I saw this one online a few days ago, and it really got me thinking:

Is the unexamined life a life worth living?

As I understand it, this question asks whether a person who is capable of truly analysing his own actions is truly able to better himself, or if the process of self-examination somehow corrupts the essence of the individual. Can thinking about oneself too much cause a person to lose sight of the bigger picture and somehow over-complicate things? Is just letting things be the better option?

Personally, I would say that I owe a large part of who I am to my ability to be self-critical. I know lot of people who don't do this and they seem perfectly happy though. I find this question hard to answer as I really can't imagine not being self-critical. I think that it falls into the category of Ignorance is Bliss. Would you prefer ignorance if it guaranteed happiness, or do you derive a deeper level of happiness from investigating things in greater detail? Personally the latter is my choice.

What do you think?

Views: 32

Replies to This Discussion

I have a strip I wrote and illustrated awhile back dealing with a person perception of reality after developing cap graws sydrome. The final words of his doctor were "The unexamined life is not worth living and the overexamined life is unlivable. What a beautiful night." An thats my basic take on the subject.

RSS

Latest Activity

Nick M replied to superjoe's discussion What is the proper etiquette when deciding not to start a relationship after four dates? Did this girl do me wrong?
"I would say you are reading way too much into it. You said you were dating for a month and a half.  You had 4 dates in that time. There is a difference between going on dates and dating. if you were in a relationship then a conversation is…"
1 hour ago
Larrikin Dan replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Aye, and there is a RUSH now within the Bernista framework to get people from the American Independent Party to NPP by May 23rd. And that is what he is hinging on - he does want to WIN the office, so if he has to take that route, he will."
2 hours ago
Native Son replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"California is "semi-open" primary. Briefly, every elected office in California except the US Presidency and specific county-level party committees is a non-partisan office, Folks registered as Democrats and "No Party Preference'…"
2 hours ago
Wordsman updated their profile
3 hours ago
Wordsman joined Slacker's group
Thumbnail

Writers

A place for writers to discuss and critique projects.
3 hours ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Sander's and Trump are one shot deals. Like Jackson or Teddy Roosevelt. As soon as it's all over, whether at the election or eight years from now, it will all go back to the way it was. This won't happen again for another 100 years.…"
3 hours ago
M. replied to James Smith's discussion Greetings from Georgia
"Welcome to AoM!"
4 hours ago
James Smith replied to Nick Thomas's discussion Hello from KY!
"Hey Nick, good luck at college! I'm heading into my freshman year as well."
4 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service