I've researched one line (dad's grandmother) back to the 1700's, with very good accuracy, there's just tons of things on them. However, I'm stuck on finding a single iota of info past dad's great-grandfather. The story goes, Jim McNeal came from an extremely wealthy family, millionaires in the 19th century. He too had enough to buy several large buildings, land, the nicest horses, an early automobile, all kinds of things.

He ran off on horseback and eloped with a woman named Nancy Ann Ausburn. His father chased after them, on his own personal train. The equivalent of a private jet today.

No idea what happened in detail (might have been quite a story in itself), but he ended up disowning Jim, no longer even acknowledged he had ever had a son at all. This likely is why Jim initially (1900 census) listed his birthplace as Tennessee, but in 1910, he had Alabama listed, the same place as his wife was actually born.

Could this disowning be why I can find nothing on Jim's parents? Perhaps all records were burned? I do know that Jim was born in October 1862, and died of a stroke in 1918. I also have personally visited his and Nancy's grave, and have pictures of that, as well as a picture of Jim himself.

Very manly looking guy, I'd have loved to sit and talk with him. I may never find any more info beyond him, but I will sure as hell try. Any tips? I use ancestry.com, full paid subscription.

Views: 52

Replies to This Discussion

Disownining the 1800s was serious.  Maybe less so outside of old blood lines, especially in the states, but it was very serious. Given the era, and the man's wealth, it would not surprise me if legal records were changed to reflect that James was no longer his sire's son.  So until you have the sire's name, I doubt ancestry.com will be much help. 

You're far from out of luck, however!  You have alot of great clues you can use.

You know alot of facts about his birth family / sire.

* Millionaires during 1800s

*Owned a personal train

*owned an *early* automobile?

*Surname: McNeal 

 

Not many millionaires in the 1800s US, fewer still that owned trains.  And possibly named McNeal. :P

Historical automobile and train enthusiasts are probably your best lead to follow next.  See if you can find lists of private train owners (perhaps from the Tenn/Alabama area?).  You can try the same tactic with the car, but unless you know which car it was, you might not have much luck.  Still, not many people could have owned an automobile in the 1800s. 

 

Good luck!

I suspect you could read about your McNeal family history in the library, but their name likely is not McNeal.  It was easy to change your identity back then without  computers disciplined record keeping.  Without knowing the family secrets it would be hard to find your great grandfather's true identity.  I'd focus on the gifts and values he prioritized in becoming Jim McNeal vs. the ones he left behind and caused him much heartache.  

RSS

Latest Activity

Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion Our Current Western Zeitgeist in the group The Great Debate
"You're wording poorly then. Reality cannot have a bias by virtue of being reality. Humanity may have a liberal bias, however. That's an impossible challenge. Name a liberal counter-revolution."
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Our Current Western Zeitgeist in the group The Great Debate
"How so? Name a right wing revolution."
1 hour ago
Pale Horse replied to Liam Strain's discussion June 27, 2017 - Chat not functioning
2 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to Liam Strain's discussion June 27, 2017 - Chat not functioning
2 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Liam Strain's discussion June 27, 2017 - Chat not functioning
"I second this. Could I speak to a manager please?"
2 hours ago
John Muir replied to Liam Strain's discussion June 27, 2017 - Chat not functioning
"Well, that's just not acceptable, Liam."
2 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion Our Current Western Zeitgeist in the group The Great Debate
"Ah, I see what you mean now. Yeah, sometimes I wonder why countries outside the US have such an authoritarian view of free speech."
2 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to Pale Horse's discussion Our Current Western Zeitgeist in the group The Great Debate
"I say murky not because I don't agree with you - but because what is considered hate speech is so widely variable by each country and its own sensibilities. In the US I don't think any of those will fly - other countries have different…"
2 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service