On the fourth day of Christmas my true love gave to me...

No, actually, I have to choose. And pay most of it myself, but it stems from a generous gift when we married on boxing day.

It might be that the two on the right are right outside my price bracket. But what I am looking for is a manly watch, which by my standards (not necessarily anyone else's) means:

  • Simple and clean, functional design.
  • Non-"blingy", with lots of symbols or functions I would never use.
  • Something my grandfathers would have worn. (repeating myself there)
  • Solid in all aspects, both how it feels to handle, and the movement inside.
  • Mechanical movement. Automatic. COSC-certified.
  • Might be a tad on the expensive side, but should not say it; should not in any way scream out "Hey, I am an expensive watch!"
  • And yes, I'll have a cheap but solid quartz-type second watch for when I go climbing montains, diving etc. So this is for office, leisure and formal occasions.

Any thoughts, gentlemen?

Views: 48

Replies to This Discussion

I absolutely love the Grand Seikos, their dials and finish work are second to none.  Absolutely exquisite.  Since I am partial to complications, I would choose the one with the reserve de marche, but that's an issue of personal taste.

 

The Breitling does nothing for me, but again it's an issue of personal taste.  The big date is a nice complication, though.

 

After your statement about complications you wouldn't use, I was surprised by the inclusion of the Perregaux.  I have a Seiko, a Poljot, and a few others with the alarm complications and find that I never use the alarm.  It's a neat gadget, but not for my lifestyle.

 

Regardless of what you choose, you are a very lucky man, and each of those choices displays excellent taste.

 

Have you looked at the Citizen Campagnolo (sp?) line?  It uses a Japanese lacquering technique to embed the constellations in the dial, in real gold.  Absolutely exquisite.  They had one in a tonneau case that was a work of art.

Sorry, it was a Citizen Campanola.  Told you I wasn't sure of the spelling.  Here is a current photo of one of their round dialed watches, luxury quartz by the way with a perpetual calendar.  The Campanola line is Citizen's equivalent to the Grand Seiko.

I agree with Chuck in every way. If the 4 watches are the ones you are set on getting go with the Grande Seiko. Think not expensive but function and look. I would also look at value lines, Oris, Hamilton, Longines, Etrna, Ball. The breitling does nothing for me either hahahaha

RSS

Latest Activity

John Lee Pettimore replied to Oliver Pope's discussion Proposal - how to approach my father in law to be
"Nothing that a father would be concerned about for his daughter."
13 minutes ago
Chuck Blue, III replied to Oliver Pope's discussion Proposal - how to approach my father in law to be
"http://www.artofmanliness.com/2008/05/15/asking-a-womans-father-for-her-hand-in-marriage/. Since you are an AOM member you obviously know how useful these articles can be. This article is, more or less, the approach I took (except it was with my…"
16 minutes ago
Will replied to Will's discussion Iraqi genocide in the group The Great Debate
45 minutes ago
Will replied to David Johns's discussion Teen boys today
"So you enjoy the sensations, physical or mental, that you get from running.  Because they're excruciatingly painful?  Because they make you feel despondent and hopeless?  It's because you find them pleasant in some way,…"
1 hour ago
Will replied to Daniel Rodriguez's discussion Should the salary of persons in the government be just above, or at, the poverty line? in the group The Great Debate
"Strongly disagree for politicians.  If this were implemented (and it could not be; who would vote for it?)... ...the greedy would have to look elsewhere to fund their lifestyles.  They would all be for sale. ...the not-greedy would have to…"
1 hour ago
Daniel Rodriguez added a discussion to the group The Great Debate
Thumbnail

Salary on Politicians?

One can state that, for offices of government, that the Salary be no more than the poverty line. After all, politicians are public servants, not a job for money. Disagree, agree?I personally can see a slew of questions come up. Why, then, have the military exempt? Cut the pay for them all - but they are also the ones who actually protect the land. But then it can double back - what then do they do that politicians do not. Or, even, have a Pay grade system for the Politicians - save the fact…See More
3 hours ago
Oliver Pope replied to Oliver Pope's discussion Proposal - how to approach my father in law to be
"Haha that's true! Probably will just nut up and do it today though. As for the fraught comment - not any more, never been happier - i just had a couple of problems with alcohol and depression that made me not very nice to be around. All good…"
4 hours ago
Jay D replied to David Johns's discussion Teen boys today
"Its a matter of perception. Let it explain with running. I go running since iam 14, i enjoy it, there are multiple reasons why i do it, its healthy, it makes my butt look great but the main reason is that i like it, i enjoy it and might aswell be…"
4 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service