I saw this one online a few days ago, and it really got me thinking:

Is the unexamined life a life worth living?

As I understand it, this question asks whether a person who is capable of truly analysing his own actions is truly able to better himself, or if the process of self-examination somehow corrupts the essence of the individual. Can thinking about oneself too much cause a person to lose sight of the bigger picture and somehow over-complicate things? Is just letting things be the better option?

Personally, I would say that I owe a large part of who I am to my ability to be self-critical. I know lot of people who don't do this and they seem perfectly happy though. I find this question hard to answer as I really can't imagine not being self-critical. I think that it falls into the category of Ignorance is Bliss. Would you prefer ignorance if it guaranteed happiness, or do you derive a deeper level of happiness from investigating things in greater detail? Personally the latter is my choice.

What do you think?

Tags: 2, Philosophy, life, question, unexamined

Views: 27

Replies to This Discussion

I have a strip I wrote and illustrated awhile back dealing with a person perception of reality after developing cap graws sydrome. The final words of his doctor were "The unexamined life is not worth living and the overexamined life is unlivable. What a beautiful night." An thats my basic take on the subject.

RSS

Latest Activity

Jay D replied to Leto Atreides II's discussion Ferguson Grand Jury Decision in the group The Great Debate
""And you are also mistaken if you think those rioting, are doing so because of Brown. He's an excuse, not a reason. " Might be, but this raises the question why they are looking for excuses to riot and furthermore how did they get in…"
52 minutes ago
Curtis replied to Leto Atreides II's discussion Ferguson Grand Jury Decision in the group The Great Debate
"Titus, I appreciate what you're saying and agree somewhat, I just don't think it's quite so cut and dry. Shooting an unarmed man/youth in "self-defence" simply because he might have been armed, speaks more of fear than…"
53 minutes ago
Curtis replied to Leto Atreides II's discussion Ferguson Grand Jury Decision in the group The Great Debate
"JB, I'm not familiar with US law, nor will I pretend to be...but what I perceive you to be saying is that; whether he was armed or not - regardless of the fact that the punishment (or "justice" as you labelled it) far outweighs the…"
1 hour ago
Sean O' replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"That is a thought I can appreciate and understand. You gave me a lot to digest, much more than the original post I responded to, and I enjoy that."
3 hours ago
Sean O' replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"Titus, I appreciate your response and will have to give it further considerations. Thanks you"
3 hours ago
Dark Mockery updated their profile
3 hours ago
Satanist Dan replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"I would rather trust the federal government, when under the firm hand of the populace, than to the state government of any affair. Especially in Education, where we lag behind numerous other nations, and have such ridiculous fiascoes such…"
3 hours ago
Sean O' replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"OK. And why is this bad and needing to be replaced? And how should it be replaced?"
3 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service