I think that all religions have both positive and negative attributes. I'd like to focus on the positive attributes, that is, those tenets that followers of each faith don't just preach, but actually practice, to the betterment of all. So I've made a list of what I think to be the best ideals of differing faiths. Imagine if they could all be brought together.

DISCLAIMER: If your religion is not included, I didn't know enough about it, it's not that I didn't deem it positive... lol Also, if you can think of others that I missed, please add them.

In no discernible order:


Catholicism - importance of education
Judaism - support for the family and community
Quakers - importance of self-reliance
Islam - oneness of faith, completely united
Hinduism - value of adherence to ritual
Baptist - desire to share the message with others
Mormonism - promotion of healthy lifestyle tenets
Methodist - everyone is welcome to be in the group
Buddhist - everything in moderation, the middle path
Rastafarianism - equality for all
Unitarian - all ideas/beliefs are equally considered
Lutheran - necessity of accountability
Anglican - love for country
Wicca - love for nature
Amish - self-sustainability
Humanist - faith in your fellow man

What do you guys think?

Views: 340

Replies to This Discussion

I think it's a noble and valid point made well - religions have promoted strong positive attributes amongst their followers. A very simple example is the Muslim faiths insistence that followers clean their face and hands every time they pray. The affect this simple practice had on Medieval health cannot be underestimated. Millions died of the Black Death in Europe - 50-80% of the population of Europe - as they did in the Middle East; however the percentage of the populace that died was far lower in Muslim countries - nearer 30%.

Yet all of the points raised above, whilst totally worthwhile, are not exclusive to these beliefs nor religious believers: They are attributes treasured by many people because they represent admirable traits in all humans. Their whole definition and practice are human traits, not religious ones.

For me, religions - and many other collective belief systems - work by making people do things that don't come naturally, like persecution, Crusades, suicide bombings, rather than actions that must, by the very nature that we are all alive today, be inherent in humans no matter what their beliefs; family, community, health, education, self-sustainability.

Religious apologists would say that without their faith, people are naturally selfish, lawless and greedy - and in some individuals they may be right. But if you look at any list of philanthropists, charitable donors or individuals acting selflessly, it is not an exclusively religious group. Therefore, the claim that religions are the sole preserve of a generosity of spirit and social support structure for the disadvantaged is patently untrue.

As a humanist, I would aim for possessing all of the attributes above in some way (perhaps not the attributes for Islam, Unitarian or Anglican) as these define the best features of precisely what group we all belong to - homo sapiens.
"Religious apologists would say that without their faith, people are naturally selfish, lawless and greedy - and in some individuals they may be right. But if you look at any list of philanthropists, charitable donors or individuals acting selflessly, it is not an exclusively religious group. Therefore, the claim that religions are the sole preserve of a generosity of spirit and social support structure for the disadvantaged is patently untrue."

Brilliant! Well said!
I would disagree about Catholicism - importance of education. Historically, the Church has not wanted lay people to be educated. In addition to the problems they have had with science.
Islam - oneness of faith, completely united

Although it may appear that Islam is a united religion from an American vantage point, in reality there are nearly as many fragmented groups in the Islamic religion as there are the other major world religions.

RSS

Latest Activity

Sir joined Damaged Boy's group
Thumbnail

Male Survivors

Men who have survived childhood abuse
10 minutes ago
Sir replied to Max Z's discussion More traumatic by the family than the incident in the group Male Survivors
"You so very much need to hear the opposite messages. You are worthy.  You are strong.  You are self-aware (based on your self-revelation here).  You are smart (based on your school focus). You are so worthwhile. I hope you can find…"
10 minutes ago
Tarquin Anstruther replied to O'Neal's discussion Addressing Bad Hygiene?
"Me too, and that doesn't often happen!"
19 minutes ago
Jon Z replied to O'Neal's discussion Addressing Bad Hygiene?
"This thread leaves me speechless."
21 minutes ago
Carl Monster commented on Sean O''s blog post Completed
"Big fan of 5/3/1, so I'll be checking out that regimen. Congrats on your new family member; I imagine he'll have a great father. Wow, what news. Puts what happens here in perspective."
30 minutes ago
george morgan replied to O'Neal's discussion Addressing Bad Hygiene?
"Yuck Man!  No one should have to put up with that kind of primitive lack of hygiene! You gotta say something...it's already bothering you and hurting your relationship.  It's bound also to be affecting your sexual relations with…"
32 minutes ago
David R. replied to Max Z's discussion More traumatic by the family than the incident in the group Male Survivors
"Oh, Max -- your story brought tears to my eyes.  There is special trauma when a guy is sexually abused by a girl/woman (because many persons will say he is "lucky" since it was a female).  But then to have that video made and…"
1 hour ago
Penelope replied to Mike Verbickas's discussion Upward Mobility
"That's a story from Plato and Caesar."
6 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service