http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/13/16949097-pregnant-texas-...

Teen want's to keep her unborn baby while her parents want to force her to have an abortion. I do not believe those on the left are actually for choice like they say they are. They are pro abortion so I am assuming they will keep quiet in this matter. I'm not talking about the people who post here. I'm talking about the loud vocal pro-choice leftists in our country. Those women who claim to be for women's rights will never in a million years stand up for this young woman's right to keep her child. They will remain quiet on this matter.

Views: 947

Replies to This Discussion

Yikes. I don't think anyone should be forced to have an abortion. A parent's authority over their child does not go this far. 

Pro choice does not and should not mean this. It means that teen has the choice to keep the child or not. 

I sure hope some national voices on the side that favors abortion will take the opportunity to show how reasonable they are. It is really getting ugly.

The last national hysteria bout on abortion ended up with the DNC trying to prove that Mr. Romney & the GOP hate women.

I even heard some CNN guy try to talk sense into the DNC Chaircritter. She was admirably adamant that lying about a press article is justified because it says the truth about the GOP & its candidate. I believe 'fake but accurate' is the term of art, after Mr. Rather's hit piece of 2004.

The reporter seemed to me weak, personifying liberalism, & the Chaircritter tough-minded, personifying the left. Compare that with the way the GOP immediately threw out that guy with the weird talk about abortion not resulting in rape. Sometimes it strikes me that the GOP has better liberals than the Dems...

I think the "national hysteria" was the concern that Republican Congressman simply did not take rape, excuse me, "legitimate rape" seriously.  The DNC didn't have to spin that any more than there was any need to spin 47%.  When you have weak gaffe's, both sides spin.  On the Dem side witness the GHW Bush can't use a grocery scanner thing.  With legitimate rape, there is a saying in the business that if your opponent is hanging himself don't get in the way.

I hope you are joking, this is part of your elaborate sense of irony, pointing out that liberals do not even know that the man was not a Rep. of either party, but merely a candidate who made that comment at some time after the primary, but before the election. The party, despite the primary, treated the guy like a leper. Whence the association then? Ask the DNC.

As for the Mr. Bush, Sr., that was a flat out lie, but a persuasive lie. I do not mind the use of lies in politics, although it is vile & petty; I somewhat resent that in talking about politics, however.

1. The "party" split, at least if you see the party as activist, donors, pols, staffers, actual party officials, and friendly media (which voters and political scientists do see them as.
2. Like it or not, any statewide candidate in a competitive is a defacing party rep, to the voters and the media.
3. Sure it was a lie, so spin was necessary. Another such lie was the apology tour thing.

You mean Mr. Obama's apology tour? Or am I mistaking it for something else?

Sure. But it's just an example. Fake scandals happen all the time, and both sides shop em around. You don't need to shop more solid stuff so hard.

What exact proportion of liberals do you think make up this "loud vocal pro-choice leftists" that openly and actively support forced abortions?

I expect crickets.

My point is that they will be silent on this because they are not pro-choice they are pro-abortion. I don't really care what percentage it is. It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to see through the lie that is pro-choice.

As for the moderates, less liberal and the rest of the regular folk who claim they are pro-choice they are in swell company. Other notable pro-choice people in history are those in the South who didn't own slaves but supported the right to own and enslave other humans, and lots of Germans who went along with the killing of millions of untermentions; they like didn't you know support it but you know who are they to say killing a human is wrong you know.

Ok, want to get this straight.

We have a girl with worthless parents that she doesn't even live with. They find out she is preggers and want to force her into an abortion. She is fighting to keep the baby.

The facts really aren't important, it is just that you are not immidiatly seeing pro-choice people take to the streets in huge support for this girl, so therefor they must be on the side of the parents. And you take this from intuition based on how you feel about abortion and not from anything silly like actually going out and talking to anybody who is moderate, less liberal or just fucking pro-choice. Percentages aren't important, what is important is how you feel about this. And because you feel like abortion is bad, anyone who might be for abortion in one case must be for it in an absolutely absurd extreme case.

Therefor nazi slavetraders aborting everything up in this biatch
Just man the fuck up and say you hate all people who are pro-choice. We've had several threads on the subject, nothing is going to change, esp from a story as absurd as this one.

I would settle for NOW to come out in support of this young woman or some of the media outlets to come out and demonize the parents. We both know that will not happen.

RSS

Latest Activity

Jack Bauer replied to JSydCarton's discussion And the Fool Speaks
"It isn't always about school.  School is a means to an end, not an end by itself.  Don't go back to school just because you think you're supposed to ... go back if, and only if, there's something you need from it. And,…"
9 minutes ago
Carl Monster replied to LShieldes's discussion Run fat boy run
"Just at week one? Of course you are going to have some pain. Take it slow, and read up on good pain and bad pain; pain from stiffness and lactic acid buildup is good pain, sharp pains that come as you are running or whatever you are doing mean stop…"
14 minutes ago
Sean Grogan replied to Sean Grogan's discussion Opposing a Charter of Secularism in the group Catholic Men
"I totally agree with you, But I am having a hard time convincing people that this isn't right. Most people just don't care enough or feel that these minorites are a threat of ome kind so are willing to sacrifice their rights.…"
15 minutes ago
Paul_of_TX replied to LShieldes's discussion Run fat boy run
"Advil is your friend when running. It works as an anti-inflammatory not just a pain blocker so it really helps after a run. Also since you have a pool take your shoes and wade into the water after your run for 5 to 15 minutes. Just waist deep or…"
16 minutes ago
Stephen Larsen replied to Stephen Larsen's discussion My Experience with PIT Training in the group New Warriors
"It's a necessary risk.  Couldn't be open for connection if I wasn't also vulnerable.  Thank you."
19 minutes ago
Aaron F Kendrick replied to Daniel's discussion What makes a great politician? in the group The Great Debate
"I consider a politician to be interchangeable with tyrant and we are seeing the perfect example in Obama.  What we need are statesmen.  Statesmen respect the founders and the Constitution.  Statesmen would never have butchered the…"
22 minutes ago
Matt L. replied to Matt L.'s discussion Mix and match vests
"Thanks guys, appreciate the input!"
28 minutes ago
Joseph Casson replied to StaggerLee's discussion Are Muslims Silent or Is The Media Negligent? in the group The Great Debate
"The media is always negligent. It makes money that way. 1. Report a story, edited by the media to sell more copies 2. This selective reporting rouses hate amoung the common folk 3. Hate causes riots and other dispute 4. Media makes money reporting…"
32 minutes ago

© 2013   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service