I saw this one online a few days ago, and it really got me thinking:

Is the unexamined life a life worth living?

As I understand it, this question asks whether a person who is capable of truly analysing his own actions is truly able to better himself, or if the process of self-examination somehow corrupts the essence of the individual. Can thinking about oneself too much cause a person to lose sight of the bigger picture and somehow over-complicate things? Is just letting things be the better option?

Personally, I would say that I owe a large part of who I am to my ability to be self-critical. I know lot of people who don't do this and they seem perfectly happy though. I find this question hard to answer as I really can't imagine not being self-critical. I think that it falls into the category of Ignorance is Bliss. Would you prefer ignorance if it guaranteed happiness, or do you derive a deeper level of happiness from investigating things in greater detail? Personally the latter is my choice.

What do you think?

Views: 37

Replies to This Discussion

I have a strip I wrote and illustrated awhile back dealing with a person perception of reality after developing cap graws sydrome. The final words of his doctor were "The unexamined life is not worth living and the overexamined life is unlivable. What a beautiful night." An thats my basic take on the subject.

RSS

Latest Activity

Aaron F Kendrick replied to Sir's discussion How far apart we are in the group The Great Debate
"Sorry, but I think the whole discussion lost reason long ago.  I am just not sure at what point.  I abandoned political parties after I read what George Washington prophesied abut them.  Every bit of it has come true.  I despise…"
13 minutes ago
David Shalamov updated their profile
35 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"Not dredging anything up, but this is what we have now.  Just for people to look at.  Let's please not get into anything on the comment…"
40 minutes ago
Liam Strain replied to floyd james's discussion What has happened to masculinity
"I can see that - and yes, there is something to be admired in not apologizing for who you are, etc. Trump, however, has specifically stated that he does not apologize at all - and that's a stance I cannot support. "
45 minutes ago
Sir commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"I've talked to Liam a bit, but we have not decided on a way to deal with the decline in civility at TGD.  We hate to start banning people who are longstanding community members. Trump's wall is no longer a topic in the comments, but…"
3 hours ago
Bobby Popowicz joined Brian Burnham's group
Thumbnail

Remembering Dad

This is a group for men who have lost their fathers. It is a place to mourn, celebrate, and remember our fathers and a place for men to share experiences and draw strength from one another.See More
3 hours ago
Jack Bauer commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"You can just turn off e-mail notifications.  I did that a LONG time ago.  I don't see or hear anything from this board unless I come here to read it."
3 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to floyd james's discussion What has happened to masculinity
"I can see how 'unapologetic' could be considered a virtue.  It's not really about screwing-up ... it's about not apologizing for who you are, what you believe, or what you're about. I know who I am, what I believe ...…"
3 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service