Out to Build Bridges

Information

Out to Build Bridges

This is a LGBTQ+ group.  All men are encouraged to join, including straight men.

However, unlike the already established AoM group "Gay and Bisexual Men", this group is wide open, no privacy settings enabled.  

The overall purpose of the group is to encourage conversations between the straight and non-straight communities.  This already happens in AoM, but it is scattered.  And it can't happen in the private "Gay and Bisexual Men" group.

Debate is expected, but this is for building up bridges not tearing down people.

Main rule: don't be a jerk.

Members: 53
Latest Activity: May 18

Discussion Forum

Sexual identity as a societal construct?

Started by Salt Dragon. Last reply by Milo Morris May 18. 4 Replies

I find this website interesting which basically states that sexual orientation is a social rather than a biological construct…Continue

I'm a new aromantic ace. Any questions?

Started by Phil Penten. Last reply by Phil Penten May 2. 3 Replies

Hey everyone! I'm a 23 year old (cis) man from the UK. I'm both asexual and aromantic, as I only realised a couple of months ago. I'm currently at uni studying education, but I want to go into…Continue

needing affection from men

Started by Michael J. K.. Last reply by Salt Dragon Apr 16. 19 Replies

I was married and divorced twice then I was not married for  8 years.  Now I am married for the last 17 months.  Sometimes I just need to be held or hugged from men.Continue

Gays Want ‘Tech Bros’ Out

Started by Milo Morris. Last reply by Salt Dragon Feb 5. 12 Replies

San Francisco Gays Want ‘Tech Bros’ Out of Their Neighborhoods by Jack Hadfield 3 Feb 2016 San Francisco, the gay capital of America, is…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Out to Build Bridges to add comments!

Comment by Shane on April 5, 2016 at 7:35pm
Congrats?
Comment by Michael J. K. on February 24, 2016 at 10:56pm

Amen to that Sir Edmund

Comment by Michael J. K. on February 8, 2016 at 12:26am

I am okay the way I am.

Comment by Sir on January 13, 2016 at 9:56am

Accepting as they are people we accept as they are, but not accepting people we don't accept, should be an easy enough task for all of us!

Comment by David R. on January 13, 2016 at 8:35am

I am getting so tired of guys trying to come up with weird reasons why some persons are not heterosexual.  Why can't we just accept people as they are?  (And in this group to be accepted I do not include pedophiles or persons who rape.  That is completely different from sexual orientation.)

Comment by Michael J. K. on November 2, 2015 at 11:32am

hugs

Comment by Michael J. K. on August 2, 2015 at 3:31am

hope all is well with everyone

hugs to everyone here

Comment by Milo Morris on June 28, 2015 at 10:03am

I'm glad to see that coming out to people is working out well for you so far.

Comment by Milo Morris on May 21, 2015 at 9:00am

Hey Michael. Lots going on in RL as the concert season draws to a close, and I'm nearing the end of my securities licensing.

Comment by Ian Wilson on May 21, 2015 at 8:41am

thanks Michael.  it has been too quiet here, but i've been so busy with work and life and all to try to stir up discussions.

 

Members (53)

 
 
 

Latest Activity

Jack Bauer replied to Braeden P.D.'s discussion Unpopular Opinions Thread
"I always thought Nicholson's Joker was overrated.  He wasn't playing the Joker, he was playing Jack Nicholson ... the exact same character he plays in everything, with make-up. JB"
4 minutes ago
Thomas Kime joined Jason M.'s group
Thumbnail

Concealed Carry Club

Every gentleman should be able to adequately protect himself and his family from ruffians’ intent on doing harm. This group welcomes anyone who takes pride in their second amendment right to keep and bear arms in a legally concealed manner.
59 minutes ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"We used to have much more effective caugh syrup for our children. http://antiquecannabisbook.com/chap8/Massengill.htm So they're not historically out of touch. Purists are out of touch with our modern reality however. A pure libertarian…"
1 hour ago
Larry replied to Max Z's discussion I want to die.. in the group Depression (And Suicide)
"Hello, Max!  Are you taking any medications?  I take an antidepressant.  I have, for a number of years.  I still can't go without it. I do well, with it.  "
2 hours ago
Sir replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"I didn't believe you, of course.  So I had to look it up. Now maybe I can convince my Libertarian Catholic friend that even if ideological purity beats effectiveness, he picked the wrong kind of purity."
3 hours ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Johnson got boo'd for suggesting blind people shouldn't drive and 5yo's shouldn't use heroin. The delegates were quite vocal about their dissatisfaction. I'm surprised he won the nomination."
3 hours ago
Sir replied to Lucas Stickan's discussion Virile Agitur
"Sit virile?  Virilite fac sit?"
4 hours ago
Sir replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"If "reality" means "winning an election," no, definitely not.  Capital-L Libertarians value purity over actually winning anything.  If they didn't, they'd be a faction in R or D."
4 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service