Take the Test Here

Was shown this political social/economic test that places you on a four-way axis, opposites being Libertarianism/Authoritarianism and Left and Right.

Although clearly not completely accurate, it's interesting.

Just thought I'd share this, I found it quite interesting, where do you lie?

My result showed me to be Centre-Right Libertarian: 6.75,-2.41

Views: 1187

Replies to This Discussion

fairly surprised at this

 

There is a fruitful discussion to be had about the questions themselves. For example, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." I assume that agreeing indicates a preference for a certain strain of foreign policy (realpolitik?). What scale am I moving along with that question? And which direction does it move me in?

The racism and nationalism questions raise similar issues. I assume agreeing with either will slide one further towards the right, as I've most often heard Naziism categorized as "far-right". Is this justified by the principles of "right-wing" ideology (which I suddenly am at a loss to define)? And if so, is there a question about eugenics (a favored policy until Hitler made it ugly) to balance things out? It seems to me that the right-left dichotomy is either arbitrary or the creation of academics of a certain persuasion.

And what about the very first one, which places the welfare of trans-national companies in opposition to the interests of humanity regarding who should benefit from globalization? What if I believe that the increased specialization this trend has enabled can benefit both parties? Where do I go now?

And I'm only on page one. I think I'll do the first one for real, and then try and manipulate it into putting me into a target group to see what the authors believe about different ideologies.

"from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" is a fundamentally good idea.

AND

The only social responsibility of a company should be to deliver a profit to its shareholders.

I suspect that personal beliefs (as in, what should people do?) and political beliefs (what should be enforced by law?) are being conflated here. Is this appropriate on a political compass?

Those with the ability to pay should have the right to higher standards of medical care .

There's a vital assumption about the nature of a right being made here.

Governments should penalise businesses that mislead the public. 

Penalize how? By direct regulation of advertising and labeling, or by writing laws allowing those who have been victimized by fraud (also, defining fraud) to bring suit against these businesses?

I've finished page two. I believe the authors are European. I also feel like I'm trapped in a "choose your own adventure" story where the only options are to drop a nuke or hug a puppy, and I don't even have context.

The ideology described in the first sentence is socialism (Right, Shane?).

I'll admit I've read your post, and his, a couple of times, and I'm having trouble following the conversation.

 

Assuming I've figured out what you're asking -- which may be assuming too much -- the base problem is that it requires an external determination of "needs".  Or "ability".  Or "deeds".  That's an awful lot of power over your life to just quit claim to somebody else.

 

Capitalism is the economic system that emerges when people are left alone.  Anything else requires command-and-control of some sort.

 

JB

I thought Bouchard was ranting about the questions ... though most seem to be responding as if his question-restatements were his personal beliefs (which may be what Rick did).

 

I'm still not clear on what Rick was asking, though.  The CEO/janitor example didn't help, so I ignored it and answered the top-line question as if he hadn't elaborated.


JB

Last one:

All people have their rights, but it is better for all of us that different sorts of people should keep to their own kind.

Real answer: I don't care. Given answer: disagree

What do you mean, you people?

The response I was looking for was "What do YOU mean, you people?!?!"

Good attempt.

Most people have a tendency to self-segregate. Whether that means Chinatown, little Italy, all male clubs, or whatever...we do it to ourselves.

The wording of these question made it seems like something that should almost be enforced, and obviously that would be bad...but when you examine the facts, self segregation does tend to have certain benefits.

I take it back. This is the last one:

When you are troubled, it's better not to think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

wut

RSS

Latest Activity

Eric W replied to Eric W's discussion Gilets, Bodywarmers & Down Vests
"Here's a slightly more standard style I went for. I'm hoping to try at rugged look at some point with a casual shirt on under a black vest but I'm not sure what shirt to get so any advice there would be great."
2 hours ago
Jay D replied to Nick H's discussion Has AOM jumped the shark or is it's just cyclical in the group The Great Debate
"The reason why we have a government is that we can go home after work and watch ESPN highlights. We delegated the governing of our country's to our elected officials, because we have other things to do. If out elected officials fail to deliver…"
6 hours ago
Ameretta replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"My apologies for being an inconvenience to you..sike, but on a serious note your statement is a  lie because this issue started long before I came on here. I don't know why you think it's so easy to dismiss this as a perception issue…"
6 hours ago
J. Exalto replied to Sir's discussion The cotton ceiling and other subtleties in the group The Great Debate
"Well I am exclusively (sexually) attracted to a very specific type of guy, which happens to be the type of guy that pretty much describes every guy in the place I grew up (which happens to be almost entirely white).  So I think upbringing…"
7 hours ago
Eric W replied to Skyler G. H. Reep's discussion Interview Attire for Kayaking Guide?
"I would've worn my red puffy vest over a shirt as I'm sure it could pass as a life preserver - shows a concern for aquatic safety."
11 hours ago
Eric W replied to Eric W's discussion Gilets, Bodywarmers & Down Vests
"I'm not gonna ditch my vests, I like wearing them and wear them more than most of my other types of clothes :P I was more looking for suggestions on what other people wear with them."
11 hours ago
Sir replied to Nick H's discussion Has AOM jumped the shark or is it's just cyclical in the group The Great Debate
"I would like to have some info on that too, because I suspect it has."
12 hours ago
Tom Imbach joined Frost's group
Thumbnail

Ian Flemming

Many have seen the movies. But do you know the author behind James Bond.See More
14 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service