http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2013/10/some-varieties-of-bullsht.html

What interests me here is the distinction between lies and BS.  With lies, you are against the truth.  With BS, you just don't care.  

So it has a different purpose... or may not!

You may be giving BS not to convince others of your words, but to convince them of something else:  say, you give 'em a lot of crap detail about issue X, not because you care what they think of issue X, but to convince them you're smart.  You may want to distract them from something else (like why you haven't done something you promised).  You may want to make sharp, clear questions seem fuzzy, so you can get away with something.  Or not face something.

On tests, you may simply be hoping some of your guesses happen to be right.  So you make lots of them.

It reminds me of the poetry of T. S. Eliot.  He's not talking about mermaids and peaches and Michelangelo; he's talking about feeling old and insecure... but it works.

Those are my random thoughts on BS.  What's yours?  Do you BS others -- or yourself?  Is your BS detector online -- and do you find others' to work too?  (Feel free to BS, but be warned:  with a thread title like this, everybody's going to be on the lookout for it!)  

Views: 62

Latest Activity

Larry replied to Max Z's discussion I want to die.. in the group Depression (And Suicide)
"Hello, Max!  Are you taking any medications?  I take an antidepressant.  I have, for a number of years.  I still can't go without it. I do well, with it.  "
56 minutes ago
Sir replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"I didn't believe you, of course.  So I had to look it up. Now maybe I can convince my Libertarian Catholic friend that even if ideological purity beats effectiveness, he picked the wrong kind of purity."
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Johnson got boo'd for suggesting blind people shouldn't drive and 5yo's shouldn't use heroin. The delegates were quite vocal about their dissatisfaction. I'm surprised he won the nomination."
2 hours ago
Sir replied to Lucas Stickan's discussion Virile Agitur
"Sit virile?  Virilite fac sit?"
2 hours ago
Sir replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"If "reality" means "winning an election," no, definitely not.  Capital-L Libertarians value purity over actually winning anything.  If they didn't, they'd be a faction in R or D."
2 hours ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Peterson wasn't bad but I think he's auditioning for a ska band. Johnson is a Democrat and would have been a decent running mate for O'Malley. McAfee I'm pretty sure was stoned, please. Feldman is a crazy little troll doll,…"
3 hours ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"A) He hasn't spent much on Tv ads so far. Why would he figure on having to now? They don't work anymore. From the article: ""They know that they're not going to have enough money to be on TV in June and probably most of…"
3 hours ago
Andrew Reynolds joined Shane Belin's group
Thumbnail

Heavy Metal Fans

For fans of any genre of metal. Black, death, thrash, folk, melodeath, power, nu, doom, etc.
6 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service