There's a WH petition to lift the ban on automatic firearms. Here's the link:

Views: 630

Replies to This Discussion

"I understand reasonable restrictions. But automatic weapons restrictions are a step toward tyranny."

You do understand that there is a long list of countrys who are further away from tyranny then the USA who dont even allow hand guns to most citizens?

Such as?

Australia?  England?

Just the first two that popped into my head..

Every country that is rated as a proper democracy. USA comes out on place 21.

It's where we draw the line on what is contained under "for the most part" that we disagree. 

Having spent about 14 years of my military career operating in small teams; I can say the only time I ever used fully automatic fire was during break-contact drills or when setting up support-by-fire positions to support ambushes/raids. That said, I have no objection to any law abiding citizen from owning a full auto weapon if they want.

As for if a full auto weapon is an effective tool against tyrany using 200lbs bombs.......I guess we can ask the Viet Cong.
Eh. Even if you're not inclined to spray-and-pray -- which probably doesn't work all that well -- you'd still need full-auto capability to do burst-fire, which strikes me as a much more effective setting than either full- or semi-auto. So, it makes some sense.

Good point about the Viet Cong. Guerrilla warfare with small-arms can be very effective, even against a better armed force.


Volume of fire is a potent variable in a firefight. For supressing fire, machine gunners are generally trained to fire in 20-round bursts - if only to delay the need to change barrels. 

Generally (hopefully) the days of large-scale infantry engagements are over. Gone are the days of companies of riflemen "holding a line". In that environment, burst-fire replaced full-auto to prevent nervous riflemen from running through all their ammo.

In this era of small-unit tactics, presence patrols, raids and ambushes, etc. volume of fire is king at close ranges.

I think Afghanistan is kinda different - crazy long range engagements. But I dunno - never been there.

What do you guys think how that scenario would play out?

Some militia fighting against the biggest military on earth? Can you shoot down tanks and drones with a assault rifle?

Burst fire definitely has a place in a fire fight.

Thanks. I spent most of my career in an unconventional warfare environment. The VC are only one of several instances of insurgents fighting and winning against larger, better armed forces.

>Implying the potbellied miltia dweebs carrying "Don't tread on me" flags across the Midwest are on the same level as the Viet Cong or IRA.



Latest Activity

Lionheart commented on Stephen Larsen's group Banya Men!
"Hoping to hit the sauna next week in Dallas. Could use a relaxing spa day. Anyone care to join an AoM brother there?"
49 minutes ago
David R. commented on Shane Belin's group Pennsylvania
"Comment by David R. 1 second ago Delete Comment I'm looking for a quality 4"x6" desk size Pa. flag.  I ordered one from an online company but when it arrived, you simply could not see the coat of arms because it is printed so…"
3 hours ago
Nature of a Man replied to Nature of a Man's discussion A bizarre dating trend I see
"For example, it wasn't so long ago that the well-off married essentially for political and business reasons. Their partners were spouses for the purposes of appearances and to produce offspring but the partners led very separate lives, often…"
5 hours ago
Kit the Odd replied to Xenias Latin's discussion New Leadership Question
"I agree that this sounds more like a management issue than a leadership issue.  I don't really have any good suggestions for management training books. As for leadership, look up the US Army leadership manuals.  ADP 6-22 and ADRP…"
7 hours ago
David R. added a discussion to the group Comedy!

I know, I know...

I know, I know, I've got a dirty mind sometimes.  But here goes anyway.I passed by the sign in front of a local gym that was promoting how much weight their members had lost.  I saw "Congratulations, Bob Smith!  He lost 75 pounds and 19 inches!"How many men would like to lose "19 inches"?!  Comments?See More
9 hours ago
Jay D replied to J. Exalto's discussion Globalism in the group The Great Debate
"We are discussing two things here. 1. Globalism actually brought as huge relative wealth since the average western household now can afford things that were liited to the aristocracy just 100 years ago. Have you laundry done, babysitters, maids,…"
9 hours ago
Jay D replied to J. Exalto's discussion Globalism in the group The Great Debate
"I agree and being able to patent f.e. new drug recipes is very important for innovation, since there is a lot of money invested. But there are also many areas were patents kill innovation and competition, since they grant a quasi monopoly for…"
10 hours ago
Dal updated their profile
10 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service