They dropped a bombshell. I think it's worth discussing.

Views: 85

Replies to This Discussion

Would you care to summarize your thoughts on the matter? 

My own thoughts are conflicted. Half with the unsurprised, but still disappointed revelations. And half with the very real damage this leak presents, since they didn't redact large sections of code snippets, making countermeasures easier for foreign governments to develop. 

My own thoughts are conflicted. I'll post them after some more people chime in.

No evidence it's ever been used against citizens of the US, but it certainly benefits our foreign enemies to know some of the tactics that our intelligence agency uses.

From a perspective as private citizen: No surprise at all, its kinda what you expected anyway.

From a professional perspective: As a company we spend millions each year for IT security and a lot of it is to protect against the USA which is ridiculous considering they are considered a ally. It is also at a point were it is damaging for for US company's (good for us from a european perspective) since the they loose trust in with that customers.

Help me put together what's the news here.

I think it's about fedswiretapping (whom?).  If so:  is there news, or just confirmation?

A little bit of searching gets this info on recent wiretaps in one case:

NYTimes says they wiretapped Flynn's calls to Russian diplomats (and "routinely" wiretap such calls):  https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/us/politics/kushner-flynn-sessio...

and that it was part of an investigation:  https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associa...

Both those articles attribute the wiretaps at least partly to "American intelligence agencies," so it can't be that it's intelligence agencies doing it, right?

If the reaction is, "We need to know that intelligence agencies are wiretapping American citizens," I understand.  Just not sure yet how Wikileaks contributed to that.  Admittedly I haven't dug into that extensively.

This is a different leak - more about embedded spy software in our phones, smart TVs and the like. 

Would have been helpful if PH has been more specific in the OP. 

I was referring to Vault 7, but any other related subjects are welcome.

This is specifically about the drop about the CIA able to turn Samsung TVs into listening devices and phones and the like; but no one should be surprised by this.  Hell Asange did a tutorial on how it was done and how to combat it over a year ago for crying out loud.

About the wiretaps, all calls to foreign diplomats are tapped.  Flynn knew this, which is why no one can understand why he didn't come forward with the information...

A modest note to the paranoid.  Even if Wikileaks published accurate and complete CIA software...there are 16 OTHER US intelligence agencies.  And the really paranoid wonder if this "revelation" is a CIA initiated smokescreen, so folks will waste time on it and miss the real technology and software that compromises your smartphone and the rest of your IoT devices.

My advice.  Don't do shit that'll make the government interested in watching you.  If you do that, you don't have anything to worry about.

Millions of Soviet citizens got executed after doing nothing in particular to make government interested in watching them.  Half the population of Cambodia.  12 million Europeans in areas controlled by the Nazis.  Even in this country, you could be a peaceful unassuming person and get sent to prison (Japanese) or get massacred (Indians).  I think we need to be a little more proactive in stopping government from misusing its powers.  (Not saying whether it was in this instance, as I haven't looked into it yet.)

There is no evidence that our government is misusing it's powers, but you've made a valid point.  I still have much more important things to do then to put on my tinfoil hat and worry that the government is watching me type this message through my iPhone camera.  I choose not to live my life in fear, or constant suspicion.

RSS

Latest Activity

jazzgirl205 replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"Ameretta, what do you do that brings you joy and gets you around people?  Forget about men right now.  Concentrate on being with all kinds of people doing interesting things.  I'm not making light of your predicament, trust me on…"
26 minutes ago
R. Max 2.0 replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"hmmm, from at least my perspective, no one said anything was easy. You could call it oversimplifying, and you'd be right. Like I said, this is out of my depth, but it seems similar to the phrase "love yourself" in general. Everyone…"
1 hour ago
Ameretta replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"I wanted to  be straightforward with the title, but this is how I truly feel, and I think that the person you mentioned is oversimplifying the problem because how would you feel if you were told you were the highest rate of…"
1 hour ago
Ameretta replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"Then don't invest your time in replying to my question because you're doing yourself more of an inconvenience than you are torwards me. "
1 hour ago
Tim replied to Tim's discussion Are You the Initiator or the Follower? in the group The Shirtless Man
"I was the initiator earlier this week at the gym. It was late and I was the only person there for quite a while so after some warm up sets the shirt came off. Later on a guy comes in, we exchanged greetings and then continued with our work outs. He…"
2 hours ago
John Muir replied to Nick H's discussion Has AOM jumped the shark or is it's just cyclical in the group The Great Debate
"maybe that's cuz you've had him blocked. He's an educated armed forces veteran. And a homo :)"
2 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Nick H's discussion Has AOM jumped the shark or is it's just cyclical in the group The Great Debate
"Meanwhile, you're an "intense purveyor" of ad hominem, white knight-ing, condescension, CNN conspiracy theories and virtue signaling. I don't remember the last time you actually contributed anything worthwhile to a thread. You…"
3 hours ago
Eddy Kirdland replied to Arjan's discussion Shirtless Around Women in the group The Shirtless Man
"If her husband is sometimes shirtless, too, it's probably okay if you are, but, if you want to be sure, continue to put a shirt on when she comes around until and unless she or her husband tells you not to worry about it. "
3 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service