There's a WH petition to lift the ban on automatic firearms. Here's the link:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/repeal-1986-full-auto-ban...

Views: 609

Replies to This Discussion

"I understand reasonable restrictions. But automatic weapons restrictions are a step toward tyranny."

You do understand that there is a long list of countrys who are further away from tyranny then the USA who dont even allow hand guns to most citizens?

Such as?

Australia?  England?

Just the first two that popped into my head..

Every country that is rated as a proper democracy. USA comes out on place 21.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index

It's where we draw the line on what is contained under "for the most part" that we disagree. 

Having spent about 14 years of my military career operating in small teams; I can say the only time I ever used fully automatic fire was during break-contact drills or when setting up support-by-fire positions to support ambushes/raids. That said, I have no objection to any law abiding citizen from owning a full auto weapon if they want.

As for if a full auto weapon is an effective tool against tyrany using 200lbs bombs.......I guess we can ask the Viet Cong.
Eh. Even if you're not inclined to spray-and-pray -- which probably doesn't work all that well -- you'd still need full-auto capability to do burst-fire, which strikes me as a much more effective setting than either full- or semi-auto. So, it makes some sense.

Good point about the Viet Cong. Guerrilla warfare with small-arms can be very effective, even against a better armed force.

JB

Volume of fire is a potent variable in a firefight. For supressing fire, machine gunners are generally trained to fire in 20-round bursts - if only to delay the need to change barrels. 

Generally (hopefully) the days of large-scale infantry engagements are over. Gone are the days of companies of riflemen "holding a line". In that environment, burst-fire replaced full-auto to prevent nervous riflemen from running through all their ammo.

In this era of small-unit tactics, presence patrols, raids and ambushes, etc. volume of fire is king at close ranges.

I think Afghanistan is kinda different - crazy long range engagements. But I dunno - never been there.

What do you guys think how that scenario would play out?

Some militia fighting against the biggest military on earth? Can you shoot down tanks and drones with a assault rifle?

Burst fire definitely has a place in a fire fight.

Thanks. I spent most of my career in an unconventional warfare environment. The VC are only one of several instances of insurgents fighting and winning against larger, better armed forces.

>Implying the potbellied miltia dweebs carrying "Don't tread on me" flags across the Midwest are on the same level as the Viet Cong or IRA.

LOL

RSS

Latest Activity

jazzgirl205 replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"Ameretta, what do you do that brings you joy and gets you around people?  Forget about men right now.  Concentrate on being with all kinds of people doing interesting things.  I'm not making light of your predicament, trust me on…"
26 minutes ago
R. Max 2.0 replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"hmmm, from at least my perspective, no one said anything was easy. You could call it oversimplifying, and you'd be right. Like I said, this is out of my depth, but it seems similar to the phrase "love yourself" in general. Everyone…"
1 hour ago
Ameretta replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"I wanted to  be straightforward with the title, but this is how I truly feel, and I think that the person you mentioned is oversimplifying the problem because how would you feel if you were told you were the highest rate of…"
1 hour ago
Ameretta replied to Ameretta's discussion Should I kill Myself Because I am a black woman?
"Then don't invest your time in replying to my question because you're doing yourself more of an inconvenience than you are torwards me. "
1 hour ago
Tim replied to Tim's discussion Are You the Initiator or the Follower? in the group The Shirtless Man
"I was the initiator earlier this week at the gym. It was late and I was the only person there for quite a while so after some warm up sets the shirt came off. Later on a guy comes in, we exchanged greetings and then continued with our work outs. He…"
2 hours ago
John Muir replied to Nick H's discussion Has AOM jumped the shark or is it's just cyclical in the group The Great Debate
"maybe that's cuz you've had him blocked. He's an educated armed forces veteran. And a homo :)"
2 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Nick H's discussion Has AOM jumped the shark or is it's just cyclical in the group The Great Debate
"Meanwhile, you're an "intense purveyor" of ad hominem, white knight-ing, condescension, CNN conspiracy theories and virtue signaling. I don't remember the last time you actually contributed anything worthwhile to a thread. You…"
3 hours ago
Eddy Kirdland replied to Arjan's discussion Shirtless Around Women in the group The Shirtless Man
"If her husband is sometimes shirtless, too, it's probably okay if you are, but, if you want to be sure, continue to put a shirt on when she comes around until and unless she or her husband tells you not to worry about it. "
3 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service