A couple days ago, a gun channel was taken off youtube. Youtube shortly restores it and says it was taken down because it was thought to have violated the Google+ TOS, but it turned out to be nothing. Several other youtubers and fans expressed their concern, considering the highly suspicious timing and Google's already widely known stance. Tonight it was taken down again. Is this pure stupidity, or flagrant censorship?

https://mobile.twitter.com/hickok45

Views: 1693

Replies to This Discussion

"What really pisses me off about it is that this is motivated by the desire to censor different views."

I'm not sure that's demonstrated. This move is purely commercial. YT gets to pocket that revenue for the vast majority of users now.

I guess you could consider LBTQ stuff being moved to restricted as censorship.

From the article:

Last month, a number of companies, including Johnson & Johnson and General Motors Co., said they were suspending their advertising on YouTube after an investigation by Britain’s the Times showed how ads appeared alongside videos that promote hate and extremism.

And if that didn't demonstrate it enough, YouTube has a history of silencing those with viewpoints they don't like. This very thread demonstrates that.

The motivation is still following the money. Not censoring views. They are not taking down those videos, just limiting the options to monetize them, on their privately owned platform, unless they play by their rules. 

YT is not a public utility, or government entity. They are well within their rights to define the terms under which you get to use them. And none of that is censoring.

The motivation is still following the money. Not censoring views. They are not taking down those videos, just limiting the options to monetize them, on their privately owned platform, unless they play by their rules. 

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/coercion

YT is not a public utility, or government entity. They are well within their rights to define the terms under which you get to use them. And none of that is censoring.

What is wrong with you people?? Enough with this ridiculous statist straw man! God!

Then enough with the ridiculous equivocation about what censorship is. YT is doing no such thing. 

I didn't call this censorship. I said it was motivated by it. 

"Is this pure stupidity, or flagrant censorship?"

Sorry, I didn't know the goalposts had moved.

Hasn't moved. You have simply asserted without demonstrating that is the case, either historically or now. 

No, we were obviously talking about youtube limiting monetization options. Then you bring in something I said about Hickok's troubles. Nowhere have I said the monetization limitations are censorship.

Silly me for assuming replies in a discussion thread related to the OP. 

RSS

Latest Activity

Pale Horse replied to Gentleman Engineer's discussion Barcelona About October
"The fact that you do that so well makes me lose a little respect for you."
2 hours ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion Latest in Health Care in the group The Great Debate
"Subtitle 2 Section 7,9-10,15-18. The non-taxed inheritance bit will come in a later bill.  That falls into either tax reform, or Phase 3 of Ryan's plan."
4 hours ago
Native Son replied to Specs's discussion I need some work advice.
""He's Back!""
4 hours ago
Native Son replied to Portnoy's discussion Latest in Health Care in the group The Great Debate
"Missed that part.  Where is it in the House bill?  "
4 hours ago
Papa Thompson Jr joined Bryan Smith's group
Thumbnail

Gentlemen Apologists

A place for gentlemen of all stripes who are interested in the broad field of Christian apologetics. If you are a thoughtful man interested in pursuing a more reasonable faith, or if becoming a pipe-smoking clone of C.S. Lewis is one of your greatest aspirations, then this is the place for you.See More
9 hours ago
Shane joined Steven C.'s group
Thumbnail

Exercise

Exercise is a crucial part of maintaining a manly physique. Join up to share ideas, get support and discuss plans with other men.See More
11 hours ago
Braeden 2.0 replied to Gentleman Engineer's discussion Barcelona About October
"It would appear that one's speech patterns bear extensive marks of pretense, sir gentleman. Perhaps it may bamboozle the denizens of that Iberian burgh to speak in such a fashion ostentatious?"
11 hours ago
Gentleman Engineer posted a discussion

Barcelona About October

It would appear that one shall pay visit to Barcelona about October for a conference. Would aught exist able to proffer opine as to attractions about said settlement, or advice as to a sojourn thereof?See More
yesterday

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service