http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2013/10/some-varieties-of-bullsht.html

What interests me here is the distinction between lies and BS.  With lies, you are against the truth.  With BS, you just don't care.  

So it has a different purpose... or may not!

You may be giving BS not to convince others of your words, but to convince them of something else:  say, you give 'em a lot of crap detail about issue X, not because you care what they think of issue X, but to convince them you're smart.  You may want to distract them from something else (like why you haven't done something you promised).  You may want to make sharp, clear questions seem fuzzy, so you can get away with something.  Or not face something.

On tests, you may simply be hoping some of your guesses happen to be right.  So you make lots of them.

It reminds me of the poetry of T. S. Eliot.  He's not talking about mermaids and peaches and Michelangelo; he's talking about feeling old and insecure... but it works.

Those are my random thoughts on BS.  What's yours?  Do you BS others -- or yourself?  Is your BS detector online -- and do you find others' to work too?  (Feel free to BS, but be warned:  with a thread title like this, everybody's going to be on the lookout for it!)  

Views: 59

Replies to This Discussion

I never read the essay that made this a topic, so I won't talk about that. But I can tell you that this suggestion that big speeches are for self-promotion reminds me of what may have been the hallmark of the classical sophists. That, I suppose, would be the high end of the range. In that case, as far as I understand, there is a kind of skepticism of society--there being no knowledge of the human things, or the political things, there can be no truth. (This could be argued in this way: The science of nature studies the unchanging things--there is knowledge there; science of the very variable human things is impossible; theoretical physics is the most important, or nearly, politics the least, or nearly.) That is why persuasion is important--human beings can be dangerous, or useful--whereas truth simply does not matter.

There is a lot of this nowadays as well; I suppose that whenever there is no persuasive argument that human things do admit of scientific or philosophic inquiry, this opinion may flourish, so to speak, that there is no truth, only opinions.--I think Americans call this spin. I think it goes very far. I remember hearing Mr. Stewart & Mr. Colbert say, as a kind of defense of their shows, that they do comedy, or entertain. (Suggesting that nobody takes them seriously--they are innocent, for their activity is innocuous, & they have no influence on serious life.) But of course their comedy includes criticism of political opinions they dislike; if it is only entertainment, that is because there is no truth about the human things, or political things--all they can do is persuade those who laugh at their jokes to vote their sense of humor, so to speak...

RSS

Latest Activity

Ryan James replied to Simon O'Brien's discussion Hello Gentlemen
"Hello Simon, welcome to AoM."
35 minutes ago
Charles Neill commented on Luke A Sorensen's group Norse mythology
"one of my favorites from the Edda - 'Brothers will battle to bloody end, and sister's sons their sib betray, woe's in the worlk, much wantonness; [axe-age, sword-age- sundered are shields - wind-age, wolf-age, ere the world…"
43 minutes ago
Charles Neill replied to Vytautas's discussion Favorite/Most Interesting Battle in the group Armchair Generals
"we definitely have a lot of that down here! "
1 hour ago
Charles Neill replied to Vytautas's discussion Favorite/Most Interesting Battle in the group Armchair Generals
"Definitely Agincourt for me as well! After Agincourt, the French cut the fingers off of every English Longbowman they could find. To this day, the English show off their two shooting fingers at the French ('Up Yours!') in defiance."
1 hour ago
Charles Neill joined t-train's group
Thumbnail

Armchair Generals

A group for men who are interested in military history, or anything militaria.  Discuss armies of the past, great leaders, strategy, weapons, etc.See More
1 hour ago
Charles Neill replied to Regular Joe's discussion The Importance of Head Movement To Survive / Win A Fight
"Because, of course, boxing teaches us the best way to win a street fight is to spend 15 rounds toe to toe against 8 teenagers high on God knows what."
1 hour ago
Rick Shelton commented on Pale Horse's photo
Thumbnail

My Grandfather's Birthplace

"Thought it was in the South somewhere."
1 hour ago
Simon O'Brien posted a discussion

Hello Gentlemen

I thought it would be polite to introduce myself before diving headlong into the heart of the community.My name is Simon O'Brien, I hail from Hampshire in the UK.I am the very proud father of three beautiful daughters and have a Grandson and a Granddaughter.I ride an old V-twin motorcycle in all weathers and almost every day of the year.I have studied Wado-Ryu Karate for nearly 25 yearsI play guitar (as the song says 'Strictly rhythm, I don't want to make it cry or sing')Other than that I work…See More
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service