I saw this one online a few days ago, and it really got me thinking:

Is the unexamined life a life worth living?

As I understand it, this question asks whether a person who is capable of truly analysing his own actions is truly able to better himself, or if the process of self-examination somehow corrupts the essence of the individual. Can thinking about oneself too much cause a person to lose sight of the bigger picture and somehow over-complicate things? Is just letting things be the better option?

Personally, I would say that I owe a large part of who I am to my ability to be self-critical. I know lot of people who don't do this and they seem perfectly happy though. I find this question hard to answer as I really can't imagine not being self-critical. I think that it falls into the category of Ignorance is Bliss. Would you prefer ignorance if it guaranteed happiness, or do you derive a deeper level of happiness from investigating things in greater detail? Personally the latter is my choice.

What do you think?

Views: 45

Replies to This Discussion

I have a strip I wrote and illustrated awhile back dealing with a person perception of reality after developing cap graws sydrome. The final words of his doctor were "The unexamined life is not worth living and the overexamined life is unlivable. What a beautiful night." An thats my basic take on the subject.

RSS

Latest Activity

Specs joined Liam Strain's group
Thumbnail

AoM Secrets and Mysteries

A place for the open discussion of alternative metaphysics, the occult, magick, paganism, and other cosmologies not otherwise represented.
2 hours ago
Roger Adam replied to Christopher Everet's discussion How do you handle just being friends with your crush?
"I agree"
3 hours ago
Roger Adam replied to Jesse Dean's discussion What Would You Do?
"Yeah! it was just for fun "
3 hours ago
Roger Adam replied to Jesse Dean's discussion What Would You Do?
"Exactly!!"
3 hours ago
Roger Adam replied to Eric Lindberg's discussion What is the manliest job you ever had?
"Construction"
3 hours ago
John Muir replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"I can speak for my family - which contained at least 4 confederate soldiers in my immediate lineage.  I know they were opposed to slavery because they were buried in cemeteries in the Wesleyan Methodist churches they were baptized before the…"
4 hours ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Moq"
5 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Whom are you replying to?"
6 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service