NPR: Feds Can't Enforce Net Neutrality: What This Means For You

I'm not going to agree or disagree with their decision on the legality of this, but this is really a shame. Internet in the United States is already garbage. Internet companies are already able to monopolize local markets. Now, they are going to push their content at you. The way I see this playing out: We are going to have to deal with throttled speeds for certain content or have to pay above and beyond their ridiculous prices to gain access to that content.

Views: 62

Replies to This Discussion

I'd say that by calling it a shame, you do disagree with something!

I don't know where you're coming from.  There are a variety of ISP's, not one per local market.  Striking down "net neutrality" doesn't change the status quo, but rather preserves it, so we can expect things to go as before.  "Net neutrality" was meant to change that.  And with status quo, prices are as they are (of course) and ISP's don't push content at you, unless you count inviting you to use their home page, which you can ignore.

On my tablet so bare with me, I'll post something more I'm depth later. Net neutrality has always been the status quo. Data has always been treated the same, no matter where it originated. Companies throttling data to certain sites or programs to milk customers and businesses for more money is bs. It is censorship for profit. Also yes I do disagree, just not necessarily the legality, but this is definitely unethical in my opinion.

IMHO, the real sticking point is that the court is apparently holding that since signal over wire technology is involved, the internet is nothing more than a very, very, fast telephone system.

It is however, giving the service providers the implicit right ro self regulate and monitor the content of internet carried communications transmitted via their individual systems.  Considering the furor that's erupted over the NSA collecting metadata and monitoring some communications content, it's interesting that the court has determined that private industry enjoys permissions and rights regarding electronic commnications than the individual communicator or the government.

Your internet speeds are already being throttled by pricing. Do you honestly believe that the low dollar speed is physically connected to a different hardware set than the high dollar speeds? If that were the case you would see consistent slow speed. Monitor you speed and CPU usage. You will find it pulsates. That is  because it is all ONE speed with a throttle switch in the SW. I don't really see your point on that score.

My understanding of net neutrality is that ISPs (for now) can not be closed organizations wherein partners buy in and you only receive access to and ads from those partners. If that changes it would function a lot like television where if you want to watch a specific program, you must tune in to that particular channel. The problem would be you would only have one channel, your ISP.  I can't really envision the consumer tolerating that sort of clap-trap but I am always amazed at the stupidity of my fellow Americans en mas. All it would take is one guy with the genius to provide an ISP alternative that does not operate that way and poof! The house of cards tumbles.

Capitalism

RSS

Latest Activity

Patrick H. posted a discussion

Rowing

Hey folks. I couldn't find a thread about this when I searched for one, so here's a new query for the site. What does AoM think of rowing? I've just taken the sport up and am curious to hear if anyone else has experience, insight, or advice to share.See More
18 minutes ago
Josh100LuBu replied to Tom Baker's discussion Masculinities and social class
"PH is just an idiot but John has a clear agenda of envy towards me and everything I represent. A terrible understanding of competitive bodybuilding and a personal vendetta against all who succeed in what they love. You try to use the steroid…"
44 minutes ago
Cthulhu's Revenge replied to Tom Baker's discussion Masculinities and social class
"England cares about social class, especially in the south. The rest of the UK doesn't"
45 minutes ago
Leto Atreides II replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"Brilliant. So did we."
1 hour ago
Leto Atreides II replied to Tom Baker's discussion Masculinities and social class
"Whatever you want to spend your money on is fine with me. If spending the equivalent of what a nice home costs on a wristwatch makes you happy (and you can afford it) I'm happy for you. If you're buying a car you can't afford to try…"
1 hour ago
Tom Baker replied to Tom Baker's discussion Masculinities and social class
"Thanks to those of you that have completed my survey, really appreciate it."
1 hour ago
Martin Grier posted a status
"Just back from Malta saw a modern take on Caravaggio https://bloggerphotography.wordpress.com/2014/11/27/caravaggio-postbox/"
1 hour ago
Nick H replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"The best response I've ever read to that (young guy mocking old guys about the internet) was an older guy pointing out that they created the internet while the young, ignorant to coding, are just end users."
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service