The description of the new group is:

"Touch Practice has come to describe an intentional, mindful, 60-90 minute exchange of non-sexual touch between men. The practice is based on hugging, holding, and being held.."


And what does the following tell you? (extracted from About Touch Practice, at the site):

"Touch Practice partner may wish only to have contact between our hands, and no other parts of the body. On the other hand, partners may also explore full body touch up to and including genital touch. Some Touch Practice partnerships explore erotic energy, and others have no erotic interest."

We are living in a culture where feminists have successfully inculcated into the masses that men should be more like women and eschew any thoughts and/or outward demonstrations of dominance and violence in favor of acceptance, passivity and vulnerability as a virtue.  It is a glorification of "touchy-feely" that has succeeded to a great extent in confusing our young men's sexuality and emasculating them, as is proven in a great many of the discussions and comments on AoM from lost young men seeking guidance.  

What say you?

Views: 2940

Replies to This Discussion

Deeply

So...if this is a feminine thing to do...does this mean there's a group where women get naked and feel each other up for an hour?

Yes. About a third of the internet.

College thats where I'm going now.

Sir, I have been revising representative video material for years now, and I can tell you, yes, yes, they do: Mostly, they do so while scantily clad, and/or while bathing in baby oil.

This appears to be a behavior mostly common among women with model-good looks.

This is worse than the blight on planet Earth known as "Bronies."

Here's something to help us recover from the lack of manliness:  

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HUUR6lxnAME

A thread has appeared at the Touch Practice group, called "Only the Strong Survive."  It appears to be an effort at countering this discussion.  The following is extracted from the thread:

"Only homophobic bigots who feel a threat to their own sense of manliness would find fault with this venture."  


Frankly, I expected something like that:  shrill cries of "bigotry" and "homophobia" from the "tolerant" among us.  Right in there with "racism."  

I guess since I started this discussion, I must be a prime candidate as one who "feels a threat to (my) own sense of manliness;" this after a full career in the Army, serving during three wars and fathering four children.  Go figure. 

I'm secure in my masculinity.  I'm just not a gay.

When I taught school in Texas on the Mexican border right out of college, my Mexican American colleague teachers would frequently put their arms around my neck as we walked and/or sit closely.  And in college my friends from the Middle East freely touched and were touched by other guys.  Of course all of this was new to me as an American, so I really learned how different cultures are around the world.

There are not two ethnic groups more inclined to be "macho" than latin-Americans and middle-easterners; the very word "macho" coming from the Spanish for male.  

Momentary touching as signs of affection or regard - to include kissing on both cheeks (no, not those cheeks) by Frenchmen - are not intentional and conscious efforts to bring out the feminine side in men so as to make men more "sensitive" to each other.  And most especially not "macho" is lengthy conscious full-body contact, with genital "touching" as an accepted part of it.  

+1

RSS

Latest Activity

J. D. replied to Andrew's discussion Interesting Article: 'Men Suck At Friendship'
"In my experience, I have found it to be true that most men really do suck at friendship in a big way.  I don't pretend to understand why or have a grasp on all the personal and social issues and pressures that may or may not be…"
8 minutes ago
Jones joined Colton Wilson's group
Thumbnail

Boyhood Restored

I believe that boys should use their time primarily to prepare for manhood. This group is for young men, dads, and other men who have opinions they'd like to share on how boys should grow up or be raised.
1 hour ago
John Muir replied to John Muir's discussion Bulk Shopping For Staples
"I drink a lot of probiotic yogurt and pop the fiber pills... I don't want to get too gross but suffice to say that were my toilet to write a customer review on Amazon, it would say "The package arrived on time and in the desired…"
1 hour ago
John Muir replied to Andrew D, USA Ret's discussion Militias, politics, anti-2nd amendment hysteria and the Bundy issue in the group The Great Debate
"There was no mockery in my reply to your bizarre, paranoid, flat-out wrong description of the circumstances surrounding the closure of the refinery. Just facts 'n' stuff.  I really think you should get "men skilled in the…"
2 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Andrew D, USA Ret's discussion Militias, politics, anti-2nd amendment hysteria and the Bundy issue in the group The Great Debate
"I'll see your Grayson and raise you a Wasserman-Schultz."
2 hours ago
Vytautas replied to Zachary Gougar's discussion Greek help in the group The Philhellenes
"What verbs or nouns specifically are you wrestling with?"
3 hours ago
Andrew D, USA Ret replied to Andrew D, USA Ret's discussion Militias, politics, anti-2nd amendment hysteria and the Bundy issue in the group The Great Debate
"Amazing, Johnny - something we can agree on."
3 hours ago
Andrew D, USA Ret replied to Andrew D, USA Ret's discussion Militias, politics, anti-2nd amendment hysteria and the Bundy issue in the group The Great Debate
"J.L.P:  "In contrast to you, I could not possibly care less about your opinion of me. Positive or negative." On the contrary, Johnny.  You crave attention.  You are just as narcissistic as you claim Josh to be, and who you…"
3 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service