The New Bull Moose Party


The New Bull Moose Party

A revival of the Bull Moose Party, which was created by Theodore Roosevelt in 1912.

Location: United States of America
Members: 75
Latest Activity: Nov 3

Discussion Forum

Progressiveism vs. Liberalism

Started by Philip Rodney Moon. Last reply by Micheal McEvoy Nov 26, 2011. 2 Replies

This article from goes a long way to show the difference between…Continue

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of The New Bull Moose Party to add comments!

Comment by Neal B on February 19, 2013 at 3:36am

Hi all, Hope to see this party make a come back


Comment by Dave Payne on August 12, 2012 at 12:49am

I actually changed my political affiliation a couple of days ago to "Bull Moose." I am registered to vote in West Virginia now as a member of the "Bull Moose" party. Waiting on my card. 

Comment by Haskins on June 17, 2012 at 10:20pm
This is a length to a website that has great news stories.
Comment by Ian Wilson on January 23, 2012 at 5:41pm

kinda quiet here.  especially in light of all that is happening in politics with the Republicans falling all over themselves....errrr... i mean, trying to choose a candidate for president.

Comment by Philip Rodney Moon on March 11, 2011 at 1:07am

Hello gentlemen,


In thw 1912 Progressive (Bull Moose) Party Platform, it says "We favor the organization of the workers, men and women, as a mean...


In that spirit I've created a new group to specifically address the issues of labor. Union Brothers is for union members and supports who believe workers should have a voice in the workplace to better their condition and share in the success and profits of their labor.

Comment by Steve Scarfia on August 21, 2010 at 4:16am
I just wanted to take a moment to thank everyone here on this board for making it such a civil and interesting place to be. I have been really busy for the past few months, and as such, have not been on here in a while. I plan on remedying that however. I also wanted to make everyone aware of this great site that I found through Facebook (of all places):

It's not a new party, but it's an effort to educate the American public about what real progressiveism truly is. I hope you all enjoy it.

Comment by Joe Dreyfuss on June 28, 2010 at 10:52pm
To Ryan Brooks:
History shows that Duverger's Law holds up over time, so a new major party can't rise until one of the existing two splinters or collapses. I would love to see this work but we need a clear, unified philosophy and a major candidate to create halo and coattail effects.
Comment by Matthew Shepherd on May 3, 2010 at 6:27pm
How is the party any different in platform from the status quo? If you look at it we are doing a damn good job of imperialism and government intervention (both hallmarks of teddy). How does the party really differ?
Comment by Ryan Brooks on April 30, 2010 at 9:26pm
What do you guys think it would actually take to get the Bull moose party back into the lime light? When I talk politics with people, I become suprised with how many people truly beleive we need a 3rd party to even things out. With the principles that the party was founded on, it sounds like something that could work today. Any thoughts on that?
Comment by Bradley A Harris on March 1, 2010 at 4:47pm
Being a progressive is not a dirty word. The government has stopping working for us and is working for those corprations that are lining thier pockets. Media types like Glen Beck just make the fight of progressive that much more difficult.

Members (75)


Latest Activity

Mike S. replied to Rick Shelton's discussion Question about allowing/disallowing refugees in the US in the group The Great Debate
"I'm a bit late on this one, but I'd like to address your first question. They want to unite all of the Islamic world under their rule. If everyone refuses the refugees, then they may very well end up going right back into the hands of the…"
10 minutes ago
Mike S. replied to Mad Jester's discussion Disobeying Orders in the Military in the group The Great Debate
"Here is the oath that enlisted in the U.S. military swear:  So basically, if you know an order is unlawful, you MUST disobey it. Accordingly, there are systems in place to help you against reprisal (though it doesn't always work as well as…"
19 minutes ago
Mike S. replied to John Muir's discussion Should the US Apprehend and Execute Robert Snowden? in the group The Great Debate
"Yep. Make him live life on the run. I'm okay with that. It is less work for us. "
29 minutes ago
Mike S. replied to Sam K's discussion When is joking/talking about sex okay?
"There is a time and place for everything. I make comments sometimes amongst my friends and only within earshot of them. Those remarks are few and far between and are typically "your mom" jokes. Past that, you end up sounding like a douche.…"
33 minutes ago
Mark David updated their profile
7 hours ago
Robert Edwin House replied to Michael Ind's discussion Hello
"A hearty welcome from across the pond."
10 hours ago
Robert Edwin House replied to Jimmy Morang's discussion Introducing Myself
"Welcome to the community. I'm brand new myself. "
10 hours ago
Michael Martin replied to Specs's discussion Thanksgiving 2015. What are your plans?
"We have a big ole Thanksgiving at my house each year. With all my family we usually have about 20 people here. Love to see my grandkids get so excited when they see the turkey and all the trimmings. Great time to be together as a family!"
10 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service