Just read this article, saw links on my facebooks to other sources saying the same thing.

Before my head explodes, would the resident conservatives please walk me off the cliff and explain this to me in a way I might understand.

Cause honestly, my initial reactions are that this is exactly why my nation won't ever be great again.

Views: 1056

Replies to This Discussion

The flaw with your example is that the revolutionaries didn't have a problem with educated people; they had a problem with educated Tsarists. Marx, Lenin, Stalin (etc.) were all highly educated and they did not discourage education among non-Tsarists. In fact, many of them believed that the logical conclusion any truly educated person would come to is that communism and socialism were the best possible outcomes for society.

So the same thing as...

I don't have a problem with science, just these clown scientists running these biased experiments.

I don't have a problem with the media, just these clown journalists running these biased articles.

Bless your little heart, you do try

So the same thing as...

I don't have a problem with science, just these clown scientists running these biased experiments.

I don't have a problem with the media, just these clown journalists running these biased articles.

I actually agree completely.  It's just like that.  Glad you're on board.  Disagreeing with the warped performance of individual practitioners of a discipline -- even a lot of them -- is not disagreement with the discipline itself.


JB

It was said with all the mockery and disdain that I also have for the misguided belief of "hate the sin, love the sinner"

Why do you have a problem with that concept?  I see it as the same basic concept as "disagree without being disagreeable". 

Do you actually have a problem with the concept, or just with how poorly most people implement it?

Good question!

If I have to be honest, it would be my "perception" on the implementation.

As a concept, it isn't that bad, but I think we could fill up a massive thread on things that as a concept sound good, but fall flat on implementation.

Now you're getting it.

My experience has been that conservatives disdain higher learning because they get frustrated when academia doesn't bend to their political views.

It's not that academia is pushing a liberal agenda. My experience is that it doesn't have a coordinated agenda at all. Most professors can't coordinate their own clothes. Professors and researchers, particularly in the humanities, happen to be professionals more concerned with the small world of academic debates which they inhabit. Conservatives' problems seem to come in when such research doesn't prove conservative cultural talking points, because conservatives tend to politicize every area of life. So if academic research is apolitical, it represents a threat to such pan-politicization. Therefore that research, and those who carry it out, are cast as outsiders and un-American. It puts a damper on intellectual public discourse.

Zero Self Reflection: The Post

It's not that academia is pushing a liberal agenda. My experience is that it doesn't have a coordinated agenda at all. Most professors can't coordinate their own clothes.

And the Democrats can't coordinate their own Presidential campaign, but that doesn't mean that they don't have an agenda. Your post is 100% assertion with 0% facts or even examples.

Clearly, you're not especially well versed in "intersectionality" -- the overarching theory meant to unite the 'humanities', and professors thereof, in social liberal lockstep.  It's so well enforced that some poor LIBERAL professor was literally threatened off campus for failing to abide by a "no white people" day.

This is a direct quote from a recent Harvard Divinity School Job Posting ...

It is understood that applicants will employ forms of analysis that address race, gender, sexuality, and/or other intersecting forms of social power, such as womanist, feminist, and/or queer approaches.

https://chroniclevitae.com/jobs/0000374062-01

When that is an explicit part of the hiring criteria for a professor of Divinity at an elite school ... how is that not pushing a "liberal agenda"?  I can't see a scenario where any non-liberal could be even considered for that job.  In a Divinity school.


How could conservatives not have a "negative view" of that?

National Review ran an interesting column on the topic recently ...

'Here's How Anti-Conservative Academic Discrimination Works'

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449232/conservatives-face-dis...

JB

RSS

Latest Activity

Pale Horse replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Not really but ok"
3 hours ago
Dominic replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Actually, southern statues are dropping left and right. "
3 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"And they've already clumsily given away their endgame. Look at the links I posted in this thread. And there's also this: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9kkkby/lets-get-rid-of-mount-rushmore I have screenshot proof that original title…"
3 hours ago
Sir replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"This is the video I was trying to show in the previous post:  "
4 hours ago
Sir replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Yes. They are history (if they are old) and celebrations. I find it horrific that we're now getting into making rationales for destroying art. Like this:  memorials to the Pharaohs, self-aggrandizing hierarchs who used massive amounts of…"
4 hours ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Political violence isn't new to the US or the modern world. Italy had the years of lead - we're nowhere near that. The UK has a strong Antifa counter culture - they're not losing anything for it. The only reason the US goes…"
7 hours ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
8 hours ago
Dominic replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"In regard to Confederate memorials, perhaps Robert E. Lee's response to an invitation to mark Gettysburg with monuments is pertinent (emphasis my own): Dear Sir--Absence from Lexington has prevented my receiving until to-day your letter of the…"
9 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service