Oh, what a contrast this shows, between leaders.

 

Wow!

 

Views: 484

Replies to This Discussion

Didn't the US public debt climb under Reagan and GW Bush and then only begin to decline under Clinton? 

Not trying to be smart about it. I just find it weird that when people here talk about presidents then ignore 8 yrs of Clinton. Point is, US debt was better under his watch. Maybe his doing or maybe the doing of the Republican-controlled congress. I don't know.

I just find it weird that when people here talk about presidents then ignore 8 yrs of Clinton. Point is, US debt was better under his watch. Maybe his doing or maybe the doing of the Republican-controlled congress. I don't know.

 

The Clinton years were mostly uneventful.  That's actually a good thing.  But, consequently, Clinton is mostly forgettable...except for his memorable quotations in Bartlett's.  Few people mention Daddy Bush, either...most people mention him only because of his son, truth be known.

 

If you go back and look...Clinton's first two years were a slashing of the military, and a ramping up of spending and debt due to proposed social programs like HillaryCare.  But, after the Republican victory, and Newt's "Contract with America," that was put to an end, and fiscal responsibility actually reigned for the first time in too many years.

 

Thanks to Reagan, we had enormous amounts of money coming in to the coffers, and thanks to Gingrich, we weren't spending as much...we ended up with an actual budget surplus.  And yes, many give that credit to Bill Clinton.

 

Of course, those are the same deluded fools who think his impeachment had to do with his affair, rather than his crime...perjuring himself while under oath.

Of course, those are the same deluded fools who think his impeachment had to do with his affair, rather than his crime...perjuring himself while under oath.

Nevermind that he was under oath because of a massive ruckus about an affair. 

Doesn't matter what they asked him.  He was legally bound to tell the truth.

 

He lied under oath.  A federal crime, in that particular instance.  And, a felony *is* grounds for impeachment *and* removal from office, in that order.

 

You may consider it frivolous...it may *be* frivolous.  But, it's also legal, and quite correct.

I don't disagree. I just don't think it can so casually be divorced from the farce that put him in that position in the first place.

If you're going to hold him up for the perjury. I'm going to hold up the other side for the hypocrisy of the whole damn thing in the first place. Both are shameful. Too bad only one was a crime. 

Didn't the US public debt climb under Reagan and GW Bush and then only begin to decline under Clinton? 


In part, yes. The exact how's and why's and rather or not they even count (The cold war, the deals made with the democratic congress, etc,) are all debatable, but as a percentage, national debt went up. Total tax REVENUES, as in sheer dollar amounts, went up significantly under Reagan, but he increased dramatically both infrastructure spending and defense spending. 

 Now, some argue that the improvements in infrastructure and forcing the collapse of the Soviet Union set the foundation for the huge economic expansion in the 90s' and early 2000's (Which is my opinion), but it's an endless debate. 

I seem to recall the debt limit being raised when Reagan was in office - multiple times! And nobody threw a tantrum and threatened to start slitting throats. I seem to recall Ronald Reagan increasing the national debt with his Star Wars and other pet projects. I seem to recall George Bush, Sr. warning that decreasing revenues and increasing spending was "voodoo economics." No one listened. 

Yeah, I just don't look back and see Reagan all that fondly

RSS

Latest Activity

Mikhail E. joined Lightbringer's group
Thumbnail

Martial Artists

For martial artists of all stripes, Eastern, Western, or in between.
11 minutes ago
Nick H replied to Paul MacAlindin's discussion "I like guns" in the group The Great Debate
"Not sure of your definition of crackpot but what I am is a doctor who currently works in a psychiatric hospital. giving the power to decide if someone can or cannot own a firearm to a government psychologist would not only be a waste of tax dollars…"
3 hours ago
Dakota Caraway replied to Braeden's discussion My Fellow Americans, What Nation are you From?
"The Californians seem to be around the Austin and Houston area."
5 hours ago
Native Son replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"Nah, he wouldn't speak for the chump change Sarah gets...only 6 figures for The Donald's whizzdumb?"
7 hours ago
Specs replied to Alberto's discussion Buying Arrows - Any experienced archers out there?
"There's a lot of factors in that.  What are you doing with the bow? Are you just shooting targets, if so any of those will work.  On mine I just have a variety.  I would say get some good lightweight, middle, and heavyweight in a…"
8 hours ago
Milo Morris replied to Paul MacAlindin's discussion Privilege is invisible to those who have it
"You've made some very generalized statements that were true for most black people depending on which decade you want to discuss. And while the ability from blacks to pull themselves up by their bootstraps has been hampered by many elements, the…"
8 hours ago
Randy commented on Clayton Davis's group The Manly Art of Amateur (Ham) Radio
"I got 31/35 on the General exam on 8-29-15. KE0EUV /AG. "
9 hours ago
Carl Monster replied to Braeden's discussion My Fellow Americans, What Nation are you From?
"Sounds very urban and vital. I enjoy country life; people are more or less the same, usually polite and I don't have to dance around issues of race, culture or orientation, though people really tend to leave each other alone anyway."
10 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service