This is a genuine question from an Englishman who doesn't keep up with the news a great deal. The readers of AoM seem, on the whole, anti-Obama. Why? His praises are sung pretty often here in Europe. 

Views: 2794

Replies to This Discussion

Obama is praised in Europe because he does what is good for Europe and cares about what Europe wants. The same is not true regarding the USA.

Can you clarify why you say that?  I'm not seeing how Obama's policies benefit Europe.

I can think of two ways. One, by having the fed print 18 billion a month he's made investing in the EU an actual wise option. Once the USA finally turns off the money tap, that big whooshing sound you'll hear will be the tons of foreign dollars crossing the Atlantic, pushing the overregulated, overvalued EU back into recession. And two, with Obama's endless dallying and awaiting UN support on foreign intervention in places like Syria, Obama makes the normally indecisive EU look proactive.

May I second your opinion? May I also add that Mr. Obama looks weaker every time something happens--he was dragged into war in Libya, protesting every step of the way, It's not war!, by European opinions--he was stopped from going to war in Syria by European opinions, again, protesting that it's not war, anyway--& it seems like whatever disaster is next, he's going to go through the motions again...

I'd say that the only reasons the President didn't authorize "surgical strikes" in Syria are:

1.  After 12 years of military involvement in the Middle East, Congress had the political will to say, enough. 

2.  Not so much European opinion about the idea, but RUSSIAN opposition to air strikes hitting a client state. 

3.  Simple political economics, in a time of domestic fiscal retrenchment, the government simply can't afford to fully fund both guns and butter.

 

I'm just relieved he didn't..

Regarding your first point, really, it's a question--how many unbelievably small strikes can you balance on top of public & Congressional disapproval?--The answer is, Mr. Obama is officially the weakest president since Carter; I believe he will soon outdo him & then JFK, too. Other feeble leaders will look at him, astounded.

I agree with your second point.

Your third, too. Syria simply does not have the appeal Libya had. Liberals apparently only pick on the smallest, slightest stuff.

Syria used chemical weapons. A pretty much international no-no since the end of wwi and the response from the USA was...zilch.

Obama keeps getting compared to carter but I think a better one would be Wilson.

At least liberalism was still a fighting faith back then...

I don't think that's to Europe's benefit.  Making EU look proactive may be good for Eurocrat careers, but not for Europe.  Bankrupting the US, as Nick says, is going to cause economic disaster for everyone.

The longer I live here the more I'm convinced Eurocrats and the EU couldn't care what was good for Europe.

Yeah, well, if people stopped making trouble for the bureaucrats, things would go according to plan...

RSS

Latest Activity

Steve Dallas replied to Will's discussion Moral relativism in the group The Great Debate
"Of all that I said, you could only reply to me saying I don't give a shit about the philosophers?"
4 minutes ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to Jack M.'s discussion What book do you think is worth re-reading and why?.
"I don't know what is it about the hobbit, but it does bring out that in people who read it. I got my Libraries ancient copy, on virtue of being the only one to read it again and again!"
9 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to East London Gent's discussion Girlfriends lies and temper
"She did you a favour. The only thing that will fix your feelings now is time. But you can alleviate them by surrounding yourself with friends, being socially active, trying out new things, etc. You're better off this way. And you're 90%…"
16 minutes ago
William Reed replied to Jack M.'s discussion What book do you think is worth re-reading and why?.
"I didn't scroll through all the replies, but mine is the Hobbit. I've read it probably 8 times now. The only book I've ever read more than once. Believe it or not, it sparked my love of the outdoors :)"
21 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to George Gibbs's discussion Where to Travel?
"If you plan on flying anywhere, that doesn't leave you with many options other than perhaps Central or South America. "
28 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Will's discussion Moral relativism in the group The Great Debate
"I don't have to think of God and sure as shit don't have to think of a greatest human being. There is no otherwise, I just don't. Morality is merely the rules that society places on the individuals that reside within said society.…"
30 minutes ago
David F. replied to Rob --'s discussion 22 year old wanting a style change?
"Well said!"
35 minutes ago
David F. replied to Rob --'s discussion 22 year old wanting a style change?
"If you are buying clothing, go with dockers/chinos, dress shoes like brogues or a loafer of some sort. The cost for the pants is about the same, as it the cost in changing shoes."
40 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service