So it is looking like there is a very good chance that the Congress might pass a bill here soon that will require all online businesses to collect/pay state taxes for our online purchases.

Saw one tidbit where they are going to try to exclude the small retailers(less than $1mm). Looking like the WalMarts and the Amazons are all for it, while EBay is against.

What do you guys think?
Is it just another tax or is it leveling the playing field on taxes that should have been paid in the first place?

Me, I'm all for it for refilling the emptying accounts at the state/local levels where it is needed more than anywhere else.

Views: 99

Replies to This Discussion

I don't think it's bad in theory, but practice gets sticky. 

Who gets the revenue, the state where the purchaser is? the state where the seller is? The state where the facilitation website is? What about international sales? Whose tax rate to use - will this cause a mass flood of online business relocations to New Hampshire? (in the case of ebay, where private sales - e.g. garage sales would have done - who is taxed?) What is the method for wholesale/resale exemption (or is there).

What is the implementation method? The enforcement method? 

Lots of questions and complications that make this a very messy piece to just throw out there, and lots of unintended consequences, I think. 

That doesn't make it wrong to do, but it's going to be a long time before this really gets sussed out. 

Just another tax.  Just more government greed.  Liberals are always "all for refilling" government coffers at any opportunity.  Never met a tax they didn't like ... nickel-and-diming everybody to death to squeeze every last penny out of every business or consumer they possibly can.

 

And, if they get this tax passed ... they'll move on to the next brilliant idea for new taxes.  Rain tax.  Carbon tax.  Blah, blah.  One answer to every problem.

 

JB

A slippery slope type argument I want to lay out(that will probably derail) but where exactly do online "things" happen? How do we prosecute an infraction that happens online? Whose laws do we use? Is it considered federal? State? Global?

I am sure that there are probably some brilliant papers written on the subject, but this is honestly the first I've really let myself think on it.

If I am in Texas and I harass someone in Maine, do we use Texas laws, Maine laws or Federal laws?

So with taxes, if I am in Texas and I purchase a good here in Texas I pay taxes. But when I purchase online, where exactly am I purchasing it from?

The current tax laws have you pay tax, in the state in which you bought it, if the retailer has a physical presence there.

 

The classic example is Sears.  If you bought something from a Sears catalog, and mailed them the check, you paid sales tax if you lived in a state containing a Sears.  And *only* if Sears was present in your state.

 

By the same logic, Texans will now have to pay sales tax for Amazon purchases, since they put a physical location (shipping warehouse) in the DFW area.

 

The point is this.  Despite the change in the technology, the basic structure of "mail order" has not changed.  This bill should be dead on arrival, but unfortunately most of our legislators are seeing dollar signs, and are too stupid to realize that what they're doing is both unwanted and wrong.

US congress passing a law requiring State taxes?  Who's lobbying for that one?

The last article I read, it was the big retailers

And also State governors are lobbying, it appears... well, that does make sense.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/25/internet-sales-tax-bill-...

Write up on it if anyone is interested, got it from Fox News for anyone who complains about my posting HP

Now you'll get fussed at for citing Fox.  cest la vie.

California's online sales tax works this way.  It's all on the consumer.  If the seller doesn't have a "physical presence" in California, you're supposed to declare a "use tax" for your out of state purchases on your state income tax return.  The use tax at the same rate as the state sales tax.  This works, at least for now, on the honor system...which leads to a number of cars in Northern California initially having Oregon tags.

It passed the Senate, now time to see what the House does

RSS

Latest Activity

Steve Dallas replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
"Foolproof - Have fun and let her have fun. Bond. Throw out the rules/methods. Let your bodies and your hearts decide what to do. Dump the business handshake."
1 hour ago
Mongoose replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
"First, you need to know that dating is NOT about "winning" the other person. It's not about you doing what you can to "get" the other person. It's not about trying to get them to date you. It's CERTAINLY not about…"
1 hour ago
Henrik Stroemblad posted a discussion

Vintage Suits

I just figured we needed a thread to discuss how awesome vintage suits are.I just got lucky the other day and ordered a vintage 1950's suit from Hallaballoo... I mean Ballyhoo. It fits me perfectly, as if it was tailored for me. I plan to get the sleeves slightly adjusted when I have time to take it to a tailor, but other than that it fits perfectly. I plan to wear it with a black fedora that I have, and obviously with a dress shirt and a tie.…See More
2 hours ago
R. Max commented on Jack Bauer's status
12 hours ago
Jack Bauer posted a status
"Good grief; it was a kangaroo with a beach ball, not an insurrection. I was making fun of taking seriously such a toothless thread topic."
13 hours ago
Johnzerd1 replied to Braeden P.D.'s discussion Post-Mortem Symposium
"This reminds me of the old Steve Allen series  Meeting of minds .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6XPCgL8X28"
13 hours ago
Hesse posted a discussion

First date: success not optional but mandatory

I have a date tomorrow night with a girl I met online. While this may sound like great news and the answer to lifelong joy, I want to make sure that this leads to a second date, and that I don't make a "death move" to end all chances of seeing her again. This is the early cultivation phase of a relationship, the kind of relationship I have been praying for , that leads to romantic love, marriage and procreation.  All of my experience with the few dating I have has been unsuccessfulSo, at this…See More
14 hours ago
Sir replied to Henrik Stroemblad's discussion Lacking in the most basic of common cortesy
"I couldn't have.Thread locked."
15 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service