Captain comb-over's ignorant statements about illegal immigrants were followed by a surge in his popularity amongst republicans, according to CNN polls.

     He tried to defend his characterization of Mexicans as rapists and drug dealers by citing some statistic that indicated 80% of central american migrants were raped as they passed through Mexico on their way to enter the US illegally.


     That sounds like it might be true - I know that rape is such a threat that central american women often pay for birth control shots before they cross into Mexico in anticipation of the threat... but where he proves his complete ignorance is in his using this fact to validate his assertion that the refugees are rapists - they're rape victims, not rapists. And it's very telling that they're willing to take that risk. What does that say about the conditions they are fleeing?


Views: 10121

Replies to This Discussion

If you can look past the narrative for a moment, it should be obvious: if you hate all Muslims and want them banned from the country, you don't negotiate a release so you can bring one back. Because bringing Muslims in is the _opposite_ of keeping them out.

This doesn't show Trump doesn't totally suck; it just shows he doesn't hate all Muslims and want them banned from the country.  He'll have to totally suck without hating all Muslims and wanting them banned from the country.  That narrative has failed.

Here are the overwhelming accolades I was able to find, looking at front pages above the fold:

PJMedia doesn't have an above-the-fold per se, but "Egypt" doesn't show up on its page 1.

Breitbart doesn't either.  It does have "Egypt" on page 1:  MORBIDLY OBESE EGYPTIAN WOMAN SHEDS HALF HER WEIGHT

So maybe it's MSM that's giving the overwhelming accolades.

Above-the-fold references to it on

CNN: 0
NYT: 0
ABC: 0

NYT, WSJ, and Fox have stories lower down on page 1.  

Looks like the "overwhelming accolades" narrative failed too.  We can keep it if we need it.

If you look past the narrative you're creating, one instance of helping someone who probably is Muslim does not undo months of rhetoric of stoking hatred against Muslims, both American and foreign.

Trump is the man who makes patently and easily-disproved statements like Muslims were celebrating in the streets of New Jersey on 9/11. Trump is the man that used Islam as a way to disqualify the sacrifice of an American family whose son died in combat. Trump! The same man who couldn't weather a heel spur to kill a commie for mommy and thinks that a couple years at a third rate (and now nearly defunct) military academy makes him more qualified than military professionals with decades of experience, whom he'll blame anyway for any mistakes if something goes wrong.

American Muslims have faced high levels of discrimination since his nomination and election. Ask Muslims how they feel about the administration and let us see if this one act of minor competence makes a difference. After all, he merely got an American citizen released from a regime towards which he is friendly. It's not exactly the most advanced piece of diplomacy ever executed.

I don't see what the story has to do with the "Muslim ban".

She's a US Citizen, right?

His Creepy, Ignorant, Jerky ban has always excluded citizens even when he was campaigning.

Is she a muslim?

OK gentlemen, let's discuss President Trump's record vis-a-vis his much bally hooed "Contract with the American Voter."

During the campaign Trump put EVERYTHING below in writing.  On October 22, 2016, he published the contract.

So far, he's not going to make his contracted completion date.  He's also accomplished nothing in the contract that requires working with Congress.

"Draining the Swamp."  Very first item hasn't been done, or apparently even started.

The last item hasn't been done.  The other four have been done by Executive Order, and the biggest one affecting the American Voter is the Federal Hiring Freeze.

"Protect The American Worker."  We're still in NAFTA.  We're out of the unratified PTT (but the Chinese are all-in on their version). Energy Reserves Exploitation is stuck in a 1917-era coal economy mode.  China is not a currency manipulator.  Commerce hasn't been directed to identify "trade abuses." USG work involving Climate Change cancelled, but the money budgeted for the cancelled programs hasn't gone to infrastructure work.  Petroleum pipeline completion in the Plains States has been facilitated and fast tracked.

