Take the Test Here

Was shown this political social/economic test that places you on a four-way axis, opposites being Libertarianism/Authoritarianism and Left and Right.

Although clearly not completely accurate, it's interesting.

Just thought I'd share this, I found it quite interesting, where do you lie?

My result showed me to be Centre-Right Libertarian: 6.75,-2.41

Views: 1189

Replies to This Discussion

Just another leftist talking-point ... trying to mainstream the outside-of-mainstream by claiming Obama isn't what he is.  Clever.  Still not buying it.


JB

You've got it all figured out.

 

Ridicule and dismiss.  You'll have to do better than that.

JB

Why bother? I know I won't be able to convince you otherwise. You're obviously very entrenched in your position; it seems like every second post of yours is about Obamacare. I just find it amusing that your reaction is to claim that this is a leftist conspiracy to sell Obama.   

You're obviously very entrenched in your position

 

Likewise.  And, no, you can't convince me that there exists no authoritarian left in this country.  Complete horseshit from somebody that either doesn't want to be seen as authoritarian, or doesn't want the trainwreck caused by the left in this country to be attributed to his ideology.  Or both.

 

I've seen the authoritarian left in action.  I've seen it shut businesses down.  I've seen it brainlessly upend the healthcare system.  I've seen it get a major CEO fired for failure-to-conform.  I've seen it ban.  I've seen it mandate.  I've seen it ostracize.  I've seen it audit political enemies.  I've seen it tax.  I've seen it spend.  I've seen it all.  The American authoritarian left is as thriving as it has ever been.

 

Everybody has an agenda.  That's not a conspiracy theory.  Its a fact.  Why would the creators of this questionnaire and voter guide be any different?


It is concerning how many conservatives on this site gave credence to it without question.  I'm sure many more did last election cycle.

 

JB

I haven't been following the thread, but I can address this question.  Is it reasonable to imagine that those on the left would want to sell Obama?  Would people on the left be more likely to want to sell Obama, or those on the right? 

If they did -- or if they wanted to sell some view further left than his -- would it work better to portray him as on the left, or as on the right but closer to the center than his opponents?

The answers are obvious, aren't they?  Whether we refer to people speaking as "conspiracy" or simply as speech.

It's like claiming there is no real difference between red and blue, when compared to gamma rays or long radio waves. It's true, but purposely deceptive.

This graphic came to mind, immediately, upon viewing their political spectrum graph.

I never said there was "no real difference." Just that on a global political spectrum, this is accurate - our liberals are far right of most european liberal politicians. That's hardly equivalent to utilizing the entire electromagnetic spectrum to minimize differences, except as an extreme distortion of its own.

That's not the global political spectrum.  There is simply no way that Virgil Goode -- an American Constitutional conservative, not a Saudi cleric -- is the pinnacle of global right-wing authoritarianism.  Even as a global representation ... its a major distortion.

 

A distortion that intentionally places American conservatives at the extreme edge.  Virgil Goode is not more extreme than Bashar Al Assad.  Than Hu Jintao (the right-wing Chinese communist, apparently).  They've got Virgil Goode -- an American Conservative -- as equivalently authoritarian to Robert Mugabe.  I don't know a ton about Goode ... but I'm damn sure he's not Robert Mugabe.

 

This grid is a joke.

 


JB

A fair point. I still maintain that Obama is pretty right of European liberals, enough to where he could be considered a conservative without deliberate misrepresentation. 

Just for shits and giggles what definition of conservative are you using?

For giggles, for this conversation - The way a French or British parliamentarian might be defined. David Cameron, for instance. Some elements of Fiscal responsiblity (as well as moderate tax breaks - from 50% down to 45%), but still spending on socialized healthcare, education (including subsidized university) and other infrastructure. 

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Braeden 2.0's discussion The Horror of Day to Day Life
"I was a subsistence hunter for most of my adult life. I highly recommend putting yourself at the top of the food chain. Even if you're a vegetarian. You should know the work that goes into keeping you alive for a year."
4 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Braeden 2.0's discussion The Horror of Day to Day Life
"I don't see how any Judeo-Christian or Darwinist could feel uncomfortable with eating meat. For each it's just a natural part of the ecosystem."
5 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to Braeden 2.0's discussion The Horror of Day to Day Life
"Maybe it's just me ... but describing carnivorism as "eating flesh cut from corpses of conquered lower life-forms" still wouldn't strike me as at all horrific.  Just the reality of life.  Some life -- maybe even most --…"
5 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Braeden 2.0's discussion The Horror of Day to Day Life
"Y'all are pussies. You're supposed to grow out of that kind of squeamishness before puberty. And here I thought I'd found a thread on the horror of mundanity."
5 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Lumberjoe's discussion Some People Dislike The New LGBTQ(etc.) Pride Flag Because Racism in the group The Great Debate
"I generally divide political factions into four groups, simply because most people fall into one of these four groups whether they think they do or not. First and second are low-itelligence left and right. Both are vulgar followers who think…"
6 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Cody "Rooster" McDonnell's discussion Sailing Crew Needed
"If I were naive and carefree I'd pack my bag right now. Sounds like a blast. Godspeed."
7 hours ago
Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"@Jay What makes you think I'm going to go point by point to debunk your bullshit when you don't actually care? BTW, just glancing at it, the third on the list is bullshit too. @Dom He didn't say yes. He said, "ummm. I guess…"
10 hours ago
Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"Oh shit never mind. Guess I've been busier than I thought."
10 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service