee" a valid response to "Really? Really??"? "
21 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to David Johns's discussion Watch (chuckle)
"The recent phenomenon of substituting "Really?  Really??" for actual commentary is irritating. Besides "really?", what's your problem with the ad? JB"
22 minutes ago
Leto Atreides II replied to David Johns's discussion Watch (chuckle)
"Obee kaybee"
36 minutes ago
David Johns posted a discussion

Watch (chuckle)

I just saw the following at the top of an ad in the January 2015 issue of National Geographic:"How to Tell Time Like a Man"Our digital-analog hybrid has two sides... tough and tougher."Really?  Really??DavidSee More
52 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service