My wife picked me up a 1920s vintage Gillette as an anniversary gift this week, I've been using a Murkur for the past 14 or 15 years, it was my first experience with an open comb razor and I noticed a huge difference, much more so than I expected.
First of all, the shave seemed considerably closer and although it didn't draw any blood I had quite a bit of stinging when I applied after shave. I thought for sure that meant I was going to have serious razor burn but it never materialized.
I think it will require a lot more attention to technique than my Murker and I doubt I'll dare to try any against the grain shaving with it just yet.
Anyone else use an open comb? Thoughts, opinions or tips?

Views: 102

Replies to This Discussion

I switched to a current production open comb 15c Merkur from my mid 1960s vintage Gillette Adjustable a month ago and I found I got superior shaves with next to no nicks and I have not had any trouble with razor burn since the switch over.
I switched back to DE saftey razors awhile back after finding my grandfather's Gillettes in a box one day.
After using both his 1960's Superspeed and the 1920's open-comb short handled safety razor, I find that the open comb allows for a very close shave with fewer nicks than the Superspeed. Although it takes a little longer to use, the open comb has become my favorite razor, bar none.

This is it:

My gillette old feels about as aggressive as my tech, but it doesn't block with lather as quickly. If you apply too much pressure you might get the skin into the grooves and burn your face a bit, but without weight there shouldn't be a difference (i think the blade exposure on the olds/news is pretty tame).
I use an open comb Merkur, and I like my results. If I get lazy with it, I'll get a nick or two, but none usually, just a close shave. I've never used another DE before, as I only made the switch a few months back.

RSS

Latest Activity

John Muir replied to Christian Schmidt's discussion Let's Have A Spoiled Christmas
"My Sock of Choice (and they don't itch)"
15 minutes ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"The summary is on the first page."
31 minutes ago
John Muir replied to Regular Joe's discussion BREAKING: US To Normalize Relations With Cuba in the group The Great Debate
"Missiles have effective ranges. I think a location from which you can fire on your enemy has greater tactical value than one from which you cannot. Your "Kennedy Was A Coward" argument seems really strange - It's just…"
36 minutes ago
Jay D replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"Can you summarize what´s is in the 26 pages, since nobody me included will read it? Does it just state that evidence that was gathered illegal can be used or does it say cops dont get punished if they are stupid enough to act following laws…"
38 minutes ago
Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Oil in the group The Great Debate
"You have that backwards."
43 minutes ago
Jay D replied to Leto Atreides II's discussion Sony pulls The Interview Christmas Release in the group The Great Debate
"Damn those poor suckers who hacked Sony will be suprised then the Nato kicks in their doors."
44 minutes ago
Jay D replied to Leto Atreides II's discussion Sony pulls The Interview Christmas Release in the group The Great Debate
"And that Newt Gingrich guy."
44 minutes ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"It's a little more serious than that. See, if I break a law I don't know about or don't understand, I'm still culpable. Previously, under our search and seizure rights guaranteed by our constitution, if a search was made under…"
47 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service