I really didn't dig this flick. Going in I knew it was going to be a tongue in cheek, inaccurate, revisionist, black comedy but I still couldn't suspend my disbelief enough to get into it. Aldo Raine was an amusing and interesting character as was Hans Landa but not enough time was focused on those two or the rest of the Basterds. You can tell which characters Tarantino plans on killing because they are usually built up and fleshed out pretty well. Casting Mike Myers is a good way to jar someone out of a movie and into thinking that they stepped into some Austion Powers warp.

Possible Spoiler
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I did like how Donowitz and Ulmer went all "agents of the apocalypse" at the end. They didn't even question what was going on around them. Also little man Utivich being such a stoic nonplussed yes man to Aldo at the end.

Views: 30

Replies to This Discussion

I would probably rank this somewhere between Resevior Dogs and Pulp Fiction with Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill being the best movies Quentin's directed so far.
I'm a big fan of war movies but not of Tarentino, so I will pass on this one.
This is very good Tarentino. I rank Reservoir Dogs as his best by far, and there have been some stinkers (Jackie Brown comes to mind). I didn't expect the movie to be so hilarious. It's like some fantasy/dream of Aldo Raine, the bumpkin who put the words "Inglourious Basterds" on his gun.
I describe this movie to my friends as 100% historically accurate lol.
I didn't like it. The segments involving the Basterds were great, but I wish he had fleshed them all out individually like he did for Stiglitz. The first scene was interesting and intense, but every other dialogue-driven scene felt drawn out and never seemed to go anywhere.

The side-story with the Jewish girl put me to sleep. I just didn't care.

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Shane's discussion Cup Holders
"Yeah.  I can only find almost what I'm looking for.  Found another style, but it's too shallow.  "
2 hours ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
""Touching in an unbroken sequence" does not mean or imply a solid span. You interpolated that on your own. Especially since he's said since the beginning there were natural (or other) barriers which needed no wall, and some areas a…"
2 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"Touching in an unbroken sequence.And really? You are going to hinge your defense of his inability to craft unambiguous EOs, and general abuse of clear communication and language use on "or other?"Why do you talk to me?"
3 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Shane's discussion Cup Holders
"Well you're the one who can't operate google."
3 hours ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Cup Holders
"This shouldn't be a difficult thing."
3 hours ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"I'm pretty sure you're the one who doesn't know what "contiguous" means. You're also ignoring the "or other" part. *shrug*"
3 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Shane's discussion Cup Holders
"I still think you should go to some kind of furniture store and ask around. In this case you'll get better results than from googling."
3 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"If he's defining words differently than what they mean, then it's a different problem, but it's not mine. "
4 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service