Is hunting for sport an ethical pursuit?

In Western society, the need to hunt for food has long since been luxury, and not a necessity. So, is it right to take animal life for sport?

EDIT: OK, so I posted this a bit late and probably didn't elaborate enough. What I was trying to ask with this question is that, in the present day, we've come to rely on obtaining our food from supermarkets, pre-pakaged in handy, ready-to-eat portions. Many people would prefer to hunt for their food, despite the fact that plenty of food is readily available, provided from domesticated animals.

What I want to know is whether given the abundance of food available (specifically in the West), should we be hunting wild animals? Is there a moral difference between killing a domesticated animal and a wild one? What of trophy hunting, where animals are merely killed for the fun of it?

Further to all this, Is the way in which an animal killed significant? Is it any less valid to hunt a dear with an assault rifle than with a bow and arrow? Is it any less cruel to kill a cow "humanely" in a slaughterhouse than kill a bird with a shotgun?

I'm sure we have a lot of hunters in this community, and a lot of people who abhorr the idea. I'd be interested in discussing the arguments for and against hunting, and for that matter, the arguments for and against the domestication of animals for food. At the end of the day, eating flesh comes naturally to the vast majority of humans on this planet, so is there a "best" way to manage this food source?

Views: 76

Replies to This Discussion

How do you define "right" in this case?
"Right" would mean ethically permissible.

I'd like to point out, first off, that shooting a deer in the woods is far more humane than buying prepackaged beef. Most cows are raised in factory farms and lead brutish and short lives before being slaughtered. A wild deer on the other hand can at lease enjoy a fulfilling life before it is killed.

But the question isn't addressing whether it's okay to hunt for food. A vegetarian diet is cheaper and healthier for most Americans. Hunting may once have been human necessity, but now it a luxury.

I'd like to discuss this issue more, but for now I'll just say that as long you don't waste the meat, hunting for any purpose is at least as defensible as purchasing it prepackaged.
Do you just mean trophy hunting?
Hunting and killing an animal just for the fun of it is not something I would say is right. There are people who live far from more urban, civilized areas where food is more easily attainable, and these people do not always have a choice in the matter, they sometimes have to hunt to provide for their family. They must consider the costs of gas to travel long distances to and from to buy food, the costs of the food itself, take into consideration how much they need to buy to make it last, and so on and so forth. For them, the hunt is the best way they can feed their family, and I will not consider them any less of a person for it.

Although, none of this is to say I am against a person learning how to hunt and kill an animal. If I was, for whatever reason, stranded somewhere, I would much rather know how to track, kill and cook animals, as well knowing what plants are safe to eat for nutrients and hydration, than not know.
For many, hunting encompasses many more emotions and philosophic questions than merely "right or wrong". Some hunt in order to reconnect with nature and to experience the physical requirements of the chase. The question and especially the amplification of the question introduce several other issues, both philosphic and political to the debate. Hunting, as a test of skills and as a test of personal integrity is one aspect. As a method of insuring survival is another aspect. Hunting, to preserve crops, herds, and lives is a third aspect of the question. And, lastly, hunting as an acceptable method for men to channel their ancestral heritage as both an organized pack predator and a solo stalk and take predator is necessary for the psyche of the species. In the last, note that criminal gangs adopt the posture of pack predators. And it must be noted that ethical sport hunting requires the acquisition and use of multiple self-disciplined skills...which directly related to the sound mind in sound body ethos.
Hunting for sport=ethical
Hunting and killing for food=ethical
Hunting and killing for population control and safety of humankind=ethical
Killing for trophy=unethical
Taking a trophy from results of ethical hunting/killing=ethical
Hunting with assault rifle=dumb/dangerous
Any manner of slaughter that prolongs or causes excessive pain before death=unethical
Any manner of slaughter which is swift and effecient=ethical
Why is hunting for sport ethical when killing for trophies is not?
Hunting and killing aren't always the same thing. I'm referring to the the process of hunting, tracking, stalking, baiting, and trapping. Doing that for sport is fun and good for you. But if you were to hunt something then kill it just for its head or hide, it is a waste, a waste of life, a waste of resources, and it is defective as you unneccessarily disable the animal from fulfilling its larger purpose.
Ah, that makes sense then :)

RSS

Latest Activity

Patrick E replied to Greatman's discussion Shirtless career in the group The Shirtless Man
"I'm the same. I'm so used to being shirtless that I hardly think about it, until I suddenly find myself in the college library or some other place where I begin to notice strangers giving me sideways glances. But virtually everyone who…"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Braeden 2.0's discussion The Horror of Day to Day Life
"I was a subsistence hunter for most of my adult life. I highly recommend putting yourself at the top of the food chain. Even if you're a vegetarian. You should know the work that goes into keeping you alive for a year."
9 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Braeden 2.0's discussion The Horror of Day to Day Life
"I don't see how any Judeo-Christian or Darwinist could feel uncomfortable with eating meat. For each it's just a natural part of the ecosystem."
10 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to Braeden 2.0's discussion The Horror of Day to Day Life
"Maybe it's just me ... but describing carnivorism as "eating flesh cut from corpses of conquered lower life-forms" still wouldn't strike me as at all horrific.  Just the reality of life.  Some life -- maybe even most --…"
10 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Braeden 2.0's discussion The Horror of Day to Day Life
"Y'all are pussies. You're supposed to grow out of that kind of squeamishness before puberty. And here I thought I'd found a thread on the horror of mundanity."
11 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Lumberjoe's discussion Some People Dislike The New LGBTQ(etc.) Pride Flag Because Racism in the group The Great Debate
"I generally divide political factions into four groups, simply because most people fall into one of these four groups whether they think they do or not. First and second are low-itelligence left and right. Both are vulgar followers who think…"
11 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Cody "Rooster" McDonnell's discussion Sailing Crew Needed
"If I were naive and carefree I'd pack my bag right now. Sounds like a blast. Godspeed."
12 hours ago
Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"@Jay What makes you think I'm going to go point by point to debunk your bullshit when you don't actually care? BTW, just glancing at it, the third on the list is bullshit too. @Dom He didn't say yes. He said, "ummm. I guess…"
15 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service