hello all

the title "is it necessary? comes from a discussion i had with a couple of friends whilst perusing an antique mall. on this trip we saw countless old family photos being sold by people in their areas. it went a bit like this...

(apparently an antique mall will designate an airea for some one to display their stuff and when some one buys something from a persons area that  person gets money and the mall takes a percentage)

any way i made a comment as to how sad it was that people are not valuing their own family history and heritages any more, how its so cheaply for sale. to which both friends reply... "why not, its not like they knew each other anyway"?

i just was thinking of what could have prompted them to reply the same way this concept makes no sense to me at all, what do you all think?

Views: 43

Replies to This Discussion

We've been sold the lie that a white-washed "American" identity is all that we should value. It's ideals left-over from centuries of colonialist values that, in more modern times, we can trace back to our British roots, but which ultimately reach back millennia to the era of Pax Romana. It's arrogant and foolish values ignorantly and unknowingly adopted. Don't be too hard on your friends. Most people I know have that same attitude.

It is only when we dare to be different and step back to look at the broader picture (or have the good fortune to be brought up in a rare household that instills this) that we begin to desire to identify what makes us who we are and can see that so many beyond ourselves contribute to this.

So, give your friends time and lead by example. They may eventually begin to think through it for themselves and catch the desire.
ya i just don't agree with allot of this popular idealistic "individualism" identity... no wonder so many people feel disjointed from family, community, and their histories these days.

also please excuse my spelling above it was something that kept me up a bit late lol

I'm right there with you Eric. I think it is sad too. I understand that there will be a certain percentage of old family photos that will end up sold due to the family line dying out, but I think too many just don't value their past.  I don't think there is anything arrogant or foolish about valuing your family history.

It's sad to sell family photos even from the individualistic American perspective.  Someday someone's going to have a child that looks just like one of those ancestors, but won't have a copy left as a conversation piece. 

I'm more curious about respecting the living than the dead, though.  My son looks a lot like his mother's cousin whom I've never met.  We're divorced and not on good terms and she hasn't seen her cousin in probably 40 years.  Why stop at dissing the dead when you can dis living relatives too?  

My philosophy is to know thyself, including family and history, but not to be limited to or defined by it.  My ex on the other hand, defines relationships and priorities by convenience and doesn't have contact with any of her bridesmaids from when we married 18 years ago.  I tell my sons that it's not a matter of good or bad, they are just different.  

RSS

Latest Activity

Liam Strain replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"Do you really think when he said "I will build a great, great wall on our southern border. And I will have Mexico pay for that wall."That people understood that to be - "I'll build a wall only in a few places on the border, and…"
19 minutes ago
Suburban Sentinel replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"If the silver market manipulation finally ends, the price of silver could skyrocket. As Mexico has a huge reserve of the metal in the ground, Mexico could be a very wealthy country overnight. They might build the wall to keep us out."
2 hours ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"Trump never claimed it would be a coast to coast wall, nor that Mexico would write a check up front."
6 hours ago
Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"It should be easy enough for everyone to claim to be right about this one. Wall gets partially built, somewhere between a few feet and 1500 miles or such.  People who didn't want a wall claim victory because it's not all the way from…"
7 hours ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
""If" a wall gets built. We'll be the ones to pay for it. it's not gonna get built though. So it's really a non issue."
7 hours ago
Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
9 hours ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"Prototypes going up in June."
9 hours ago
Pale Horse added a discussion to the group The Great Debate
Thumbnail

Another Brick in the Wall

A thread to discuss anything related to the building and/or concept of a southern US border wall. I'll start:Cruz proposes using funds from El Chapo and other drug money. I still want Mexico to pony up some of the money, but I do like this plan, at face value. See More
9 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service