http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2013/10/some-varieties-of-bullsht.html

What interests me here is the distinction between lies and BS.  With lies, you are against the truth.  With BS, you just don't care.  

So it has a different purpose... or may not!

You may be giving BS not to convince others of your words, but to convince them of something else:  say, you give 'em a lot of crap detail about issue X, not because you care what they think of issue X, but to convince them you're smart.  You may want to distract them from something else (like why you haven't done something you promised).  You may want to make sharp, clear questions seem fuzzy, so you can get away with something.  Or not face something.

On tests, you may simply be hoping some of your guesses happen to be right.  So you make lots of them.

It reminds me of the poetry of T. S. Eliot.  He's not talking about mermaids and peaches and Michelangelo; he's talking about feeling old and insecure... but it works.

Those are my random thoughts on BS.  What's yours?  Do you BS others -- or yourself?  Is your BS detector online -- and do you find others' to work too?  (Feel free to BS, but be warned:  with a thread title like this, everybody's going to be on the lookout for it!)  

Views: 62

Latest Activity

Profile IconJosh Solo, Wallace Jones, Christopher J Stanley and 8 more joined Art of Manliness
11 minutes ago
Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion Unpopular Political and Religious Opinions in the group The Great Debate
"I saw Triumph of the Will with the sound off.  IDK what he was saying, but he looked righteous and furious.  I suppose it worked for his audience.  Modern people need someone to look righteous and calm and measured and say the…"
32 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"2 more scandals for each candidate. Poll changes sides 3 times. Hillary wins. Conservatives collectively shit themselves. Trump sues someone. Another Benghazi hearing. Nothing really changes."
57 minutes ago
Sir replied to Braeden P.D.'s discussion Post-Mortem Symposium
"I can see asking WTF were you thinking of Hitler, Marx, and IDK much about Xerxes.  But what would your question mean as addressed to Washington, Einstein, and the actor?"
2 hours ago
Frank replied to Braeden P.D.'s discussion Post-Mortem Symposium
"1. George Washington 2. Carl Marks 3. Adolf Hitler 4. Xerxes "Spelling" 5. Albert Einstein 6. Rick Grimmes "the Walking Dead". I know he is an actor and not dead. But I would like to have all these people sit down with a list of…"
5 hours ago
Frank replied to Braeden P.D.'s discussion Post-Mortem Symposium
"She was not deleting emails lol"
5 hours ago
Frank replied to Max Z's discussion Not enlightened enough...
"Plenty of ways to exorcise your mind. Podcasts youtube, documentaries. I have a hard time reading at times due to being legally blind. But I do love books It takes a bit longer to read than most people. I may learn braille some day, but remember…"
5 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion Unpopular Political and Religious Opinions in the group The Great Debate
"Idk if this is political, so better safe than sorry: I admire one facet of Hitler. I think he was a great orator. I know that's not a novel thought but people act as if admiring one trait is the same as admiring the man. Also, the Nazis had…"
7 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service