I have been dragging my feet for a ver long time.  I attended a Master Mason in one day event and went through all the degrees.  I am a part of a lodge in Salt Lake City but moved to another town.  After the MM in one day event I was instructed to go to the lodge in my new town and have them pass me off.  I attended lodge once and was set up with some gentleman to study in order to pass it off.  I was then promoted at work and got very busy and was unable to got back to the lodge.

 It has been about a year since then and I really want to get back into it but I don't know if I should just show up to lodge?  

I do pay dues, is it okay for me just to start showing up to the meetings even though I am not officially apart of this lodge down here?

Views: 159

Replies to This Discussion

Brother Monson,
I'm going to make some assumptions: you were initiated, passed, and raised in a "regular" lodge; have a valid dues card; aren't suspended or expelled. If my assumptions are correct then you would be good to go. I would suggest going to the lodge on a practice and education night so you can get a quick refresher. I would say you would be VERY welcomed and any questions you have would be gladly answered.
Bro. Beyer
seanpbeyer@faithlodge756.org

I don't have dues card but at the end of the event I was required to pay the dues for 2012.  As far as passed goes, I think I need to pass off some memorization and grips, etc. to be official.  I guess the fact I don't know any of the masons in this town makes things more awkward for me.  I know if I was in Salt Lake still this would have been done a long while ago.

I attended a Festival style for the York Rite, and while I am grateful to be allowed into the Chapter/Council/Commandery, I do feel the loss that I am not as proficient in the work as I am with the first 3 degrees.

Having said that, my 2 Blue Lodges would definitely welcome you regardless if you were current or not. if you weren't, we would help you get current and facilitate your move from your home lodge.

RSS

Latest Activity

Portnoy replied to Pale Horse's discussion They Who Shall Not Be Named in the group The Great Debate
"Reading comprehension fail on my part with the Treyvon, my apologies. I wanted to recognize this on its own."
12 minutes ago
Vendetta replied to Pale Horse's discussion They Who Shall Not Be Named in the group The Great Debate
"The beer summit it definitely one, where he said that "the police acted stupidly" without knowing any of the details, which when they emerged revealed that the police were notified of two people breaking into a house (Gates and his…"
29 minutes ago
Shane replied to Braeden's discussion Trump's Afghanistan Declaration in the group The Great Debate
"I'm not trolling. I just don't think you're serious."
55 minutes ago
Portnoy replied to Pale Horse's discussion They Who Shall Not Be Named in the group The Great Debate
"I would appreciate one as well. I'm thinking it will revolve around the "beer summit" or when he said that Treyvon could have been his kid."
1 hour ago
Portnoy replied to Braeden's discussion Trump's Afghanistan Declaration in the group The Great Debate
"Not serious? Troll elsewhere, good bye."
1 hour ago
derick bean posted a status
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion They Who Shall Not Be Named in the group The Great Debate
"Kids"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Braeden's discussion Trump's Afghanistan Declaration in the group The Great Debate
"I was quoting you. If I'd known you weren't serious I wouldn't have read it, and you could have saved the time and not written it."
1 hour ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service