Oh, what a contrast this shows, between leaders.

 

Wow!

 

Views: 484

Replies to This Discussion

Doesn't matter what they asked him.  He was legally bound to tell the truth.

 

He lied under oath.  A federal crime, in that particular instance.  And, a felony *is* grounds for impeachment *and* removal from office, in that order.

 

You may consider it frivolous...it may *be* frivolous.  But, it's also legal, and quite correct.

I don't disagree. I just don't think it can so casually be divorced from the farce that put him in that position in the first place.

If you're going to hold him up for the perjury. I'm going to hold up the other side for the hypocrisy of the whole damn thing in the first place. Both are shameful. Too bad only one was a crime. 

Didn't the US public debt climb under Reagan and GW Bush and then only begin to decline under Clinton? 


In part, yes. The exact how's and why's and rather or not they even count (The cold war, the deals made with the democratic congress, etc,) are all debatable, but as a percentage, national debt went up. Total tax REVENUES, as in sheer dollar amounts, went up significantly under Reagan, but he increased dramatically both infrastructure spending and defense spending. 

 Now, some argue that the improvements in infrastructure and forcing the collapse of the Soviet Union set the foundation for the huge economic expansion in the 90s' and early 2000's (Which is my opinion), but it's an endless debate. 

I seem to recall the debt limit being raised when Reagan was in office - multiple times! And nobody threw a tantrum and threatened to start slitting throats. I seem to recall Ronald Reagan increasing the national debt with his Star Wars and other pet projects. I seem to recall George Bush, Sr. warning that decreasing revenues and increasing spending was "voodoo economics." No one listened. 

RSS

Latest Activity

Liam Strain replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"Don't mistake my statement of "the law says X" as saying that it *should* be that way. Simply that it currently *is* that way - and that there are existing arguments for why that is. They can be challenged, but so far, I see no need…"
21 minutes ago
Nature of a Man replied to Lumberjoe's discussion What happens when Islamic sexism meets Icelandic feminism / gender equality? Let's find out! in the group The Great Debate
"Except they did adhere to their demands, they were allowed to use the bus of their choosing. The only thing which the link says is some anonymous folks threw a fit about it on their Twitter accounts, not that the bus company did anything about…"
22 minutes ago
Nature of a Man replied to Lumberjoe's discussion What happens when Islamic sexism meets Icelandic feminism / gender equality? Let's find out! in the group The Great Debate
"That's all well and good, but as far as I'm aware the bus company never banned them from using their service. So are you going to start a petition to have them do so, or are you going to just keep posting hot air while the Muslims go on…"
23 minutes ago
Nature of a Man replied to Lumberjoe's discussion What happens when Islamic sexism meets Icelandic feminism / gender equality? Let's find out! in the group The Great Debate
"Does indeed."
24 minutes ago
Nature of a Man replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"It goes both ways. If your opinion was "Colorado should not legalize weed and it should remain illegal forever", you'd have to make a position for your opposition as well.I've already stated potential arguments here which…"
26 minutes ago
Liam Strain replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"I agree, if you think a law should be changed, present an argument for why. We fought against the laws which provided for slavery. Colorado fought against the laws which made Marijuana illegal. In those cases, they present the argument against the…"
35 minutes ago
Nature of a Man replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"Sorry I'm just amazed by how weak that argument was. It's not that complicated, if someone wants to make a case for why... Colorado should or shouldn't legalize marijuana, then yes it's on them to provide a reason.If their…"
41 minutes ago
Liam Strain replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"So - you won't explain why you think the current framework for our contract law is invalid.  I take that to mean you don't understand it, and just want to posit an oppositional question to everything rather than actually discuss your…"
48 minutes ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service