"Restore Security"  Apparently there weren't all that many "unconstitutional" Executive Orders signed by President Obama.  Begin replacing Justice Scalia; Actually Done and Completed. Cancel federal funding to sanctuary cities; Not Done, requires Congress act. "Remove criminal aliens" is looking more like we're nabbing the ones with appointments in court or at ICE offices...taking the shackles off ICE seems to mean "concentrate on the low risk, low hanging fruit, build up the deportation stats.  (BTW, there's already a couple of reports that ICE has "lost" a detainee and doesn't have any paperwork on an alleged deportation.)  His fifth contracted security point has been stayed by the large part because too many people blabbed about what the plan really was, and that constitutional bit about ex post facto law.

"Tax Reform"  He had a plan...cited by some AoMers... during the campaign.  Now he's in office, Where's the Tax Reform/Relief Plan? 

"End Offshoring."  Not Done.

"Energy and Infrastructure plan initiated."  Where's the plan published?

"School Choice...Act"  Education voucher program...not introduced in Congress.

"Repeal and Replace Obamacare"  FAIL.  Apparently the president doesn't have a healthcare plan...but Paul Ryan does.

"Affordable Childcare & Elder Care"  not introduced in Congress.

"End illegal immigration"...moved money to start design of the wall, nothing introduced in Congress beyond the wall and more Border Patrol Agents.

"Restore Community Safety" more resources to the currently non-existing US Attorneys...not introduce in Congress.

"Restore National Security"  Proposed increase in DoD budget for FY 2018.  No actual budget submitted to Congress yet.

"Clean Up Corruption"  Relatives appointed to senior positions, Chair of Congressional Ethics Committee resigned, no toher action.

Dude. He can't do all this, tweet, play golf, watch Fox News all day, and fly back and forth to Florida...I think you expect way too much out of him....(Sarcasm)

From what I understand, he is calling this 100 days thing a completely unrealistic expectation, even though he used it through out his campaign.

From what I understand about his Tax plan many are saying it's a fabulous plan but he can't get his own congress on board with it.

On "Draining the Swamp" he's actually breaking with the group that actually ran on this concept, so there goes that whole thing...

Trump at Gettysburgh, PA in October 2016:

"On Nov. 8th, Americans will be voting for this 100-day plan to restore prosperity to our country, secure our communities and honesty to our government. This is my pledge to you. And if we follow these steps, we will once more have a government of, by and for the people. And importantly, we will make America great again. Believe me."

Oh, I forgot his promise to be "too busy to play golf" or even leave DC.

Anybody notice the cabinet looks more like those of Grant or Harding?

He's completed 16 of the 18 action items on that list. One is an ongoing process, the other he found a better deal. But sure. Nothing done.

He's completed 16 of the 18 action items on that list

Oh. Well.... if Shane says so without elaborating, it must be true. Everything Shane says is to be taken as Gospel without any citation or elaboration. 

Like his brilliant insights into the history of Swastikas and Confederate flags.

It's public record. Hell its on Wikipedia. You could do your own damn research like I did, or you could carry on complaining. Your choice.

Brilliant debate tactic.

"I disagree with you. Do your own damn research and prove yourself wrong".

So you chose 'complaining'.


Latest Activity

R. Max 2.0 replied to Pale Horse's discussion The French Election in the group The Great Debate
1 hour ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion The French Election in the group The Great Debate
"Indeed we have."
3 hours ago
Dustenious Treightonius updated their profile
3 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to Pale Horse's discussion The French Election in the group The Great Debate
"With the exception of Mélenchon - who is so far to the left that he's not really near anybody either, I suspect you are correct. It does not look good for LePen, but we've been surprised before."
4 hours ago
Carl Byrd replied to Carl Byrd's discussion Vacation ideas for a young family?
"Cherokee looks neat, and I see it's close to Gatlinburg which is somewhere I want to go, so I'll have to check both of those out."
6 hours ago
Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion The French Election in the group The Great Debate
"Everybody says Macron is the favorite now that there's only him and Le Pen.  All those various non-FN candidates, I believe, are more Macron-like than Le Pen-like."
6 hours ago
Carl Byrd replied to Carl Byrd's discussion Vacation ideas for a young family?
"I just looked this place up in Google Maps, looks like a place I'd really enjoy. Thanks for  the tip."
6 hours ago
D. Adonis posted a status
"I just read "De-Cluttering Your Digital Life" and decided to make some needed changes to my smartphone use/routine[s]"
7 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service