This is a genuine question from an Englishman who doesn't keep up with the news a great deal. The readers of AoM seem, on the whole, anti-Obama. Why? His praises are sung pretty often here in Europe. 

Views: 2867

Replies to This Discussion

Obama is praised in Europe because he does what is good for Europe and cares about what Europe wants. The same is not true regarding the USA.

Can you clarify why you say that?  I'm not seeing how Obama's policies benefit Europe.

I can think of two ways. One, by having the fed print 18 billion a month he's made investing in the EU an actual wise option. Once the USA finally turns off the money tap, that big whooshing sound you'll hear will be the tons of foreign dollars crossing the Atlantic, pushing the overregulated, overvalued EU back into recession. And two, with Obama's endless dallying and awaiting UN support on foreign intervention in places like Syria, Obama makes the normally indecisive EU look proactive.

May I second your opinion? May I also add that Mr. Obama looks weaker every time something happens--he was dragged into war in Libya, protesting every step of the way, It's not war!, by European opinions--he was stopped from going to war in Syria by European opinions, again, protesting that it's not war, anyway--& it seems like whatever disaster is next, he's going to go through the motions again...

I'd say that the only reasons the President didn't authorize "surgical strikes" in Syria are:

1.  After 12 years of military involvement in the Middle East, Congress had the political will to say, enough. 

2.  Not so much European opinion about the idea, but RUSSIAN opposition to air strikes hitting a client state. 

3.  Simple political economics, in a time of domestic fiscal retrenchment, the government simply can't afford to fully fund both guns and butter.

 

I'm just relieved he didn't..

Regarding your first point, really, it's a question--how many unbelievably small strikes can you balance on top of public & Congressional disapproval?--The answer is, Mr. Obama is officially the weakest president since Carter; I believe he will soon outdo him & then JFK, too. Other feeble leaders will look at him, astounded.

I agree with your second point.

Your third, too. Syria simply does not have the appeal Libya had. Liberals apparently only pick on the smallest, slightest stuff.

Syria used chemical weapons. A pretty much international no-no since the end of wwi and the response from the USA was...zilch.

Obama keeps getting compared to carter but I think a better one would be Wilson.

At least liberalism was still a fighting faith back then...

I don't think that's to Europe's benefit.  Making EU look proactive may be good for Eurocrat careers, but not for Europe.  Bankrupting the US, as Nick says, is going to cause economic disaster for everyone.

The longer I live here the more I'm convinced Eurocrats and the EU couldn't care what was good for Europe.

Yeah, well, if people stopped making trouble for the bureaucrats, things would go according to plan...

RSS

Latest Activity

Brian Splash replied to Andrew's discussion How do you take your coffee? I prefer it black with a slice of butter in it.
"I only have one a day in the morning at home , French press with one tea spoon of condensed milk ."
2 hours ago
Native Son replied to Zachary Warner's discussion Manly Hobbies
"agent provocateur..."
2 hours ago
Tim replied to Shane's discussion Secret Lives of Men in the group The Great Debate
"And the same re: "Tootsie." Dustin Hoffman going off in interview after interview about how he weeped for his inability to bear a child blah blah blah get over yourself Dusty...."
3 hours ago
Tim replied to Shane's discussion Secret Lives of Men in the group The Great Debate
"" If I was to say the reason women were so weepy is because they're lost little girls who had their masculin carved from them. If I was to proclaim men the saviors of women. I'm pretty sure I'd get kicked in the nuts for it…"
3 hours ago
Melchizedek Cox updated their profile
3 hours ago
Will replied to Shane's discussion Secret Lives of Men in the group The Great Debate
"Sure would.  But if you instead said that the only proper emotional expression was FEMALE stoicism -- that women are weepy because the patriarchy carved out their inner confidence -- and that men are to blame for it -- that is, if you were a…"
4 hours ago
Rick Shelton replied to Tom Baker's discussion Masculinities and social class
"Jay, I liken it to teaching my son to be self sufficient, sometimes I have to get on him a bit and play to his shame.  It's a well known and well used method of teaching manliness.  If you're going to be part of our community…"
4 hours ago
Steve Dallas replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"Still no, I can't. I have to start at your argument, which again states Now, if your argument was that one will go to an expert in a field, then I have no beef as that is what is usually referred to as common sense. It is a completely…"
6 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service