As the ban on 16 ounce beverages begins to shape up in New York City, the "Health" panel is already discussing moving on to bigger and better things. Two fresh new ideas are bans on popcorn and milk sizes. Here's the article for reference. I left the comment: "Once the camel's head is in the tent, prepare to sleep with it." What say you?
Tags: 16 ounce, Bloomberg, New York, beverages, big goverment, regulations, socialism
Permalink Reply by Titus Techera on June 15, 2012 at 11:41am I think Mr. Bloomberg himself mentioned you could just buy two... I just hope this kind of mock-politics puts whatever decorative nails are needed so America can again retire the coffin of 'no-labels, post-partisan' politics.
Permalink Reply by JonEdanger on June 14, 2012 at 5:25am Then the Sargent said to President Clinton "Well, Mr. President, we usually just ride the camel in to town where the women are..."
Permalink Reply by Herb Munson on June 14, 2012 at 9:55am Yeah, good luck gettin between those guys and their "big gulps!"
Permalink Reply by Rick Shelton on June 14, 2012 at 2:44pm Typical New York Democratic kind of mentality. "You all are too stupid to think for yourselves so we'll take over that for you. Oh, and by the way the Public Sing-Along is at 3:00pm sharp, be there or we'll write you up."
Permalink Reply by Mike Wisbrock on June 14, 2012 at 2:59pm Attica! Attica!
Permalink Reply by Herb Munson on June 14, 2012 at 11:29pm They don't see any problems with freedom. When you're in the cat-bird seat, you're free to do as you please. Right Mr. P?
Permalink Reply by Rick Shelton on June 15, 2012 at 10:02am Yep, no problem with freedom as long as they got it and you don't.
Permalink Reply by Paul_of_TX on June 15, 2012 at 10:09am I'm sure if you just give them the opportunity to control our freedom they will dole it out to us in tiny little pieces. They don't want to take away our freedoms. They just want full control over our freedom, have the ability to threaten to take it away and dish it out to us in miniscule little pieces.
Permalink Reply by Chuck Knight on June 15, 2012 at 10:24am And only when it suits their purposes, according to the fleeting whims of the moment.
Permalink Reply by Rick Shelton on June 15, 2012 at 10:46am You gotta ask yourself "What would the Founding Fathers think about this?". Talk about Tyranny over the Masses.
Is this Constitutional? I can't see how it could be, can someone enlighten me?
Doesn't this directly affect Interstate Commerce (sales of cups, straws, syrup, corn, oil, etc.)? Didn't the Whitehouse use some such argument in favor of the Obamacare plan?
Permalink Reply by Chuck Knight on June 15, 2012 at 11:44am Nah, those bigoted white slaveholders who were out of touch with the modern world...wouldn't understand the need for the government to control soda pop.
On a more serious note, it's not Constitutional, if it was done by the Federal government.
State governments and local governments have a lot more power than they usually use...so it *may* stand up to scrutiny, since it's a local law.
One argument about the health care debacle is that it's unconstitutional if done federally, but each state could mandate it, as Taxachussetts already has.
Nathan DeParis replied to Nathan DeParis's discussion Women: The Infallible Baromoter
Liam replied to Steve's discussion Hair styles for men with fine hair
Richard replied to Matthew L Weiss's discussion How do you reel her in?
Steve replied to Steve's discussion Hair styles for men with fine hair
Liam replied to Steve's discussion Hair styles for men with fine hair
Paul_of_TX replied to Steve's discussion Why do people hate freemasons?
© 2013 Created by Brett McKay.
Powered by