http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2013/10/some-varieties-of-bullsht.html

What interests me here is the distinction between lies and BS.  With lies, you are against the truth.  With BS, you just don't care.  

So it has a different purpose... or may not!

You may be giving BS not to convince others of your words, but to convince them of something else:  say, you give 'em a lot of crap detail about issue X, not because you care what they think of issue X, but to convince them you're smart.  You may want to distract them from something else (like why you haven't done something you promised).  You may want to make sharp, clear questions seem fuzzy, so you can get away with something.  Or not face something.

On tests, you may simply be hoping some of your guesses happen to be right.  So you make lots of them.

It reminds me of the poetry of T. S. Eliot.  He's not talking about mermaids and peaches and Michelangelo; he's talking about feeling old and insecure... but it works.

Those are my random thoughts on BS.  What's yours?  Do you BS others -- or yourself?  Is your BS detector online -- and do you find others' to work too?  (Feel free to BS, but be warned:  with a thread title like this, everybody's going to be on the lookout for it!)  

Views: 62

Replies to This Discussion

I never read the essay that made this a topic, so I won't talk about that. But I can tell you that this suggestion that big speeches are for self-promotion reminds me of what may have been the hallmark of the classical sophists. That, I suppose, would be the high end of the range. In that case, as far as I understand, there is a kind of skepticism of society--there being no knowledge of the human things, or the political things, there can be no truth. (This could be argued in this way: The science of nature studies the unchanging things--there is knowledge there; science of the very variable human things is impossible; theoretical physics is the most important, or nearly, politics the least, or nearly.) That is why persuasion is important--human beings can be dangerous, or useful--whereas truth simply does not matter.

There is a lot of this nowadays as well; I suppose that whenever there is no persuasive argument that human things do admit of scientific or philosophic inquiry, this opinion may flourish, so to speak, that there is no truth, only opinions.--I think Americans call this spin. I think it goes very far. I remember hearing Mr. Stewart & Mr. Colbert say, as a kind of defense of their shows, that they do comedy, or entertain. (Suggesting that nobody takes them seriously--they are innocent, for their activity is innocuous, & they have no influence on serious life.) But of course their comedy includes criticism of political opinions they dislike; if it is only entertainment, that is because there is no truth about the human things, or political things--all they can do is persuade those who laugh at their jokes to vote their sense of humor, so to speak...

RSS

Latest Activity

Liam Strain replied to Rob's discussion Paying for your own harassment and ritual humiliation
"I don't disagree with you. I was reacting to Rick's comment about being in the other's shoes, and how that might affect our impression of a school's policies. My statement remains the same, empathy is not precluded by facts. And…"
4 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Rob's discussion Paying for your own harassment and ritual humiliation
"Seriously?  You think there's a reasonable argument for forcibly restricting the movement of an individual who did nothing wrong?  At the whim of a crime victim whose fear of him is admittedly irrational?  I'd like to…"
9 minutes ago
Al Salil replied to whiskyjack's discussion Did anyone else get a "group email" from Gnostic Bishop? in the group Christian Men
"Penelope, There is a difference between being tested by God for your ultimate benefit, and when the desires of your flesh lead you astray 1 Cor 10:13: "There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who…"
12 minutes ago
BesView 422 posted a discussion

Curt Schilling and his daughter Gabby

If any of you have not seen, or heard about, or read of the vitriol which Curt and Gabby Schilling have had to endure, get ready to be astounded.  We have wives, girlfriends, sisters and daughters whom we love, treasure and revere.  We also have brothers, friends, buds, and sons who can sometimes cause us embarrassment.  Herein is a lesson for both:https://38pitches.wordpress.com/See More
20 minutes ago
Penelope replied to whiskyjack's discussion Did anyone else get a "group email" from Gnostic Bishop? in the group Christian Men
"Genesis 22:1 I think there's also a NT passage that refers to God tempting us. It's usually translated "try" or "test," but it's actually the same Greek word as "tempt" from James."
30 minutes ago
Penelope replied to Rob's discussion Paying for your own harassment and ritual humiliation
"I went to tiny schools, then I went to university too long ago that this was really a thing everyone talked about, and it was grad school, etc. So I'm confused. I suppose, when I was at university, if I had been assaulted and wanted the…"
48 minutes ago
Kev O'Connor posted photos
1 hour ago
Rusty Rogers left a comment for Randy Oller
"Welcome"
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service