NPR: Feds Can't Enforce Net Neutrality: What This Means For You

I'm not going to agree or disagree with their decision on the legality of this, but this is really a shame. Internet in the United States is already garbage. Internet companies are already able to monopolize local markets. Now, they are going to push their content at you. The way I see this playing out: We are going to have to deal with throttled speeds for certain content or have to pay above and beyond their ridiculous prices to gain access to that content.

Views: 61

Replies to This Discussion

I'd say that by calling it a shame, you do disagree with something!

I don't know where you're coming from.  There are a variety of ISP's, not one per local market.  Striking down "net neutrality" doesn't change the status quo, but rather preserves it, so we can expect things to go as before.  "Net neutrality" was meant to change that.  And with status quo, prices are as they are (of course) and ISP's don't push content at you, unless you count inviting you to use their home page, which you can ignore.

On my tablet so bare with me, I'll post something more I'm depth later. Net neutrality has always been the status quo. Data has always been treated the same, no matter where it originated. Companies throttling data to certain sites or programs to milk customers and businesses for more money is bs. It is censorship for profit. Also yes I do disagree, just not necessarily the legality, but this is definitely unethical in my opinion.

IMHO, the real sticking point is that the court is apparently holding that since signal over wire technology is involved, the internet is nothing more than a very, very, fast telephone system.

It is however, giving the service providers the implicit right ro self regulate and monitor the content of internet carried communications transmitted via their individual systems.  Considering the furor that's erupted over the NSA collecting metadata and monitoring some communications content, it's interesting that the court has determined that private industry enjoys permissions and rights regarding electronic commnications than the individual communicator or the government.

Your internet speeds are already being throttled by pricing. Do you honestly believe that the low dollar speed is physically connected to a different hardware set than the high dollar speeds? If that were the case you would see consistent slow speed. Monitor you speed and CPU usage. You will find it pulsates. That is  because it is all ONE speed with a throttle switch in the SW. I don't really see your point on that score.

My understanding of net neutrality is that ISPs (for now) can not be closed organizations wherein partners buy in and you only receive access to and ads from those partners. If that changes it would function a lot like television where if you want to watch a specific program, you must tune in to that particular channel. The problem would be you would only have one channel, your ISP.  I can't really envision the consumer tolerating that sort of clap-trap but I am always amazed at the stupidity of my fellow Americans en mas. All it would take is one guy with the genius to provide an ISP alternative that does not operate that way and poof! The house of cards tumbles.

Capitalism

RSS

Latest Activity

Nick H replied to Bryon Perona's discussion The Masculinity of Jesus in the group Christian Men
"I know a few transgendered people (one was a friend as a man before he became a women and now a friend as a woman) and none come from abusive/neglected homes as far as I am aware"
1 hour ago
Nick H replied to Bryon Perona's discussion The Masculinity of Jesus in the group Christian Men
"Even if that stat was true, what percent of people with absent or abusive fathers grow up without gender issues? You have to watch out for those confounding variables when discussing statistics"
1 hour ago
Kyle Aldridge replied to Bryon Perona's discussion The Masculinity of Jesus in the group Christian Men
"Just reading the title of this post, the first thought that comes to mind?  Why the **** do you care?  Jesus came to bring salvation, not to define masculinity. Refocus your attention, before it's too late."
3 hours ago
Kyle Aldridge replied to Joshua Whitworth's discussion Prayers and Ideas for struggling men. in the group Christian Men
"All you want is prayers?  So... what, you can get an overwhelming feeling from deep inside on what course of action to take? No offense, but in my 30+ years of being a Christian, the majority of people looking for "prayers" simply…"
3 hours ago
Julio Montes replied to Karl Helweg's discussion Manliest Vehicle You Actually Own(ed)
"The coolest vehicle that I have ever owned is my first car, a Dodge Charger. Pros - looks and is a beast, its a muscle car, American lol, and worked hard to buy it with my own money Cons - gas mileage "
3 hours ago
Michael Nuta replied to Michael Nuta's discussion Blazer question?
"Well, for a jacket it's pretty much a steal, but I try not to spend money needlessly. However you do make a point, and if I think about it, maybe if I have it in my closet I'll find ways to wear it."
3 hours ago
Rood Andersson replied to Brown Fox's discussion Is this photo inappropriate for public school? in the group The Shirtless Man
"Perhaps people would be less shocked if part of your pants were visible, but, as always, it's what people imagine that causes a problem.   For all they know you are stark naked.  It must be remembered that today's…"
4 hours ago
Phillip T joined Elliott Jason Ridgway's group
Thumbnail

Canine Enthusiasts

This group is for Men who own dogs, train dogs, breed dogs, & dog lovers in general. The purpose for this group is to share ideas or stories about the Man/ Dog relationship... suggested books, games, tricks, techniques, or otherwise.See More
4 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service