Without getting into whether there are or aren't gods, I'd like to do some research on you guys.

Atheists in my experience, without an exception to date, are an environmentally-minded crowd.  They tend to vehemently oppose anything that looks like industrial wrecking of nature, believing as they do that this Earth is the only one we've got and that no higher power will stop us from mortally wounding it.

Many atheists will also bring this up against religion: the whole dominion of the earth, the expectation of the end times and the new earth, the call to be hard-working and industrious, the call to have children (overpopulation), and the idea that god wouldn't allow us to affect the climate, etc. etc.  To many it seems religion has a "whatever, it's all going to be destroyed anyway" attitude.

But I know religious people aplenty, however, who think the Creator is to be seen in nature and NOT in man-made things, and therefore removing the influence of nature from people could be seen as pulling them away from the influence of god.  There are certainly many people of faith who felt called to protect the environment or work in environmental conservation.

How do your beliefs affect your attitude about the environment?

For those of any faith, how does your faith affect your regard for the environment, or does it at all?  For those who in the "this is the only life I've got" crowd, how do you feel about it?  If you call yourself an environmentalist, what is the reason?

Views: 1439

Replies to This Discussion

When you talk numbers in china it always amazes me. Take Christians for example, they are an extreme minority there yet their are more Christians in china than in either Germany or Italy, just due to sheer population size.

I lived near the Chinese community in Ottawa once and heard through friends that every now and then you could rent a cheap apartment there that the locals won't touch due to poor fengshui.

What is the folk religion called in china? Or is that just an umbrella term for a vast collection of various traditions in china?
The world is still a big place. I'm glad to hear it.

I believe religion/faith and environmental consciousness are unrelated.

I think taking environmental crisis seriously and noting its rapid decline is smart and logical, and to put religious biases or use ignorance as an excuse is just unmanly. There's irrefutable evidence of our oceans decline; rising acidity levels and the landmass of trash accumulating in the Pacific, not to mention the changes of fish population and levels of radiation in their meat.  

Personally, religion and faith for me is like a private relationship. It's helpful and lends support, but as soon as it starts affecting other decisions and clouding logic or judgement, it's overstepping my boundaries.

I can comment some on the computer model issue.  I am not an expert on simulation, but I am on CS generally.

When I was planning to be an astronomer (before I found how cool CS is), I was fascinated by the TTAPS study (letters are for its authors; S is Sagan).  These scientists noticed that when there's a dust storm on Mars, the surface temperature plummets as sunlight is blocked.  They made a computer simulation to see what would happen on Earth if a nuclear war kicked up dust and smoke.  They found significant temperature drop.  Thence the term "nuclear winter."

Naturally they wanted to make the model more accurate.  It was vastly oversimplified:  no layering of the atmosphere, no latitudes, no oceans, no weather.

As they added details, the results changed.  Unlike Mars, Earth has a weather layer distinct from the stratosphere.  The nuclear war wouldn't get dust and smoke into the stratosphere (where it would take a long time to settle); it would stay in the weather layer, where it would be washed out by precipitation.  The oceans would do a lot to moderate the climate.  Nuclear winter became nuclear autumn and then nuclear cold snap.

Climate models have a similar problem.  CO2 does a lot to block infrared radiation... unless there's water vapor in the atmosphere, which already blocks that radiation, and the equatorial regions are saturated with it.  It's tough to say what increased CO2 would do to cloud cover.  If it increases it, Earth is more reflective (cooler) and better insulated (warmer).  If it decreases it, go with the reverse.

Climate models (so I read -- this is not direct knowledge) have so far been unable to even predict the past.  They require fudge factors to work for one period, but then can't predict another time period. 

However you want to understand global temperatures... best not trust the models yet.  When they can predict the past, then we can have some confidence they'll predict the future.  That's not within our capabilities yet.

While talking about climate change is a worthwhile conversation in and of itself, could we please steer back towards the main question?

I still want to know how your beliefs, actively or passively, affect your outlook on the environment.  How do they affect your actions toward the environment?  If they don't, why not?  I appreciate those who have shared what they do/don't do to help the environment.

A big thank you to Tesh for trying to get back on topic.  I like what you said about faith being like a personal relationship that lends you support, but it doesn't dictate all your decisions.

Please sound off if you are a non-green-minded atheist please so you can be the first exception to my experience of all atheists being very green-minded.  Any very green religious people want to get into the doctrine of environmental stewardship and how they practice it?

First off... are you new to TGD? We rabbit trail. Alot.

Second. Have you ever met anyone, atheist or not, who actually admits that they willingly destroy the environment?

1.  Actually, yes I am.  But I know you get off topic.  That's fine.  I just think saying anything about climate change is going to end in chasing our tails around that.  The ones who don't value evidence will continue to be given evidence and continue to not value it.

2.  No, I haven't.  But it's easy to see them give faux lip service to the environment issue and see through to the fact that they really don't care.  They may not say it, but they as much as tell us by how they speak about it.

I answered your question. Millions of soviets and billions of Chinese have already disproved your theory that atheism = environmentalism.

Chinese are extremely religious, and Christianity is all over Russia.  The leaders of those countries might not be particularly religious in a political sense.  Fair enough.  I'd accept that atheists in power aren't caring about the environment.  But I'd have to say the same about all the American presidents who claim to be religious, as well as all the other world leaders who are religious.

I think though if you look at several Nordic countries, you'd see atheist leaders who make the environment a huge priority.

What I glean from you point is that personal beliefs of politicians aren't as powerful as other political influences.

But what about individual people upon whom rests fewer pressures?

You have a few friends who are atheists and like the environment. I'm not sure how this draws the conclusion that the two are connected.

These are great points.  Worth adding to this discussion.  This reminds me of Bron Taylor, a professor whom a good friend of mine had the fortune of studying under.

He talks about "dark green religion" as being apparent in movies like Avatar.

From wikipedia:

dark green religion

What Taylor says about surfers is very true.  Except for the drug-head beach bum surfers, I'd say most surfers I know form a kind of cult of submission to nature, as I see happening in my own life.  Surfing forms spiritual bonds between people and coaxes you to love civilization less and the chaotic nature of the natural world more, especially the sea.

RSS

Latest Activity

Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"A few random bits that I have not confirmed, and don't know who to believe on. Trump up from 3.1% to 19.6% among black voters, over 2 weeks.…"
1 hour ago
Linda Harper updated their profile
5 hours ago
Lumpy52403 replied to David Salley's discussion Tucking in with shorts
"I agree with Tom (above). I almost always tuck shirts in, whether I'm wearing shorts, jeans, or pants. Even tank tops get tucked in."
8 hours ago
Shannon N. Clark replied to Pale Horse's discussion Is __ Manly?
"burn"
9 hours ago
Travis Prater joined Buffalo Bill's group
Thumbnail

Everyday Carry

A group to discuss those objects we carry every day, and the balance between utility, effectiveness, and sentimentality.
10 hours ago
Travis Prater joined Stephen Larsen's group
Thumbnail

Miskatonic University

A group to celebrate all things within the Cthulu Mythos created by H.P. Lovecraft.  Share your love of the board/roleplaying games and the stories they are based off of.See More
10 hours ago
David R. replied to Devster's discussion MBA - is it worth it?
"My brother found out the hard way that you need to get an MBA from an institution with a prominent reputation.  In other words, not every MBA is the same.  My brother got an MBA from a small college in a small town and it did him no good…"
10 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Not hold off, just creep a little slower. I'm hoping one of her little seizures occurs during the debate."
10 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service