Putting the Man in Humanist

Information

Putting the Man in Humanist

Atheist, Agnostic, Bright and Humanist men who don't rely on the supernatural to guide them but their own sense of morality, duty and fair play.

Members: 105
Latest Activity: Sep 7, 2014

Discussion Forum

Is religion manly?

Started by Mark Edward Wilson. Last reply by Allen Thomas Sep 21, 2012. 43 Replies

Science and Morality

Started by Richard Aug 12, 2012. 0 Replies

Leaving the Church

Started by None. Last reply by Jeff Owen Feb 27, 2011. 6 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Putting the Man in Humanist to add comments!

Comment by Liam Strain on April 11, 2011 at 11:45am

AC Grayling creates a secular bible:

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/11/leading-atheist-publishes-...

 

What if the book that billions have turned to for ethical guidance wasn’t tied to commandments from God or any one particular tradition but instead included the writings of Aristotle, the reflections of Confucius, the poetry of Baudelaire? What would that book look like, and what would it mean?

 

Interesting

Comment by Jens Rasmussen on January 26, 2011 at 12:11pm

Bryan and Clint - I don't think you need to worry about offending folks here - simply by your presence and making yourselves known...  Us non-believers certainly know what that feels like and I hope are loath to return that type of treatment.

Almost all of Christ's teachings are very in line with Humanist values - so we can work together to bring about that kind of world (whether we believe he was the son of a triune god or not).

Wish there were more like you guys.

“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”Mahatma Gandhi

Comment by Bryan Lee Sammis on January 26, 2011 at 11:30am

Here's the IMDB link for Jason and the Argonauts

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057197/

Comment by Clint Connolly on January 26, 2011 at 11:19am
No I've not see any Jason and the Argonouts - other than what I now forget from college.
Comment by Clint Connolly on January 26, 2011 at 11:14am

Well, it's funny, I first discovered the seeming oxymoronic term "Christian Humanist" when I heard it applied to Thomas More who I liked.  I looked it up AND FOUND THAT ALL OF MY FAVORITE AUTHORS ARE CONSIDERED CHRISTIAN HUMANISTS

 

Even GK Chesterton!  So I guess I have no doubt, I am a Christian Humanist.  But it is not a popular term with conservative Christians.  I'm sick of what is and isn't popular - I have never fit cleanly into one group, so I've sort of embraced sticking out like a sore thumb. 

 

At one point I said on AoM "For those of you who haven't  yet had the privilege of being offended by me yet..." 

 

I'm not trying to be in your face exactly, but if offending everyone is inevitable, hey I may as well learn to love it.

Comment by Bryan Lee Sammis on January 26, 2011 at 11:08am

I agree.  I'm tired of the"you must either be a christian or a humanist-You cannot be both'' attitude that organized religon has been pushing down people's throats!

 

Have you ever seen the original "Jason and the Argonouts"?

I have Jason's view about god(s)

Comment by Clint Connolly on January 26, 2011 at 10:24am

Hey, I hope I'm not unwelcome here.  I am a conservative Christian, but I've been noticing lately how conservative Christianity seems to be the antithesis of humanism - however, like all extremes, they meet at the other end of the circle.

 

I find that there is a ton of humanist ideas in Christianity.  And I see the strength of humanism - it is often destroyed in the Church and in the Secular world - much to man's detriment.  

 

My exemplar of the meeting of secular humanism and conservative Christianity - STEINBECK.

Comment by Bryan Lee Sammis on January 26, 2011 at 9:56am
I hope you don't mind my being here. But alas, My motivation for being a part of this group is all those "religious zealots", IN PUBLIC, that are so hell bent on saving souls that do not wish to be saved.  Ever ecounter these people?  They drive me mad
Comment by Kasper on January 12, 2010 at 5:54pm
Howdy'... Glad to join you fellas. I think I'd call myself healthily agnostic. It's tough to be a humanist when there are so many stupid people in the world, but we can change that, right? One step at a time...
Comment by John M. Dolph on December 20, 2009 at 7:20pm
Hi Alexander,

Nice to see someone else at this group. Gentlemen Atheists seems to get a bit more traffic though.
 

Members (104)

 
 
 

Latest Activity

Native Son replied to Joshua's discussion Democratic presidential nomination in the group The Great Debate
"Bernie makes some noise.  But whoever runs simply must overcome the combination of MSM love and donor cash attaching itself to the name Clinton."
33 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Dallas, if Jesus Christ descended from the heavens and told you it was a baby, you wouldn't believe it. Your arguments are degenerating into something between insanity and an utter lack of cognitive, linear logic. Your standing in the shower…"
35 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"You're killing your own argument Dallas. Just because you say it, doesn't make it so. You just offered why you are wrong."
45 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"I am flat out telling you, for those who are on the other side of the argument, it has everything to do with all of it. Just because you, and Jack and anyone else say no, doesn't make it so."
49 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"False pretense. The support of children in need does not require government bureaucracy. That is a comically dumb notion."
56 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"In Colorado they have been running a program on free birth control for the past 6 years.  The numbers on this are quite eye opening in my opinion. A quote: Between 2009 and 2015, "teen births dropped 40 percent, abortions fell 35…"
58 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"To answer your unbelievably douche question directly, I'm a thousand times more comfortable providing for a child than murdering it. Basically the opposite of liberalism which operates on the idea that a less than ideal start to life…"
59 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Cite it please. At best, I have found where science has given four unique definitions of life."
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service