Eric Cantor loses GOP primary to Tea Party upstart

 Thoughts, opinions, gloating?

Views: 999

Replies to This Discussion

Like I put in the general comments section, it shocked the shit out of me. The only non-Texas primary I was watching remotely close was the one with McConnel. I COULD see this happening to Graham though.

I doubt it would happen but I would love to see the moderates of the Rep party and the moderates of the Dem party split off and start another party. Leave the hardline Cons and Libs to their own parties.

Yes, that would be awesome. The only downside is that they would get most of the uninformed or apathetic voters who don't want to choose a side, especially the within independents.

I see it differently. I see the uninformed yet highly emotional getting to go to their extreme party while people with a functional brain stay with the more moderate parties.

I see it about the same as Steve. I personally cannot identify as Repub, or Dem anymore, simply because my political beliefs are scattered all over the place. And I personally feel that, with most of the more informed people that I talk to are about the same way. 

For what its worth, the party "extremes" actually tend to be more informed than the middle.  The ignorant and stupid tend toward ambivalence.


JB

+1

I'm more talking about those who will only read or believe a single source of information that favors their "extreme" views.

Fundamentalists aren't "informed." They are indoctrinated.

What tripe.

+1

Saying it more emphatically doesn't make it truer.  More involved people tend to be more informed.  The 'middle' is typically inactive, ignorant and apathetic ... they don't know and they don't care.  They also don't vote.

Those either side would call 'extremists' are not typically uninformed.  They keep up.  They just disagree fundamentally about how to approach.


JB

This is so much bullshit. Those extremists are mostly informed towards everything that plays into their opinion and are ignorant to everything else. Or do you really think some of those neo nazis recently entering some of europes parlaments are well informed?

Those either side would call 'extremists' are not typically uninformed. 

1. He said what the other side calls extremists. That's Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, etc.

2. There is a difference between informed and understanding. You can have a wealth of information and still be deluded. He is right; those who know what's going on typically take a side. Those who do not are typically ignorant, apathetic, or cowardly.

RSS

Latest Activity

Daniel replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"Give them all the information. The parents will teach them morals at home anyway, no matter what they learn in school."
6 minutes ago
Liam Strain replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"Not sure I follow the argument backing your assertion that risk management is a moral issue."
9 minutes ago
Aarondelrod replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"Also whether promiscuity is bad is purely based on the moral beliefs of the individual. I was attempting to argue that the negative results of promiscuity are bad, unwanted children and stds. If you always take the perfect precautions I suppose…"
11 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"Religious sexual morality doesn't "complicate the issue" any more than does libertine sexual amorality.  Both are simply values systems that people personally choose to live by.  Both are merely voluntary personal values of…"
12 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"Afraid not.  Teaching risk management in sexual activity inherently embarks on morality ... not mere "mechanics and biology". Some would prefer that risk management be taught by use of latex barriers in inevitable premarital sexual…"
16 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"Where exactly are they pushing the morality of it?  Otherwise, replace sex with math/grammer/science/whatever and your argument becomes purely emotional without a lot of reason."
17 minutes ago
Aarondelrod replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"I'm new to this and apologize for the misplaced comments"
17 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"I'll relate it to IT. The safest way against virus(STD)/Trojan(pregnancy) for a PC is to take it off the internet completely(absitinance). Reality says that this just isn't goign to work. So you setup protection programs, you teach your…"
19 minutes ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service