Several interesting blog posts on transgender-ness; I was particularly interested in the first, a guest post.  

I have a burning psychological need for the statement “I am a man” to be true, so it would be nice if it weren’t meaningless. It would also be nice if it weren’t immutably false.

Author doesn't have an answer, but does seem willing to frame the questions.


Later in the page I came across the phrase "the cotton ceiling," and googled it.

Cotton ceiling is the tendency of trans women to be excluded from the higher echelons of (cis-dominated) women's and queer spaces — specifically within the porn industry... [link]

where "cotton" refers to underwear, or, rather, what's in it.

And from another source:

Basically, it means that cis queer women will be friends with us and talk day and night about trans rights and ending transmisogyny, but will still not consider us viable sexual partners. [link]

Found some real rage on this issue:  someone angry at "cisbians saying 'I'm just not attracted to penises''s because you're a sad little transmisogynist and you deserve to have your teeth beaten in."  

No real conclusion here yet, at least, not one the parties can agree on.

Views: 98

Replies to This Discussion

Interesting that you brought this up. I just heard of the "cotton ceiling" yesterday. MtF trannies are pissed off that lesbians don't want to have sex with 'chicks' with dicks. They find it 'transphobic', discriminatory, and believe that it invalidates their womanhood (which is already on shaky ground). Feminists are pissed off that MtF trannies are trying to use a SJW guilt trip and namecalling to force lesbians to have sex with men against their will.

What to do when the dual mythologies of 'transphobia' and 'rape culture' collide. What an absurd shit-show.

There is a fundamental philosophical schism between the feminists and the trannies that is starting to get louder, and very well could burn this whole 'intersectional' SJW nonsense to the ground. There were even some vocal radical feminists that joined-up with conservatives on the 'bathroom bill' push.

Modern progressive and radical feminism, at its core, claims that men and women are mentally and emotionally identical at birth and that social pressure ultimately separates the genders into masculine and feminine. They believe gender is a social construct. They believe that biological sex is static, and that women are discriminated against simply because of their biology. They believe that biological women need special protection from biological men, who are raised to be domineering and aggressive ... and to subjugate women.

Tranny philosophy, at its core, claims that gender is ingrained at birth -- by way of a 'male brain' or a 'female brain'. They believe that gender is a core trait of birth, not a social construct, and, after they 'transition' they tend to embrace the very stereotypical masculinity and femininity that feminists claim is a 'social construct. They believe biological sex is irrelevant, and that there exists such a thing as "a woman with a penis" or "a man who menstruates and gives birth" -- science be damned. Thus, while they may agree that women need special protection from men ... they believe they belong on the other side of that protection. They're not men. They're women with penises. So, women don't need protection from them.

There is simply no "intersectionality" between those philosophies. They are diametrically opposed. Mutually assured destruction, hopefully ... and maybe they'll bring the whole house of cards down in the process.


This reminds of me of something I've encountered among gay men.  If you go on a dating site or hook-up app such as Grindr, you will see a lot of profiles that will explicitly exclude certain types of guys, such as Black men, Asians, "femmes," etc.  Which, I've heard, is racist or otherwise discriminatory.  I don't understand that, though, because how does one control who they are attracted to?  I've never heard anyone call gay men sexist for refusing to date women (it wouldn't surprise me to find an article saying just that at Salon or something, but it's not a mainstream position either way).  As silly as the antics of radical feminists often seem, the notion that lesbians ought to sleep with women who have (or had) male parts out of some sense of political correctness is even sillier.  

"If you go on a dating site or hook-up app such as Grindr, you will see a lot of profiles that will explicitly exclude certain types of guys, such as Black men, Asians, "femmes," etc.  Which, I've heard, is racist or otherwise discriminatory"

It is racist and discriminatory. There's no question about that. You're excluding people based on their race. That's the very definition of racist discrimination. The real question is whether or not, in that specific context, that racist discrimination is wrong.

Dating is inherently discriminatory. That's the whole purpose. To discriminate. To choose. To weed-out people you don't like for any and every reason. I'd hate to see the trainwreck of a life that nondiscriminatory dating would create.

Sex discrimination is usually the starting point, which I figure does hurt trannies ... because, "neither", "both", or "horribly confused" probably aren't sought after all that often. Beyond that -- people discriminate on age, height, weight, race, skin-tone, disability, orientation, hairstyle, religion, boob size, intelligence, wealth, earning potential, hygiene, education, political ideology, waist-to-hip ratio, parental marital status, fashion sense ... essentially everything.

In this case ... it's better to aim for 'discriminating taste' than 'nondiscriminatory'. Be as discriminatory as possible.


Technically true, but beside the point: the clear implication is that the racism, in this instance, is wrong.  Which it's not; dating someone you're not attracted to out of some sense of social justice or whatever doesn't seem like a healthy relationship, and it's definitely not fair to the other person if they don't know what the deal is.  

"Take me down to the transgender city, where the chicks have dicks and the guys have titties."


Latest Activity

Jack Bauer replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"Ideally not. Best I can tell, your complaint is that men -- particularly Asian or Korean men -- aren't into dark-skinned women. You say your parents immigrated to the U.S., so it doesn't sound like you live in Asia. You call yourself a…"
2 hours ago
Drew Wood replied to Chris J.'s discussion Taking a nature walk...barechested in the group The Shirtless Man
"That is a great feeling, especially on a warm Spring day!"
4 hours ago
Kit the Odd replied to Sir's discussion Class in the group The Great Debate
"I'll have to think about this some more, but one things comes to mind right off. The volatility of the classes makes for some of the mismatches you mention.  Purely income-wise I grew up probably somewhere between middle-class and…"
8 hours ago
Apollyon replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"Nope. 1. You seem to have self-loathing, low self esteem, and bad self image. 2. You live in Korea? Asian countries can be tough to deal with if you are not Asian. However, I can tell you many other countries in the world DO in fact like black…"
8 hours ago
Tyler West replied to N. R.'s discussion Any Wildland Firefighters out there?
"Hey man, Just saw this and figured Id reply. I was a BLM/Forest Service firefighter for four years, two on engines and last two on a hotshot crew. The biggest thing honestly is calling and or visiting fire captains to show your interest. Some of…"
8 hours ago
Kit the Odd replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"I'm not sure what I could say to help, although I'd like to.  It sounds like you are dealing with some specific problems that feel like general ones.  I don't know what your experiences are, but they sound…"
8 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Valentin's discussion Hello from Paris (France)
"Welcome. I hope you enjoy being here. Feel free to chime in anywhere."
10 hours ago
Sir replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"Isn't it obvious?  She's gone to an almost all-male, mostly white, board, to see if she gets honored or trashed.  Because she is in such distress that she, well, makes that post.  I'd say she's been trashed enough.…"
11 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service