Overall, the general theme of "populism" whether or not it comes from Republican or Democratic talking points, is one of pitting "the people" or "the masses" against some hypothetical "elites".

Overall, beyond merely being used as a tool by politicians to manipulate naive people's emotions, I can't think of much good about populism, my rationale:

1. Populism is associated with anarchy, mob rule, and totalitarianism, rather than any actual effective Democratic society - It has more in common with the rhetoric used in the French Revolution than the American Revolution; likewise both fascist and Soviet regimes employed populist rhetoric to manipulate "the masses".

2. Populism on the whole is associated with low manners, morals, and character - basically it's a reversal of the natural order of things, as it attempts to "glorify" the mediocre, less creative, less moral individuals of society while at the same time demonizing the more creative, successful, and virtuous as "elites". This seems to be true regardless of what specific incarnation it takes - whether racial or sexual identity politics, the antics of the Occupy Wall Street movement, or the demonetization of higher and more creative professions such as arts, music, theology, in favor of simpler and more utilitarian ones which better service the material interests of the state or regime, as we see in many authoritarian states such as the Soviet Union and North Korea.

In reality I see 'populism' the way it's employed as having very little in common with America's Founders, or with Greek democratic systems which America's government was inspired by - essentially the Founders were meritocratic; they believed every man had the potential to be great, and should be judged on his own character and worth rather than his position of birth.

However, they didn't blindly idolize the "masses" or "common man" like the anarchist and radicals of the French Revolution did, or as in the rhetoric which the Soviets and Maoists employed.

The type of "common man" the Founders admired was a virtuous, self-made man, while at the same time the Founders were quite distrustful of the "masses" as well as direct democracy, as they feared it would lead to mob rule, and didn't believe that mobs were fit to self-govern.

I believe part if this is that they were wise to understand that any man with no higher sense of purpose or value in life but his mere materialistic needs could every truly be 'free' to begin with, or anything other than a slave, since he lives every day as a slave to his own materialistic vices. Likewise in the Athenian Democracy, only those who demonstrated some basic meritorious requirements were allowed to be citizens or participate in government.

---

So on the whole, it's hard for me too see much good in "populism" as a political ideology, and I see it more as a tool by con men used to prey on the emotions of the masses, and recruit mediocre individuals without a strong sense of self-identity into their "movements".

Views: 47

Replies to This Discussion

The term and its definition you are using come from an earlier time when - as you say- "The type of "common man" the Founders admired was a virtuous, self-made man".   The problem we face today is that our form of government does not consider these attributes when selecting leaders.

Consider the reality that our government is controlled by special interest. (and I would welcome anyone who could argue it is not the reality)  Special interest groups and the lobbyist that influence our legislators are bought and paid for with big money, something our unorganized populist can not compete against with petitions and letter writing and phone calls.

It is only through a raising up of 'Populism' that the common man's interests (and common sense) can be brought to bear and overcome these special interests, which are most often focused on profits over people, profits over the environment and profits over our collective future.

I would argue that the US has always been controlled by special interests. 
From many of the sponsors of the revolutionaries having strong ties to illicit trade, to the vote only going to land owning males and the compromises made to the slave states and so forth and so on.

Populism:

support for the concerns of ordinary people.

the quality of appealing to or being aimed at ordinary people

Like most other things, its application in any given situation can be good or bad. But support for the concerns of ordinary people is not inherently bad.

I am become memes, the destroyer of sam.

It's just like him to leave before I can show him the fruits of my labor.

RSS

Latest Activity

Jay D replied to Portnoy's discussion Integrity
"It is not about deadlines it is about the question how we treat a person and the capitalistic logic expects us to treat them based on what their value for the company is and to increase the value they generate for said company. The big problem with…"
4 hours ago
derick bean posted a status
5 hours ago
Naveen posted a discussion

I am searching the AOM Article about William James / Fake it till you make it

Hi,There is a terrific article about William James Psychology and his concept about "Fake it till you make it". Act as if you already are confident. I cant find on google, here nowwhere. Anybody has read it lately?Best regards,NaveenSee More
5 hours ago
Gentleman Engineer replied to Gentleman Engineer's discussion Barcelona About October
"Pleasure would state that said tense would lack aught of the prototypical. Fortune would state also that there would exist a certain settlement about the State of the Sole Star which would exist apropos for such an adjective."
9 hours ago
Braeden 2.0 replied to Gentleman Engineer's discussion Barcelona About October
"I'm very good at impersonating other people's writing or speaking."
9 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Gentleman Engineer's discussion Barcelona About October
"The fact that you do that so well makes me lose a little respect for you."
12 hours ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion Latest in Health Care in the group The Great Debate
"Subtitle 2 Section 7,9-10,15-18. The non-taxed inheritance bit will come in a later bill.  That falls into either tax reform, or Phase 3 of Ryan's plan."
14 hours ago
Native Son replied to Specs's discussion I need some work advice.
""He's Back!""
14 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service