Information

Men of Science

Men of Science is a group for students, teachers, and admirers of science and exploration.

Members: 179
Latest Activity: Oct 29

Welcome to Men of Science


MEN OF SCIENCE
Anthropology | Evolution | Animal Ethology | Biology | Geology | Geography | Volcanology | Physics | Genetics | Cosmology | Archaeology | Oceanography | Ecology | Chemistry | Mathematics

We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology. - Carl Sagan


EXTERNAL LINKS OF INTEREST
American Anthropological Association
Dr. Kaku's Universe
Geology.com
The Leakey Foundation
The Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Not Exactly Rocket Science
PopSci
Public Library of Science
ScienceBlogs
Scientific American
Scientopia
Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History
Somatosphere: Science, Medicine, and Anthropology
Trends in Cognitive Sciences


OTHER GROUPS OF INTEREST ON AoM
AoM Astronomers
Ars Medica
Spaceflight Fanatics

Discussion Forum

What's your field

Started by Alex. Last reply by Kit Sep 17. 30 Replies

History of the term "scientist"

Started by Alan Liddell Sep 8. 0 Replies

Monkeys

Started by Richard. Last reply by Rick Shelton Apr 7. 3 Replies

Time: Is there really such a thing?

Started by StaggerLee. Last reply by Richard Mar 28. 22 Replies

A New State of Matter?

Started by Pale Horse. Last reply by Rick Shelton Feb 26. 2 Replies

Common Core

Started by Brown Fox. Last reply by Brown Fox Jan 21. 2 Replies

Science for Children

Started by Mike S.. Last reply by Liam Strain Nov 25, 2012. 23 Replies

Swedish Academy awards Cosmology

Started by Iosephus Lvcs Gonzalez. Last reply by Iosephus Lvcs Gonzalez Oct 16, 2011. 2 Replies

Coronal Mass Ejection and Earthquakes

Started by Dave Santuomo. Last reply by Dave Santuomo Mar 24, 2011. 27 Replies

TEDTalks : The amazing intelligence of crows - Joshua Klein

Started by Paul Lavin. Last reply by Pariah du jour Jan 10, 2011. 1 Reply

Would you go?

Started by Ian Wilson. Last reply by Daniel Gaston Oct 20, 2010. 1 Reply

Popular Science Magazine

Loading… Loading feed

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Men of Science to add comments!

Comment by Richard on May 19, 2014 at 3:02pm

Hey Liam,

I'm curious regarding what your "issues" are with Harris"-- can you elaborate?

Thanks

Comment by Liam Strain on March 28, 2014 at 10:06pm

Love Feynman. I have said, Mystery, awe, wonder, etc. Great. With you on that.

I have issues with Harris (I am familiar with him, I disagree with him on quite a few things). Sagan is great, though I still don't understand what spirituality means in this context. 

Thanks for the nat-geo link. Interesting stuff. 

Comment by Richard on March 28, 2014 at 6:31pm

“But I still don't know that that sense of wonder and awe, translates to anything that anyone would recognize as spirituality. That's an empty word at best, especially once divorced from supernatural or metaphysical constructs. “

 

 Hey Liam,

Interestingly, I just finished reading Carl Sagan’s The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark.  Here’s a quote from the book: “Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.”

 

I’m also an ardent fan of Sam Harris (if you’re not familiar with the man I suspect you’ll enjoy his writing and especially his debates.)  Here’s an article he posted on his website titled “In Defense of Spiritual”.  Although he’s an atheist, he’s currently writing a book on spirituality: http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/a-plea-for-spirituality

 

 You might also get a kick out of some of his debates: http://www.samharris.org/debates

 

While this Feynman video titled “The Inconceivable Nature of Nature doesn’t get directly into the spiritual issue it’s a great example of the mystery and awe that Science can inspire. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AU8PId_6xec

“Daniel - yes, I should have clarified sub-species. But it was a more branch off - dead-end, from what I understand. We share a common ancestor, but are not directly from their line.” 

 

It appears that Neanderthals weren’t a dead-end after all.  I think that’s what Daniel was alluding to: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-...

 

 Lastly, my wife hates the term and says I’m wrong-headed when I use it.  So, in pursuit of marital accord I concede you are right-- There!  At any rate, I’m not looking to get into a debate on semantics.  I was simply trying to express (perhaps less than clearly) my great and ever increasing awe at this strange and mysterious universe we live in.

Comment by Kevin on March 28, 2014 at 5:07pm

"I propose that individually, the odds of that are so great as to be impossible."

