I saw this one online a few days ago, and it really got me thinking:

Is the unexamined life a life worth living?

As I understand it, this question asks whether a person who is capable of truly analysing his own actions is truly able to better himself, or if the process of self-examination somehow corrupts the essence of the individual. Can thinking about oneself too much cause a person to lose sight of the bigger picture and somehow over-complicate things? Is just letting things be the better option?

Personally, I would say that I owe a large part of who I am to my ability to be self-critical. I know lot of people who don't do this and they seem perfectly happy though. I find this question hard to answer as I really can't imagine not being self-critical. I think that it falls into the category of Ignorance is Bliss. Would you prefer ignorance if it guaranteed happiness, or do you derive a deeper level of happiness from investigating things in greater detail? Personally the latter is my choice.

What do you think?

Views: 43

Replies to This Discussion

I have a strip I wrote and illustrated awhile back dealing with a person perception of reality after developing cap graws sydrome. The final words of his doctor were "The unexamined life is not worth living and the overexamined life is unlivable. What a beautiful night." An thats my basic take on the subject.

RSS

Latest Activity

R. Max 2.0 replied to Brett McKay's discussion New Moderators
"Seems like it should be selective based on the offense.  I don't care he's back, just right now I'd rather french kiss a snapping turtle than read his posts.  I'd rather go to a hugging clinic for…"
8 minutes ago
R. Max 2.0 replied to Liam Strain's discussion June 27, 2017 - Chat not functioning
"There is another ning forum I'm apart of, just checked and it appears the chat doesn't work there either.  I'd say this is a ning thing. Heh. Ding dang ning thang."
22 minutes ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Americans, do you regret your vote? in the group The Great Debate
"That's not so much throwing me a bone as it is telling me you passed 8th grade Civics."
28 minutes ago
Braeden 2.0 replied to Braeden 2.0's discussion Attractions to other Cultures and Revulsion towards other Cultures
">Pagan >Secular Pick one."
59 minutes ago
Liam Strain replied to Brett McKay's discussion New Moderators
"I tend to think of it as a three strikes rule. Can't do it infinitely, and pre-banned users are on a shorter leash. At any rate, we've made too many exceptions in the past to be hard-asses about it now. "
59 minutes ago
Braeden 2.0 replied to Brett McKay's discussion New Moderators
"This is the only forum I've heard of that allows banned users to come back under new accounts It shouldn't be permitted, and makes the act of banning completely pointless."
1 hour ago
Ovid replied to Brett McKay's discussion New Moderators
"Fair enough, I agree so I deleted the post. I will just stick with the point that I was immediately banned after criticizing Sir's mod actions and suggesting that another member would be better as a mod, so the ban seemed spiteful and…"
1 hour ago
Ovid replied to Pale Horse's discussion Our Current Western Zeitgeist in the group The Great Debate
"I'm not sure why this devolved into such as pissing match. I'll try to recap. To me it seems like you want a black/white answer that "being gay is easier today than it was 50 years ago". My argument is that, yes in some ways it…"
1 hour ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service