So it is looking like there is a very good chance that the Congress might pass a bill here soon that will require all online businesses to collect/pay state taxes for our online purchases.

Saw one tidbit where they are going to try to exclude the small retailers(less than $1mm). Looking like the WalMarts and the Amazons are all for it, while EBay is against.

What do you guys think?
Is it just another tax or is it leveling the playing field on taxes that should have been paid in the first place?

Me, I'm all for it for refilling the emptying accounts at the state/local levels where it is needed more than anywhere else.

Views: 99

Replies to This Discussion

I don't think it's bad in theory, but practice gets sticky. 

Who gets the revenue, the state where the purchaser is? the state where the seller is? The state where the facilitation website is? What about international sales? Whose tax rate to use - will this cause a mass flood of online business relocations to New Hampshire? (in the case of ebay, where private sales - e.g. garage sales would have done - who is taxed?) What is the method for wholesale/resale exemption (or is there).

What is the implementation method? The enforcement method? 

Lots of questions and complications that make this a very messy piece to just throw out there, and lots of unintended consequences, I think. 

That doesn't make it wrong to do, but it's going to be a long time before this really gets sussed out. 

Just another tax.  Just more government greed.  Liberals are always "all for refilling" government coffers at any opportunity.  Never met a tax they didn't like ... nickel-and-diming everybody to death to squeeze every last penny out of every business or consumer they possibly can.

 

And, if they get this tax passed ... they'll move on to the next brilliant idea for new taxes.  Rain tax.  Carbon tax.  Blah, blah.  One answer to every problem.

 

JB

A slippery slope type argument I want to lay out(that will probably derail) but where exactly do online "things" happen? How do we prosecute an infraction that happens online? Whose laws do we use? Is it considered federal? State? Global?

I am sure that there are probably some brilliant papers written on the subject, but this is honestly the first I've really let myself think on it.

If I am in Texas and I harass someone in Maine, do we use Texas laws, Maine laws or Federal laws?

So with taxes, if I am in Texas and I purchase a good here in Texas I pay taxes. But when I purchase online, where exactly am I purchasing it from?

The current tax laws have you pay tax, in the state in which you bought it, if the retailer has a physical presence there.

 

The classic example is Sears.  If you bought something from a Sears catalog, and mailed them the check, you paid sales tax if you lived in a state containing a Sears.  And *only* if Sears was present in your state.

 

By the same logic, Texans will now have to pay sales tax for Amazon purchases, since they put a physical location (shipping warehouse) in the DFW area.

 

The point is this.  Despite the change in the technology, the basic structure of "mail order" has not changed.  This bill should be dead on arrival, but unfortunately most of our legislators are seeing dollar signs, and are too stupid to realize that what they're doing is both unwanted and wrong.

US congress passing a law requiring State taxes?  Who's lobbying for that one?

The last article I read, it was the big retailers

And also State governors are lobbying, it appears... well, that does make sense.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/25/internet-sales-tax-bill-...

Write up on it if anyone is interested, got it from Fox News for anyone who complains about my posting HP

Now you'll get fussed at for citing Fox.  cest la vie.

California's online sales tax works this way.  It's all on the consumer.  If the seller doesn't have a "physical presence" in California, you're supposed to declare a "use tax" for your out of state purchases on your state income tax return.  The use tax at the same rate as the state sales tax.  This works, at least for now, on the honor system...which leads to a number of cars in Northern California initially having Oregon tags.

It passed the Senate, now time to see what the House does

RSS

Latest Activity

Mongoose replied to certified male's discussion Walking around the house naked
"Huh?!?  That needs to be modified: There is NOTHING that gives ANYONE a right to sass their spouse or children. There is NOTHING that gives ANYONE a right to disrespect any human."
9 minutes ago
Mongoose replied to certified male's discussion Walking around the house naked
"Blech. Remind me not to sit on your sofa. That makes me stress about what people sit on naked in hotel rooms before I arrive! :-)"
10 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to certified male's discussion Walking around the house naked
"Sounds like you need to hit the gym"
1 hour ago
Paul MacAlindin replied to Joshua Hudson's discussion 5 Quick Tips To Accomplish Any Goal You Set
"Got a great idea guys. Why don't each of us do a short video on the 5 most important tips for whatever we like in 5 minutes, and post it here for everybody to look at, criticise or ignore as they please?"
1 hour ago
Mike S. replied to Joshua Hudson's discussion 5 Quick Tips To Accomplish Any Goal You Set
"So I am kind of annoyed that I clicked his video to verify what Denny said about his other videos. Can we just delete this thread please so no one else gives this turd unearned traffic? "
3 hours ago
Joe Guilfoyle replied to certified male's discussion Walking around the house naked
"Nudity within your home or on your property considering degrees of privacy is not a matter of normalcy.  It's a matter of being able to be in your own skin at home. The one place a man can be the king of his castle.  Perhaps your wife…"
5 hours ago
Paul MacAlindin added a discussion to the group Out to Build Bridges
Thumbnail

Men touching men

Interesting theme, hugging. Here's that story about two hetero American high school students who were told to either hold hands for an hour publicly, or be suspended for fighting:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/30/westwood-high-school-hold-hands-punishment_n_2218698.htmlWas this a powerful punishment? Yes. One boy was so teased and humiliated he said he wouldn't…See More
5 hours ago
Paul MacAlindin joined Ian Wilson's group
Thumbnail

Out to Build Bridges

This is a LGBTQ+ group.  All men are encouraged to join, including straight men.However, unlike the already established AoM group "Gay and Bisexual Men", this group is wide open, no privacy settings enabled.  The overall purpose of the group is to encourage conversations between the straight and non-straight communities.  This already happens in AoM, but it is scattered.  And it can't happen in the private "Gay and Bisexual Men" group.Debate is expected, but this is for building up bridges not…See More
6 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service