It is a mistake to determine the odds of an event happening post hoc, and from that making any kind of statement about how extremely unlikely it is that the event occurred a priori.  There are 8*1067 different ways to arrange a deck of 52 cards.  That is a truly GIGANTIC number!  In contrast, the universe has only existed for about .  If you started shuffling cards, once per second, from the moment of the big bang to the present, you would still need to shuffle cards for billions and billions of years for every possible arrangement to come up.  The odds against any one particular ordering of cards occurring is so incredibly small that one might claim it to be virtually impossible.  And yet, ever single time you shuffle a deck of cards, the cards end up in an order that had only a 1 in 8*1067 chance of occurring.  When you're dealing with really big numbers and places as big and as old as the universe "Everything not forbidden is compulsory."   

Comment by Liam Strain on March 28, 2014 at 4:19pm

Yes, I have a sense of wonder/awe at the immensity, etc. The probability of me isn't the question - it's the development of conscious (self-aware) life, which I think is not as rare. 

But I still don't know that that sense of wonder and awe, translates to anything that anyone would recognize as spirituality. That's an empty word at best, especially once divorced from supernatural or metaphysical constructs. 

Daniel - yes, I should have clarified sub-species. But it was a more branch off - dead-end, from what I understand. We share a common ancestor, but are not directly from their line. 

Comment by Richard on March 27, 2014 at 5:43pm

But don’t you find wonder in the very idea that in the vastness of the universe and of the uncountable life forms that have lived on this planet, you and I are able to discuss such issues?  What is the probability of You?  Under any evaluation, it must be an incredibly rare thing

Comment by Satanist Dan on March 27, 2014 at 5:32pm

The Neanderthals were integrated with all Non-African stock, eg, see my forehead. They weren't a different species, they were a subspecies, but so were Homo Sapiens Idatu which most likely was integrated into the East-Northeast Africans stock just like the Nearanderthal was taken into the other aspects of Humanity. 

Comment by Liam Strain on March 27, 2014 at 5:28pm

I should clarify - any large scale, natural process driven, thing (e.g. evolution leading to a conscious life form). 

To say that the conditions, and the amount of time required could never happen elsewhere... we don't even know that it hasn't happened here before (the neanderthal are a different species that we are not in direct line of descent from - how far back does "consciousness" happen?  

Given the immense size of the universe (and the possibility that it is one of an infinite number of other universes, etc.) - I am not comfortable saying that conscious life is unique. Not even on this planet. 

Comment by Liam Strain on March 27, 2014 at 5:22pm

I guess, my problem is that the word "spiritual" doesn't really mean much. 

Comment by Richard on March 27, 2014 at 5:21pm

The scale of the universe makes the idea that anything which could happen even just once (that we know of), being totally unique, absurd. 

 

But aren't you unique?

 

Members (179)

 
 
 

Latest Activity

Carl Monster commented on Rusty Rogers's photo
Thumbnail

Week27

"So I'm right, if people are telling you you should respond to weight training quite well. You have a good framework to work with. "
1 minute ago
Regular Joe replied to Hannah Carroll's discussion Whiskey Trouble
"I never thought I'd be a whiskey drinker but someone made me try Laphoaig and I was like whoah.  "
3 minutes ago
N. Vest replied to Leto Atreides II's discussion Ferguson Grand Jury Decision in the group The Great Debate
8 minutes ago
Rusty Rogers commented on Rusty Rogers's photo
Thumbnail

Week27

"Hate my giant breasts the size of Baltimore. :-) Really hoping they go away as I train."
10 minutes ago
Rusty Rogers commented on Rusty Rogers's photo
Thumbnail

Week27

"What's interesting is that I was rather overweight as a kid. And obesity runs rampant in my family."
11 minutes ago
Rick Shelton commented on Rusty Rogers's photo
Thumbnail

Week27

"Rusty, He means Meso-morph it's a body type.   "The extreme mesomorph has a square, massive head; broad, muscular chest and shoulders; a large heart; heavily muscled arms and legs; and minimal body fat. He tends to…"
12 minutes ago
Todd Heavner commented on Rusty Rogers's photo
Thumbnail

Week27

"Mesomorph.  naturally lean, muscular, strong"
13 minutes ago
Gary J commented on Andrew's group Men with Beards
"Rusty,  If you haven't already, you should check out beards.org for tips on proper shaping of your beard.  Lots of pics there."
13 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service