http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2013/10/some-varieties-of-bullsht.html

What interests me here is the distinction between lies and BS.  With lies, you are against the truth.  With BS, you just don't care.  

So it has a different purpose... or may not!

You may be giving BS not to convince others of your words, but to convince them of something else:  say, you give 'em a lot of crap detail about issue X, not because you care what they think of issue X, but to convince them you're smart.  You may want to distract them from something else (like why you haven't done something you promised).  You may want to make sharp, clear questions seem fuzzy, so you can get away with something.  Or not face something.

On tests, you may simply be hoping some of your guesses happen to be right.  So you make lots of them.

It reminds me of the poetry of T. S. Eliot.  He's not talking about mermaids and peaches and Michelangelo; he's talking about feeling old and insecure... but it works.

Those are my random thoughts on BS.  What's yours?  Do you BS others -- or yourself?  Is your BS detector online -- and do you find others' to work too?  (Feel free to BS, but be warned:  with a thread title like this, everybody's going to be on the lookout for it!)  

Views: 62

Replies to This Discussion

I never read the essay that made this a topic, so I won't talk about that. But I can tell you that this suggestion that big speeches are for self-promotion reminds me of what may have been the hallmark of the classical sophists. That, I suppose, would be the high end of the range. In that case, as far as I understand, there is a kind of skepticism of society--there being no knowledge of the human things, or the political things, there can be no truth. (This could be argued in this way: The science of nature studies the unchanging things--there is knowledge there; science of the very variable human things is impossible; theoretical physics is the most important, or nearly, politics the least, or nearly.) That is why persuasion is important--human beings can be dangerous, or useful--whereas truth simply does not matter.

There is a lot of this nowadays as well; I suppose that whenever there is no persuasive argument that human things do admit of scientific or philosophic inquiry, this opinion may flourish, so to speak, that there is no truth, only opinions.--I think Americans call this spin. I think it goes very far. I remember hearing Mr. Stewart & Mr. Colbert say, as a kind of defense of their shows, that they do comedy, or entertain. (Suggesting that nobody takes them seriously--they are innocent, for their activity is innocuous, & they have no influence on serious life.) But of course their comedy includes criticism of political opinions they dislike; if it is only entertainment, that is because there is no truth about the human things, or political things--all they can do is persuade those who laugh at their jokes to vote their sense of humor, so to speak...

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Rob's discussion Paying for your own harassment and ritual humiliation
"Doesn't matter if it's a trend or not. Bullshit is bullshit. That any one person thought this was ok is a problem. That an administration thought it was ok is a definite problem. This is a problem which needs kicked in the nuts before it…"
38 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Rob's discussion Paying for your own harassment and ritual humiliation
"Actually winning the MegaMillions would probably change my personal view on statistics, but it wouldn't change the reality of those statistics. While yes, sometimes we have to look at things from the other side just as much as we have to take…"
53 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Rob's discussion Paying for your own harassment and ritual humiliation
"True.  Majority with an inferiority complex. JB "
58 minutes ago
Shane replied to Rob's discussion Paying for your own harassment and ritual humiliation
"Women aren't minorities."
1 hour ago
Josh100LuBu commented on Vendetta5885's photo
Thumbnail

Electro Shock Therapy

"Wow, great photo. "
1 hour ago
Shane commented on Vendetta5885's photo
Thumbnail

Electro Shock Therapy

"Hmmmm. Seems like the exact opposite of what you'd want to do."
3 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to Rob's discussion Paying for your own harassment and ritual humiliation
"Second ... isn't most anti-discrimination policy built 'for the 1 out of 100,000' (give or take)?  It is explicitly for the protection of minorities -- the fewer the better.  I have a hard time thinking special…"
3 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to Rob's discussion Paying for your own harassment and ritual humiliation
"The 'policy' of not intentionally punishing the innocent is hardly "built for the 1 out of 100,000".  It's a pretty fundamental policy of American jurisprudence.  It's the basis of warrant law, search and…"
3 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service