I'm thoroughly enjoying reading Radical, by David Platt.  It for me has been my favorite kinds of books - the kind that changes my attitude towards the subject it addresses, which in this case is evangelism.

     The author asserts seven truths I'd be delighted for anyone to join in discussing. They are:

  • All people have knowledge of God

  • All people reject God

  • All people are guilty before God

  • All people are condemned for rejecting God

  • God has made a way of Salvation for the lost.

  • People cannot come to God apart from faith in Christ

  • Christ commands the church to make the gospel known to all peoples

     Obviously, these truths are milestones that if a person agrees with, pass through salvation and into evangelism.

      This conversation would probably be more appropriate for the Apologetics group, but frankly there's not much traffic there. I'd be particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who disagree with one of the truths..... Atheists, Agnostics, and people of all religious stripes are welcome to comment, I only ask that the conversation be respectful.

    

     

Views: 216

Replies to This Discussion

All people have knowledge of God

 

Biblically false.

 

All people reject God

 

Objectively false.

 

All people are guilty before God

 

Christian concept, not inherent to the overall biblical theology.

 

All people are condemned for rejecting God

 

Christian concept, not inherent to the overall biblical theology.

 

God has made a way of Salvation for the lost.

 

Define "Lost".  Define "Salvation".  Define "Way".

People cannot come to God apart from faith in Christ

 

Biblically false.

 

Christ commands the church to make the gospel known to all peoples

 

Yes, but; no conversion is required for salvation.

Before I can reply, I would have to know what your definition of the word Bible is.....

Torah?

OT?

OT/NT?

OT/NT/APOCRYPHA?

Green Monster? 

Same as yours.

Oh yeah. Define "Gospel".

All have knowledge of God:  don't know.  Certainly St. Paul suggests we all have knowledge of right and wrong, and the natural world attests to his truth (but he doesn't say how)

All reject God:  all have sinned and fallen short. I suppose sinning does contain a rejection of God, if you know Him at least.

All are guilty:  yes, all have sinned and fallen short.

All are condemned for rejecting God:  I don't know.  I prefer things that are specifically Biblically based, so I know it's right.  As in:  No one comes to the Father but by Jesus Christ.  All have sinned.  But I'll admit, if it's phrased as "All are condemned for being sinful," this is how I interpret it

God has made a way of salvation for the lost:  For God so loved the world that he sent his only begotten son, that whosoever believes on him shall not perish, but have everlasting life.

People cannot come to God except by faith in Jesus:  Jesus is the way; no one comes to the Father but by him. 

Christ commands the church to preach the gospel to every creature:  yes, that's Acts 1, as I recall.

So:  yes.  Mostly Biblically verifiable.  I don't know about the "all know God" thing.

All people have knowledge of God

Know of the concepts presented of god(s), possibly. Know god - undefined, but I suspect false. One perspective, how does one know something which does not exist? (again aside from understanding a human idea presented about god. The difference between being told about your Uncle Jake, and having actually met him, with the possibility that your mother made up Uncle Jake for reasons unknown to you). 


All people reject God

Undefined. Reject how? Disbelief seems clearly false, the majority of people do not reject god.


All people are guilty before God

Requires an acceptance of the assertions that God exists (and in particular your God), and that your book is correct about his nature, and his expectations for us. 

Ultimately - I object to most of these because they require an acceptance of some a core premises that cannot be verified or tested before we can accept the rest of the principle statement (e.g. we must agree that God exists, it is a god we know, and that the bible accurately presents what he expects and wants us to do). 

Even the statement: Christ commands the church to make the gospel known to all peoples - cannot be rigorously defended. At best we can say, "the Bible tells us that Christ commands the church to make the gospel known to all peoples." We cannot know if Christ actually did command it. 

the bible accurately presents what he expects and wants us to do).

Are we allowing the idea that Christians have properly interpreted the Bible?

Being generous. But that's another complication, to be sure.

Definitions for Shane:

Gospel: The synoptic gospels and John - acts 1:8 (be witnesses)

Lost: Condemned, excluded from the kingdom of heaven.

Salvation: Redemption, as in an ancient Israeli Kinsman Redeemer, as in Boaz

Way: a course of action that if a person chooses to take and execute, leads to something.... in the use by this author a way to salvation, as in faith in Jesus as the Redeemer.

Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel (good news).

~Mark 1

 

Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

~Luke 17

Redemption was easy.  Spelled out rather explicitly.  Not sure where you're going with that.

never figured you to be one to needle around with word definitions so much in a conversation about ideas

Need to define terms or else argue in circles.  It's rather pointless to go about arguing when we actually agree because we're using words in different ways.

Question for Shane:

People cannot come to God except through Christ -  you say it's false..... I can see the logic behind that assertion.... We know Moses, Elijah, Abraham, make it to heaven - did they make it through Christ?

RSS

Latest Activity

Herb Munson replied to Herb Munson's discussion The Primacy and Existence of God in the group The Great Debate
"The proof of the pudding is in the eating. I would examine your life, words, works and power ... then, if ... though you were sinless... I saw you die on a cross for my sins ... I would consider it."
8 minutes ago
JonEdanger replied to Herb Munson's discussion The Primacy and Existence of God in the group The Great Debate
"You might end up serving Koolaid in Shieldstown, Guyana"
9 minutes ago
Sheepdog updated their profile
12 minutes ago
LShieldes replied to Herb Munson's discussion The Primacy and Existence of God in the group The Great Debate
"But what if I am claiming that I am also a God?"
21 minutes ago
StaggerLee replied to Liam's discussion Is it possible to beat addiction? in the group The Great Debate
"That is a tricky issue. I would guess that you were never addicted to begin with, but certainly may be wrong. Hard to know and risky to assume from a four sentence post. Sorry if I did get it wrong! It is possible to do something for long periods…"
59 minutes ago
RICHARD T. ANDREWS posted photos
1 hour ago
RICHARD T. ANDREWS posted a status
"1921-1928 GILLETTE "OLD TYPE" SAFETY RAZOR w CASE http://www.ioffer.com/selling/rickcaron2008"
1 hour ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Clinton R. Ausmus's discussion Shave of the Day - June Edition in the group Wet Shaving (No Spam!)
"Wednesday, June 19th Prep: Hot Shower/Nivea Energy Face Scrub Cream: Kiss My Face Key Lime Bowl: LE TSN Bill Bowl Brush: WSP Prince - Finest Razor: Schick Krona Blade: Red Personna (3) Post: RazoRock Alum/Cold Water/Witch Hazel A/S: Proraso Reslult:…"
1 hour ago

© 2013   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service