Is it preferable to be mortal or immortal?

As humans, we are aware of our own mortality from a very early age, and the presence of that knowledge pervades everything we as individuals and as society do. If medical science were advanced enough to grant us immortality, should we take it? Or by doing so would we lose a central part of our humanity?

Tags: 7, Day, Immortality, Mortality, Question

Views: 21

Replies to This Discussion

If by immortality we mean you can *never* die, maybe that would be too much. Sounds like a Greek myth: someone cursed by never being allowed to die.

If it means you won't die of old age...it would be interesting to see what five hundred year old people would be like. Oldsters now are less tolerant of risk, often more set in their ways. They're sometimes (not always) less doctrinaire than they were in their youth. Would a thousand-year-old man be stuck in 600-year-old routine, disdaining to do anything uncomfortable or risky, and dismissing college-age idealism as a waste of time? Or would he have to reset to an earlier perspective? Don't know.
Intriguing thought. However, I disagree with the premise. While we are aware of our own mortality, we also have a deep set idea that we aren't supposed to die. If we are all aware that we will die, and that it is supposed to be that way, when they do we fight death as hard as we do?

I think living with the idea that what we do is eternal is not counter to our humanity, but in fact central.
If we alter the characteristics of humanity we alter the way we define it. I don't know if we would lose or gain anything, but it would be different. I do know that it would be very crowded and that the current problems with the social security system would seem mild by comparison.
What if it is the simple fact that we mortal that makes us try and define good and evil and at least try to be good and live the good life? If so, our mortality might indeed be the most central part of our humanity.

Might an immortal being be less concerned with morality because they could get away with so much more without the consequence of death? If so, would immortality be central to inhumanity?
Being an immortal would SUCK.

Can YOU imagine being in a war for 200-300 years?
People would be down in the dumps all the time because there would be no excuse to have goals. "I must do this thing before I die." Can't commit suicide because I'm a frickin' immortal.

Anyway, I have holy rollers who come to my front door promising me immortality if I only write them a check. I just tell them that it's an awfully selfish thing to want to live forever and to continue crowding the planet & using up resourses.



Please allow me to die and do not turn me into a zombie.
It's best to reflect on the "forbidden fruit" scene in Milton's Paradise Lost and in Genesis.
I would lovee to be immortal, I was born a loner so I don't believe that it would bother me too much as long as I stayed secluded and only went to people if I needed something. Of course this would automatically turn anyone into a psycic vampire but you could come out into public with your immortality and become the wisest council that ever lived.

RSS

Latest Activity

Jack Bauer commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"that the present House/Senate could pass anything that had a prayer of working any better. Then pass nothing.  Legislation that doesn't work not an inherent good.  When you're screwing with peoples lives, trying and failing is…"
2 minutes ago
Russell Wilson replied to Kevin's discussion Will someone please explain Jesus to me? in the group Christian Men
"There are a number of interpretations on this verse, Kevin. A good study Bible can help address some of these difficult passages. In my humble opinion, the ESV Study Bible is an amazing, inexpensive resource! You can get…"
4 minutes ago
Jack Bauer commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"The fine is directly because of the law.  That's inarguable.  The confusion is certainly arguably related.   Obamacare has demonstrably made things worse, especially when considered alongside the upheaval and expenditure…"
12 minutes ago
Nick D Wylie updated their profile
14 minutes ago
Steve Dallas commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"Like Liam said, I doubt  you could find a liberal/progressive that can't find fault with the law. The vast majority of us who are old enough embraced the Clinton's when they turned it down in '93. We just are so "dense"…"
15 minutes ago
Lucius Artorius Castus commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"I'm just not seeing the benefit. 800k new insurance sign ups, and $1 trillion spent. Then people like Steve are still uninsured. So what's the point exactly? To spend a shot load of money to say, "oh we tried"?"
16 minutes ago
Liam S. commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"It's not that we don't find fault in it. We do. It's that the fault we find, tends to be less than the faults in the system nobody was trying to fix before... and that some of what we do see go wrong - per Steve's case, is not…"
24 minutes ago
Izzy posted a group
Thumbnail

The Best in Streaming Video

To answer the eternal question: Is there anything good on television to watch? Are you always looking for the next great show, movie, event on television and would like to see what other folks are recommending. Then this group is for you. I currently have Netflix, Hulu and Amazon Prime and sometimes I'll spend an hour trying to figure out what to watch or I just throw my hands up in frustration...Help!!!See More
32 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service