There are so many ways to brew coffee - standard drip, French press, vacuum/syphon brew, percolating - what's your favorite and what do you normally use?

I have a drip machine that I use every day, but press is great and I'd love to try vacuum.

Views: 679

Replies to This Discussion

I thought the French press was the undisputed champion :)

It's certainly my fav, but I haven't tried vacuum.....
I have a Technivorm drip brewer, which is great. But when I have the time to pay attention I love a vacuum brewer--that's the best coffee I've had. It does require attention, however.
when I'm not too lazy, I love using a French press.. which is especially awesome when you're out camping and can make that steaming brew from freshly ground beans and a pot of water boiled from off an open fire. divine!
I know cafetierre is supposed to be the best as it doesn't remove the oils from the coffee, but there's always a special place in my heart for my paper-filter coffee machine as it has an auto timer so I can set it to go off in the morning automatically, making it much easier to get out of bed. Also in my studio is a Bialetti espresso maker, just like a stove-top but with an electric base as there's no stove, and I just like to make Americanos with that and the kettle...
Espresso is my favorite but I've got to try vacuum.
I would love to try a french press, but I just never got around to getting myself one, I usually just stick with a standard drip cause that's the easiest.
My wife and I had a French Press that we loved, but it broke. I had an old Krups coffee maker that I'd used before we got the French Press, and in all honesty it makes as good a cup as the French Press did. Also, in my attempts to be "green" I realized that it probably takes a lot less energy to heat up coffee and brew it in a coffee maker than to boil the water on a stove (where you have a lot more energy loss). We bought a reusable filter for it and the coffee is great! So we save money and get great coffee.
French Press all the way. Aside from that, I am good to go with two well-pulled shots of espresso.
Hi Michael, a couple thoughts on French press pots and grinders:
You don't have to get terribly fancy on the press pot - as long as it has a fine mesh screen to strain the ground coffee, you should be fine. Additional niceties, if you wanted to splurge, would include an extra mesh screen up at the spout to catch any last remaining grounds, and maybe double-wall glass to help insulate the heat of the coffee if you plan on letting it sit for a while. The double-wall will run about $100. But you can get a very good, standard press pot for like $30 or $40.

Re. grinders, sounds like you have a blade grinder (a single blade running at the bottom of the bean container - like a mini food processor). These aren't great - they create two relatively important problems in grinding coffee:
1) blade grinders produce a very uneven grind. Some gounds are large, some are small. This produces a bitter taste in the coffee
2) blade grinders produce a lot of heat, which can negatively affect the flavor of the beans

If you also use a drip machine, or an espresso maker, you may want to look into conical burr grinders. These allow you adjust the coarseness of the grind, so you can have a very coarse grind for the French Press and a medium grind for the drip machine (and fine grind for espresso). If you're not grinding for espresso, you could probably get away with a $60-$80 burr grinder. If you're grinding for espresso, then I'd start in the $200 range and do a fair amount of research.

My two cents, for what they're worth.

Michael Kline said:
I am interested in buying a French press. What should I look for? Any accessories I may need? I do have a bean grinder but it is not adjustable. Any advice is appreciated!
Baratza Refurbs

I think any of those would work for a secondary/non-espresso grinder. Or look into a Hario Skerton hand grinder. Mark Prince (coffeegeek.com) and a bunch of rockstar baristas are big fans of it, and it can choke a La M GS/3, so it's good for espresso too.
I really like my Aerobie Aeropress. It works as advertised in my opinion.
1) Very easy to use.
2) Its fast. It brews the coffie in about 20 seconds plus the time it takes to bring the water to 160-180 deg. F
2) Easy to clean, just rinse it off.
3) If the coffee is made according to their instructions, it really does bring out all the flavor of the coffee without any bitterness.
4) Its versatile too, you can make anything between one to four espressos or American cups at a time.
5) It only costs$25-$30 and $4 for a years worth of filters. I reuse the filters with great results so that year's worth of filters is going to last 4-5 times longer.

Its only shortcoming is the 4 cup capacity limit at a time, so its not for entertaining large groups, which hasn't been an issue for me yet.
I love to drink a strong cup of coffee. I find that the French Press works best for me.

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Robin Holmström's discussion Tarzan flick as date?
"I used to live where we still had party lines. Not only would I be calling her whole house, but also two or three of her neighbor's houses as well."
1 hour ago
Jack Bauer replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"For what it's worth, God gave us the ability to figure out how to do all kinds of things that are wrong.  That we discovered the ability to do it doesn't necessarily mean it isn't "automatically wrong". To answer the…"
1 hour ago
Robin Holmström replied to Robin Holmström's discussion Tarzan flick as date?
"I was hoping she did but no. I don't even think it should matter, it's still me asking her out no matter how I do it. Wish I could've known. So there's 0 chance now? Calling her after getting a no through text probably won't…"
1 hour ago
Steve Dallas replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"Sounds like you and your dad need to listen to your Johnny Cash singing about his Cadillac My view on the whole thing though is that if God gave us the ability to figure this stuff out, then it can't automatically be wrong. For a discussion…"
2 hours ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"In that case I share your beliefs and concerns.  As I too would worry about that being, being an empty shell.  I see no way that a truly "artificial being" could possess a soul, and that is truly what worries me more than just…"
2 hours ago
Steve Dallas replied to Robin Holmström's discussion Tarzan flick as date?
"If she doesn't want to answer, she won't. If she wants to talk to you, she will pick up. That takes care of calling or not. Remember, a big chunk of us grew up when you would call the entire house just to speak with her. So calling her…"
2 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"I mean making life without one or the other, in a lab. I know it is already being done to an extent."
2 hours ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"You can still start with an egg and a sperm and grow a being in a lab.  Is that what you're considering man made, or because it started as two parts (sperm and egg), is it not man made?  What constitutes "Man Made"…"
2 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service