Gentleman Conservatives

Information

Gentleman Conservatives

A meeting place for gentlemen who believe in Conservative values and principles.

Members: 136
Latest Activity: Feb 25

Discussion Forum

Conservative or not??

Started by Johnnie Bradley. Last reply by Luis Rivas Aug 13, 2013. 19 Replies

Ok gentlemen.  Here is my problem.  Why do we seem to support a non conservative, like Romney, when we have a good proven conservative like Newt or John Huntsman?  Are we so scared of the left that…Continue

Time For A New Party?

Started by Khalid El-Talabani. Last reply by KL15 Jun 1, 2013. 4 Replies

It is time to shed the “I’m a Conservative-Republican or Conservative-Democrat” label because it just positions the conservative within a sub-group of the party. A conservative hyphenated Republican…Continue

This is Very Presidential

Started by Mike. Last reply by Tim Boland Jan 12, 2012. 2 Replies

Stay classy, Mr. PresidentYou, too, can purchase this fine article of clothing at…Continue

2012 Conservative Presidential Candidates

Started by David Arbogast May 23, 2011. 0 Replies

Conservative Gentlemen! I live in Iowa which is now seeing its periodic influx of Presidential candidates of all stripes.  The next big event will be the iowa Straw Poll in Ames, Iowa, to which I…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Gentleman Conservatives to add comments!

Comment by Rick Stevens on August 19, 2012 at 3:28pm

Welcome Shane!

Comment by Kevin Collier on August 19, 2012 at 2:40pm

Welcome Shane!

Comment by Shane San on August 19, 2012 at 9:33am

I'm a 23 year-old conservative, looking forward to learning from you all.

Comment by Titus Techera on March 7, 2012 at 3:41pm

What? No. It's a dog-eat-dog world in speeches!

Comment by Titus Techera on March 7, 2012 at 3:36pm

What liberals mean is that it's alright for however many liberals to say horrible things about women because those liberals are not as powerful as Mr. Limbaugh. Pettiness is exculpatory, of course, & moralizing liberals can go on enjoying the horrible things other liberals, who are plainly immoral, say about conservative women.

That's liberals fighting the powerful, just like when Mr. Clinton was accused of treating several women in a humiliating manner. Liberals as one rallied to the cause of the women then & were undaunted by the power of the office of the president or the partisan inclination to defend one of their own. They stood for the principles of feminism that day & fought against the objectification of women & the patriarchal abuse of power...

It's just like the day Mr. Obama used the bully pulpit to bully FOX News. Liberals in the media immediately recoiled, faced with this 'chilling' of the free press & did not in any way suggest may FOX should be destroyed. They stood for principle against partisanship, arguing no doubt that if Mr. Obama was worth anything they had said he was, he would be properly chastised & would learn that the free press is very necessary to a democracy. & never mind that a great majority of journalists vote / donate Democrat.

Comment by Titus Techera on March 7, 2012 at 12:19pm

Well, I'll help you flex that morality muscle you're limping all over the room.

The objection Mr. Limbaugh presented in the manner of ridicule mostly turned on calling the woman a slut, her kind of life prostitution, & climaxed with a request that she post the putative sex tapes for people to see.

This amounts to a complaint that the woman is immoral. Maybe unless the word is used, it just doesn't trigger in your brain. But at least pay attention to the mention of shame in many of the feminist attacks on Mr. Limbaugh: even they got it, the matter is morality, because shame is a matter of morality. The feminists & Mr. Limbaugh disagree on what is good morality, but agree that a serious question of morality deals with the relation between sex & shame in public discourse.

Comment by OHK on March 7, 2012 at 12:13pm

Where does morality fit into this? I don't recall me, Fluke, nor Limbaugh mentioning it.

Comment by Titus Techera on March 7, 2012 at 1:48am

I don't mean to teach you a sense of humor. If you cannot see why presenting the need for contraception as high-principled morality is a travesty, you probably don't understand morality anyway. Suffice it to say that morality as properly & commonly understood requires self-sacrifice, not selfishness. It requires understanding & fulfilling duties, not making claims upon claims to get more things. It concerns what one does for others, not what one expects others to do for oneself...

As for Mr. Limbaugh, his written apology - I have not heard his apologies on air - gives this self-presentation: I illustrate the absurd with absurdity. - Not to say he does not take politics dead seriously, but his manner is comic. It is quite clear that in this case he was ridiculing the sanctimony of a gender activist at one of the nation's elite schools asking the many to pay for her contraception, or else they're unjust.

Mr. Limbaugh does not pretend it's gentlemanly of him to discuss politic in the way he does. That would be silly. Gentlemen are hidebound by politeness & could not call a spade a spade...

Comment by OHK on March 6, 2012 at 6:52pm

Gentlemen, unlike ladies, are not only allowed, but expected to lose their gentle habits on occasion.


If you believe calling a woman a slut and prostitute on national radio is acceptable and expected venting that could still be called gentlemanly, then we have very different definitions of what it means to be a gentleman, and IMO your definition is laughable and meaningless, and not in anyway based on accepted respected manners.


The idea of a young woman going up before Congress saying that young women in college need the contraception for free, because it can be quite costly..., is ungodly.

Why?

Comment by Kevin Collier on March 6, 2012 at 8:28am

Okay, let the FATHERS and MOTHERS start paying for the offspring! Two people brought the child into the world, let them pay for them. Stop taking money from my family to pay for your "choice".

 

Members (136)

 
 
 

Latest Activity

Pelagius replied to Chu Kim's discussion Man Crushes and the Difference between being Homo
"The only absolute is that there is no absolute. Sexuality is a spectrum, not a revolution, of human desire.  You're not gay, but - you can be bisexual, or "Hetrosexual with homosexual tendencies." And there is nothing wrong with…"
5 minutes ago
Chu Kim posted a discussion

Man Crushes and the Difference between being Homo

Yeah. I was wondering about this. I shall freely admit on this forum that I have had some let's say unusual feelings occasionally towards other men. I know for a fact that I am a 100% bona fide, straight as a heterosexual arrow kind of guy. And yet...sometimes I get these feelings. I would almost describe them as…See More
14 minutes ago
Will replied to whiskyjack's discussion Did anyone else get a "group email" from Gnostic Bishop? in the group Christian Men
"Can probably get more by study, but this is what I got so far that make a coherent whole (John 9's an outlier): Rom 8:29-30 For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the…"
1 hour ago
Karl Helweg replied to Jack Neulist's discussion Finding the "Old Ones": Who really settled North America first? in the group History Buffs
1 hour ago
Will replied to John Muir's discussion The End of Quantitative Easing As We Know It in the group The Great Debate
"Something's not right:  if BLS shows labor participation up, why did they say "The civilian labor force participation rate, at 62.8 percent, changed little in February and has remained within a narrow range of 62.7 to 62.9 percent…"
1 hour ago
Pelagius replied to John Muir's discussion The End of Quantitative Easing As We Know It in the group The Great Debate
"Order beats chaos."
1 hour ago
John Muir replied to John Muir's discussion The End of Quantitative Easing As We Know It in the group The Great Debate
"4 months later, and the soundness of the fed's monetary policy and Obama's tax and spending programs seems to me to be written more indelibly than ever. Today's non-farm employment report from the BLS shows labor participation…"
1 hour ago
Kit replied to Ramona the Pest's discussion How Can I Entice a Reluctant Camper?
"He sounds like me, and you sound like my ex. It will be fun! You won't hate it, dont knock it till you've tried it. I knew i'd hate it but remained open minded, maybe i was wrong? I hated every second of it. Theres a reason that…"
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service