Does the alt-right even exist? When the left speaks of it, it usually means people who post cartoon frogs and are barely even right sometimes. I know some actual fascists, and the only people who call themselves "alt-right" are universally hated edgelords like Richard Spencer. So what does it mean? I've heard some people say it used to be something close to libertarianism. Personally I think that whatever it meant before, it has become meaningless now. Same as calling someone "literally Hitler." Hence the thread title.
The dreaded "alt-right" announced a rally. They got permission. National Guard was put on standby in case trouble starts. Antifa/BLM responds. Sure enough, trouble starts. They initiated it, not the white nationalists. So why are the white nationalists getting the blame?
You conservatives baffle me. This is just like the Milo and Coulter thing. Someone who has a career of pissing off the other side, gets flustered and plays innocent when the other side calls them on their shit. Whiny cunts that hate everyone not them are triggered when the voters approve removing a statue of someone who led open rebellion against our nation and lost. They march at night through a campus they don't attend, talking about how shit is fucked up because of every race but them. And people show up to call them in their idiot shit.
Any party, showing up, does not get to play innocent to anything.
And people show up to call them in their idiot shit.
If by that you mean literally spray them with piss, then yes. You liberals baffle me.
Do you believe in the white power movement?
Always hated that saying. Of course there are stupid questions.
Yet here we are. Your posts defend them, excuse their actions and who they are, and you can't simply state that you do not support them.
Of course I don't support them. It's just that the media bias is so obvious, someone who isn't WN can see it. It was a lawful assembly until the antifa animals came in and literally started pissing on everything. Yet even Fox refers to Unite the Right as WN, which is fair because they are, but refers to Soros's people merely as "activists." The reaction to what was a non-violent rally is more disgusting than the people holding the rally. As is the media's biased coverage.