NPR: Feds Can't Enforce Net Neutrality: What This Means For You

I'm not going to agree or disagree with their decision on the legality of this, but this is really a shame. Internet in the United States is already garbage. Internet companies are already able to monopolize local markets. Now, they are going to push their content at you. The way I see this playing out: We are going to have to deal with throttled speeds for certain content or have to pay above and beyond their ridiculous prices to gain access to that content.

Views: 58

Replies to This Discussion

I'd say that by calling it a shame, you do disagree with something!

I don't know where you're coming from.  There are a variety of ISP's, not one per local market.  Striking down "net neutrality" doesn't change the status quo, but rather preserves it, so we can expect things to go as before.  "Net neutrality" was meant to change that.  And with status quo, prices are as they are (of course) and ISP's don't push content at you, unless you count inviting you to use their home page, which you can ignore.

On my tablet so bare with me, I'll post something more I'm depth later. Net neutrality has always been the status quo. Data has always been treated the same, no matter where it originated. Companies throttling data to certain sites or programs to milk customers and businesses for more money is bs. It is censorship for profit. Also yes I do disagree, just not necessarily the legality, but this is definitely unethical in my opinion.

IMHO, the real sticking point is that the court is apparently holding that since signal over wire technology is involved, the internet is nothing more than a very, very, fast telephone system.

It is however, giving the service providers the implicit right ro self regulate and monitor the content of internet carried communications transmitted via their individual systems.  Considering the furor that's erupted over the NSA collecting metadata and monitoring some communications content, it's interesting that the court has determined that private industry enjoys permissions and rights regarding electronic commnications than the individual communicator or the government.

Your internet speeds are already being throttled by pricing. Do you honestly believe that the low dollar speed is physically connected to a different hardware set than the high dollar speeds? If that were the case you would see consistent slow speed. Monitor you speed and CPU usage. You will find it pulsates. That is  because it is all ONE speed with a throttle switch in the SW. I don't really see your point on that score.

My understanding of net neutrality is that ISPs (for now) can not be closed organizations wherein partners buy in and you only receive access to and ads from those partners. If that changes it would function a lot like television where if you want to watch a specific program, you must tune in to that particular channel. The problem would be you would only have one channel, your ISP.  I can't really envision the consumer tolerating that sort of clap-trap but I am always amazed at the stupidity of my fellow Americans en mas. All it would take is one guy with the genius to provide an ISP alternative that does not operate that way and poof! The house of cards tumbles.

Capitalism

RSS

Latest Activity

John Lee Pettimore posted a status
"I swear to God it's like I live in a trailer of common sense and stare out the window at a tornado of stupidity."
21 minutes ago
Will replied to Andreias's discussion proactively dealing with anger
"Let us know how that goes."
26 minutes ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to Andreias's discussion proactively dealing with anger
"6Thou shalt not post stupid shit on the internet."
34 minutes ago
George Husted replied to Andreias's discussion proactively dealing with anger
"The husband must fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. 4The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the…"
44 minutes ago
Tarquin Anstruther replied to PSharikov's discussion Anyone else sick to death of MANLY-discussions?
"just reading the rant about what is manly, I see this as a site where men can be themselves and eschew stereotypes and discuss anything and everything rather than the domain of the macho thug, and that includes discussions about underwear if people…"
1 hour ago
Will replied to Stuart Charles's discussion Moneys... and what to do with em
"Serious question.  The man saved $10K Australian over the past year.  Does Ramsey have anything to offer him at this point?"
1 hour ago
Will replied to Stuart Charles's discussion Moneys... and what to do with em
"I should point out that saving and spending aren't the only uses for money.  Our 4-y-o has 3 piggy banks:  saving, spending, and sharing.  Frugality is a virtue, to be sure.  So's generosity."
1 hour ago
Will replied to Pale Horse's discussion On Diversity in the group The Great Debate
"I do.  We got rid of the nastier aspects of Southern culture.  And replaced them with nasty aspects imported from the North."
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service