Is hunting for sport an ethical pursuit?

In Western society, the need to hunt for food has long since been luxury, and not a necessity. So, is it right to take animal life for sport?

EDIT: OK, so I posted this a bit late and probably didn't elaborate enough. What I was trying to ask with this question is that, in the present day, we've come to rely on obtaining our food from supermarkets, pre-pakaged in handy, ready-to-eat portions. Many people would prefer to hunt for their food, despite the fact that plenty of food is readily available, provided from domesticated animals.

What I want to know is whether given the abundance of food available (specifically in the West), should we be hunting wild animals? Is there a moral difference between killing a domesticated animal and a wild one? What of trophy hunting, where animals are merely killed for the fun of it?

Further to all this, Is the way in which an animal killed significant? Is it any less valid to hunt a dear with an assault rifle than with a bow and arrow? Is it any less cruel to kill a cow "humanely" in a slaughterhouse than kill a bird with a shotgun?

I'm sure we have a lot of hunters in this community, and a lot of people who abhorr the idea. I'd be interested in discussing the arguments for and against hunting, and for that matter, the arguments for and against the domestication of animals for food. At the end of the day, eating flesh comes naturally to the vast majority of humans on this planet, so is there a "best" way to manage this food source?

Views: 61

Replies to This Discussion

How do you define "right" in this case?
"Right" would mean ethically permissible.

I'd like to point out, first off, that shooting a deer in the woods is far more humane than buying prepackaged beef. Most cows are raised in factory farms and lead brutish and short lives before being slaughtered. A wild deer on the other hand can at lease enjoy a fulfilling life before it is killed.

But the question isn't addressing whether it's okay to hunt for food. A vegetarian diet is cheaper and healthier for most Americans. Hunting may once have been human necessity, but now it a luxury.

I'd like to discuss this issue more, but for now I'll just say that as long you don't waste the meat, hunting for any purpose is at least as defensible as purchasing it prepackaged.
Do you just mean trophy hunting?
Hunting and killing an animal just for the fun of it is not something I would say is right. There are people who live far from more urban, civilized areas where food is more easily attainable, and these people do not always have a choice in the matter, they sometimes have to hunt to provide for their family. They must consider the costs of gas to travel long distances to and from to buy food, the costs of the food itself, take into consideration how much they need to buy to make it last, and so on and so forth. For them, the hunt is the best way they can feed their family, and I will not consider them any less of a person for it.

Although, none of this is to say I am against a person learning how to hunt and kill an animal. If I was, for whatever reason, stranded somewhere, I would much rather know how to track, kill and cook animals, as well knowing what plants are safe to eat for nutrients and hydration, than not know.
For many, hunting encompasses many more emotions and philosophic questions than merely "right or wrong". Some hunt in order to reconnect with nature and to experience the physical requirements of the chase. The question and especially the amplification of the question introduce several other issues, both philosphic and political to the debate. Hunting, as a test of skills and as a test of personal integrity is one aspect. As a method of insuring survival is another aspect. Hunting, to preserve crops, herds, and lives is a third aspect of the question. And, lastly, hunting as an acceptable method for men to channel their ancestral heritage as both an organized pack predator and a solo stalk and take predator is necessary for the psyche of the species. In the last, note that criminal gangs adopt the posture of pack predators. And it must be noted that ethical sport hunting requires the acquisition and use of multiple self-disciplined skills...which directly related to the sound mind in sound body ethos.
Hunting for sport=ethical
Hunting and killing for food=ethical
Hunting and killing for population control and safety of humankind=ethical
Killing for trophy=unethical
Taking a trophy from results of ethical hunting/killing=ethical
Hunting with assault rifle=dumb/dangerous
Any manner of slaughter that prolongs or causes excessive pain before death=unethical
Any manner of slaughter which is swift and effecient=ethical
Why is hunting for sport ethical when killing for trophies is not?
Hunting and killing aren't always the same thing. I'm referring to the the process of hunting, tracking, stalking, baiting, and trapping. Doing that for sport is fun and good for you. But if you were to hunt something then kill it just for its head or hide, it is a waste, a waste of life, a waste of resources, and it is defective as you unneccessarily disable the animal from fulfilling its larger purpose.
Ah, that makes sense then :)

RSS

Latest Activity

Jack Bauer replied to Salt Dragon's discussion Advice re abusive boyfriend of ex
"You can't help someone who doesn't want to be helped.  Protect your boys.  Let her know you're there to help if she needs it.  Otherwise ... you might as well mind your own business.  She's not going to listen…"
11 minutes ago
Salt Dragon posted a discussion

Advice re abusive boyfriend of ex

My ex has been dating an alcoholic abusive policemen on and off for about 4 years.  After she sued him for damages related to an injury from his drunken rage, they parted ways for a year and a half but now appear to be back together.  She is keeping him away from our sons (now 11 and 13) but her personality changes a lot when they are together.  She disconnects maternally from our sons and becomes combative to me and her family of origin.  Unless there is some trauma to boys, I don’t have good…See More
30 minutes ago
Terry Walley updated their profile
52 minutes ago
Salt Dragon replied to leadership's discussion How can a man know that he has achieved manhood and earned the title of man?
"Id say we get pubic hair in our early teens and then spend the rest of our lives figuring out what it means to be a man.  Enjoy the journey.  Initiation and mentoring help, along with maintaining life-long male friendships, which is quite…"
52 minutes ago
Salt Dragon replied to Milo Morris's discussion Gay Republicans in the group Out to Build Bridges
"I watched the yiannopoulosm video and one quote caught my attention:  in an outrage culture, it pays to be outrageous.  He and Donald Trump are more about their personal brands than anything substantial.  The divisism of both may have…"
1 hour ago
Salt Dragon replied to David R.'s discussion Christians in the group Out to Build Bridges
"There is an inherent rift in Christianity behind this blasphemy.  Jesus spoke of "we" and "all are one" blind to differences, but Paul said to speak to people to tell them what they want to hear (my own…"
1 hour ago
Daniel replied to leadership's discussion Meeting a girl online: A good introduction message
"I'll admit to sometimes browsing Tinder (which is maybe a different crowd than Christian Mingle, but there are a lot Christians). I usually just send a setup to a joke. They have to respond to get the punchline, so it gets some back and forth…"
2 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Only reporting I saw was noting the presence of a Palestinian flag on the floor of the convention, and a Soviet flag at what looked like a Bernie-fan protest march outside of the hall. Much ado about nothing.  Kinda like the half-dozen tweets…"
4 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service