http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2013/10/some-varieties-of-bullsht.html

What interests me here is the distinction between lies and BS.  With lies, you are against the truth.  With BS, you just don't care.  

So it has a different purpose... or may not!

You may be giving BS not to convince others of your words, but to convince them of something else:  say, you give 'em a lot of crap detail about issue X, not because you care what they think of issue X, but to convince them you're smart.  You may want to distract them from something else (like why you haven't done something you promised).  You may want to make sharp, clear questions seem fuzzy, so you can get away with something.  Or not face something.

On tests, you may simply be hoping some of your guesses happen to be right.  So you make lots of them.

It reminds me of the poetry of T. S. Eliot.  He's not talking about mermaids and peaches and Michelangelo; he's talking about feeling old and insecure... but it works.

Those are my random thoughts on BS.  What's yours?  Do you BS others -- or yourself?  Is your BS detector online -- and do you find others' to work too?  (Feel free to BS, but be warned:  with a thread title like this, everybody's going to be on the lookout for it!)  

Views: 61

Replies to This Discussion

I never read the essay that made this a topic, so I won't talk about that. But I can tell you that this suggestion that big speeches are for self-promotion reminds me of what may have been the hallmark of the classical sophists. That, I suppose, would be the high end of the range. In that case, as far as I understand, there is a kind of skepticism of society--there being no knowledge of the human things, or the political things, there can be no truth. (This could be argued in this way: The science of nature studies the unchanging things--there is knowledge there; science of the very variable human things is impossible; theoretical physics is the most important, or nearly, politics the least, or nearly.) That is why persuasion is important--human beings can be dangerous, or useful--whereas truth simply does not matter.

There is a lot of this nowadays as well; I suppose that whenever there is no persuasive argument that human things do admit of scientific or philosophic inquiry, this opinion may flourish, so to speak, that there is no truth, only opinions.--I think Americans call this spin. I think it goes very far. I remember hearing Mr. Stewart & Mr. Colbert say, as a kind of defense of their shows, that they do comedy, or entertain. (Suggesting that nobody takes them seriously--they are innocent, for their activity is innocuous, & they have no influence on serious life.) But of course their comedy includes criticism of political opinions they dislike; if it is only entertainment, that is because there is no truth about the human things, or political things--all they can do is persuade those who laugh at their jokes to vote their sense of humor, so to speak...

RSS

Latest Activity

Andrew replied to Upside down bloke's discussion Nature of relationships
"You could just as well, fall and impale yourself on the handle of the utensils..."
3 minutes ago
Native Son replied to Jeremy's discussion new to the group. in the group Velo Men
" Maybe where you live.  Welcome to California.  Where the state bike equipment laws are rarely, if ever, enforced.  The rules have been in the Vehicle Code since before World War I, but you'd never know it from the number of…"
35 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Regular Joe's discussion Post Some Cool Flags
"That reminds me of Saddam's victory arch: "
41 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Regular Joe's discussion Woman is thrown out of Paris opera after cast refused to perform unless she removed Muslim veil in the group The Great Debate
"Do we even have opera over here?"
42 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Titus Techera's discussion ...after Texas Red in the group The Great Debate
"What the shit is she babbling on about? Honestly, I can understand throwing a sacrificial lamb up if Perry was running again, but an open election with no incumbent and this is the best the Dems have?"
43 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Will's discussion The red pill
""this is how I see relationships- Both men and women need to contribute, it can not be only one person." I don't think anyone would disagree with that statement.  But The Red Pill doesn't appear to be a resource center to…"
45 minutes ago
Upside down bloke commented on Will's group New Warriors
"I think the ironic thing is that at the end of the day physicality and power held sway, rather than compassion and understanding.  It made me realise that like any organisation it was only as good as it's leaders, as people are look up to…"
1 hour ago
Will commented on Will's group New Warriors
"We do have that problem, that people are loyal to persons rather than to principles, at times, and I had an awful experience of public humiliation I won't go into here, in my community.  But not in my I-group.  I made a complaint…"
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service