I'm thoroughly enjoying reading Radical, by David Platt. It for me has been my favorite kinds of books - the kind that changes my attitude towards the subject it addresses, which in this case is evangelism.
The author asserts seven truths I'd be delighted for anyone to join in discussing. They are:
Obviously, these truths are milestones that if a person agrees with, pass through salvation and into evangelism.
This conversation would probably be more appropriate for the Apologetics group, but frankly there's not much traffic there. I'd be particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who disagree with one of the truths..... Atheists, Agnostics, and people of all religious stripes are welcome to comment, I only ask that the conversation be respectful.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Shane on July 23, 2012 at 7:48pm All people have knowledge of God
Biblically false.
All people reject God
Objectively false.
All people are guilty before God
Christian concept, not inherent to the overall biblical theology.
All people are condemned for rejecting God
Christian concept, not inherent to the overall biblical theology.
God has made a way of Salvation for the lost.
Define "Lost". Define "Salvation". Define "Way".
People cannot come to God apart from faith in Christ
Biblically false.
Christ commands the church to make the gospel known to all peoples
Yes, but; no conversion is required for salvation.
Permalink Reply by John Muir on July 25, 2012 at 6:42pm Before I can reply, I would have to know what your definition of the word Bible is.....
Torah?
OT?
OT/NT?
OT/NT/APOCRYPHA?
Green Monster?
Permalink Reply by Will on July 23, 2012 at 10:39pm All have knowledge of God: don't know. Certainly St. Paul suggests we all have knowledge of right and wrong, and the natural world attests to his truth (but he doesn't say how)
All reject God: all have sinned and fallen short. I suppose sinning does contain a rejection of God, if you know Him at least.
All are guilty: yes, all have sinned and fallen short.
All are condemned for rejecting God: I don't know. I prefer things that are specifically Biblically based, so I know it's right. As in: No one comes to the Father but by Jesus Christ. All have sinned. But I'll admit, if it's phrased as "All are condemned for being sinful," this is how I interpret it
God has made a way of salvation for the lost: For God so loved the world that he sent his only begotten son, that whosoever believes on him shall not perish, but have everlasting life.
People cannot come to God except by faith in Jesus: Jesus is the way; no one comes to the Father but by him.
Christ commands the church to preach the gospel to every creature: yes, that's Acts 1, as I recall.
So: yes. Mostly Biblically verifiable. I don't know about the "all know God" thing.
Permalink Reply by Liam S. on July 26, 2012 at 1:32am All people have knowledge of God
Know of the concepts presented of god(s), possibly. Know god - undefined, but I suspect false. One perspective, how does one know something which does not exist? (again aside from understanding a human idea presented about god. The difference between being told about your Uncle Jake, and having actually met him, with the possibility that your mother made up Uncle Jake for reasons unknown to you).
All people reject God
Undefined. Reject how? Disbelief seems clearly false, the majority of people do not reject god.
All people are guilty before God
Requires an acceptance of the assertions that God exists (and in particular your God), and that your book is correct about his nature, and his expectations for us.
Ultimately - I object to most of these because they require an acceptance of some a core premises that cannot be verified or tested before we can accept the rest of the principle statement (e.g. we must agree that God exists, it is a god we know, and that the bible accurately presents what he expects and wants us to do).
Even the statement: Christ commands the church to make the gospel known to all peoples - cannot be rigorously defended. At best we can say, "the Bible tells us that Christ commands the church to make the gospel known to all peoples." We cannot know if Christ actually did command it.
Permalink Reply by Shane on July 26, 2012 at 5:35am the bible accurately presents what he expects and wants us to do).
Are we allowing the idea that Christians have properly interpreted the Bible?
Permalink Reply by Liam S. on July 26, 2012 at 9:00am Being generous. But that's another complication, to be sure.
Permalink Reply by John Muir on July 26, 2012 at 5:46pm Definitions for Shane:
Gospel: The synoptic gospels and John - acts 1:8 (be witnesses)
Lost: Condemned, excluded from the kingdom of heaven.
Salvation: Redemption, as in an ancient Israeli Kinsman Redeemer, as in Boaz
Way: a course of action that if a person chooses to take and execute, leads to something.... in the use by this author a way to salvation, as in faith in Jesus as the Redeemer.
Permalink Reply by Shane on July 26, 2012 at 7:08pm Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel (good news).
~Mark 1
Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
~Luke 17
Redemption was easy. Spelled out rather explicitly. Not sure where you're going with that.
Permalink Reply by John Muir on July 27, 2012 at 1:29pm never figured you to be one to needle around with word definitions so much in a conversation about ideas
Permalink Reply by Shane on July 27, 2012 at 1:39pm Need to define terms or else argue in circles. It's rather pointless to go about arguing when we actually agree because we're using words in different ways.
Herb Munson replied to Herb Munson's discussion The Primacy and Existence of God in the group The Great Debate
JonEdanger replied to Herb Munson's discussion The Primacy and Existence of God in the group The Great Debate
StaggerLee replied to Liam's discussion Is it possible to beat addiction? in the group The Great Debate
RICHARD T. ANDREWS posted a status
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Clinton R. Ausmus's discussion Shave of the Day - June Edition in the group Wet Shaving (No Spam!)
© 2013 Created by Brett McKay.
Powered by