I'm a relatively newly converted Christian, who converted after his own philosophical musings and his own religious experiences. As of right now, I'm non-denominational. I attend a church services, and enjoy them, but I wanted more information regarding denominations.


Firstly, I have an acute distaste for contemporary service. I'm fine with the sermons, but my ears cannot take Christian Rock. There's no real reason, it's always been that way for me. On the other side though, I have little patience with fear-monger theology, of which there is plenty in my small town. I'm tolerant of most any opinion, but I refuse to believe that the first reason I should accept Jesus is to save myself from Hell.


That said, one can see my dilemna. I'm searching for an old-fashion, shine-your-shoes, sing-your-hymns-with-an-organ church, but one that preaches the love of God and of Jesus with a mature, open mind.


Now, I'm certainly not trying to come off as "picky" with my church; I'm happy most anywhere. I'm just curious if there are any more tradition oriented churches alive in America today. Thanks!



Views: 387

Replies to This Discussion

I'm not sure I *do* see the dilemma.  There are a wealth of churches, surely, that don't do rock n' roll in the service and don't preach hellfire and brimstone.  Certainly in my city.

You like "tradition oriented"; what tradition?

I would suggest Primitive Baptist or Reform Presbyterian.

Neither church is happy-clappy. In fact, neither group uses musical instruments during worship.

The emphasis is on the Word and the Bible.

I get it actually.  Try a Catholic Church.

You won't find an Organ in an Orthodox Church, but the Orthodox believe openly that God is a god of love, peace, hope, and charity.  Jesus came not merely to save us from Hell, but primarily to make it so that we may become "partakers of the Divine Nature".  That we might become by grace that which He is by nature (loving, long-suffering, etc, all of the fruits of holiness).  You won't really find instruments, but what you WILL find is the pre-denominational Church of Jesus Christ, founded by Christ himself, the Church that has believed, taught, preserved, defended, and died for the Faith of the Apostles since the day of Pentecost.  Give it a shot, you might be pleasantly surprised at what you find.



Uhh - I beg to differ.  While the Orthodox (including Roman Catholics) may say that it is all about peace and love, they have had (and still have) a very long list of sins (even different levels of sins) the engagement in which  guarantees eternal damnation.  I have never heard of this list being updated (except for the Fish on Friday deal, which caused many Catholics with whom I spoke  to wonder, the Pope being infallible and all, that is, all those folks in years past who went directly to Purgatory or Hell for eating fish, exactly what happened to them all on the day the other Pope granted them clemency?  Did some angel show up in Purgatory and tell them that there had been a change in "policy" and now they were free?)

Oh, and what about divorced folk and taking communion?  Sticky one, that.  Oh, yes, and "lay" ministers?  And who gets to give you communion when you're in the hospital (when only a Priest can give communion)?  And contraception?  And abortion?  And re-marriage in the church?  To say nothing about celibacy, a doctrine that does not appear in the Bible and which was originally instituted by some Pope in the 1100's because Priests who were lawfully married were leaving Church property to their children.  It had nothing to do with sex, or devotion.  Did it?  You see, Orthodox religions are just too filled with contradictions that belie peace and love.

Orthodox comes from Byzantium, not Rome.  They have no Pope.

Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism have the same roots, having each originated as a result of the Great Schism of the 1140's.  While this Schism was, to some extent, based on doctrinal differences, in actuality it was over the division of power and the undisputed authority of the church of Rome.  Essentially, although there have been many variations over time (and geographically and culturally), the basic doctrines of the various faiths remain the same.  For instance, Roman orthodoxy favors the worship through statues of saints, whereas Greek orthodoxy does so through pictures called "icons".  There really is little difference in the basic belief that long dead humans can intervene in favor of the living, stemming from the erroneous and un-Biblical belief in the immortality of the soul.  (Ezekiel 18:4, et al.)  There are various other basic similarities regarding the trinity, communion, salvation, the necesssity for a clergy-laity distinction, and the existence of Prelates (or patriarchs) rather than in favor of a single Pope.  And so on, and so on.


That wasn't your argument.
You are right. My point was simply that it is not sufficient merely to find a church with which one is "comfortable."  Neither is it sufficient to choose a church because it seems to support "peace, love, hope and charity".  It is, rather, important to look for a church that supports Biblical teachings because the Bible is God's word and the standard for all - not in some philosophical sense, but in "deed and truth".  (1 John)  That is why doctrine is so important.

stated as if a church that "supports Biblical teachings" is one that makes one uncomfortable, and is about discord, hate, despair, and selfishness.


I have been to church with as many different denominations as you can think of and I have yet be in one that does not teach from the Bible.  Whatever your degree of agreement with whatever theological sticking points there may be; one should not have to sit through a rousing rendition of Jehovah-Jireh during the the singing portion if one does not like it.


The OP was simply looking for a more traditional setting to come together in the body of Christ.  We have replied with various denominations which he may try, both Protestant and Catholic (to include the Orthodox).


As to your speaking out of turn with a distinct lack of knowledge on a subject, it's astounding.  You don't usually do that.

Your posts are factually inaccurate regarding Orthodoxy to the point I am not even going to dignify them with a point-by-point correction.  Do more research and get back to me.


Latest Activity

Rahul Roy joined Shane Belin's group

Men of Science

Men of Science is a group for students, teachers, and admirers of science and exploration.See More
5 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Logan Van Osdol's discussion Introduction
"Welcome. There's a lot of men to learn from here. Not your average troll-ridden teenybopper forum. Hope you enjoy it."
11 minutes ago
Logan Van Osdol posted a discussion


Hey everybody, I  had no idea these forums existed till just a few days ago. I've been reading articles and have listening to the podcast for about a year. I'm sixteen, born and raised in the US of A, i'm a junior in high school, I play football, I hunt and fish. See More
14 minutes ago
Pale Horse commented on Pedro Angel Serrano's photo

Hygiene: WW II

"Looks like he's grooming his associate."
16 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to jaya jagannath das's discussion Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
"Lol! Enough with your dry talking, rascal dog!"
26 minutes ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to James B.'s discussion Just got a girl's number, need some advice
"You call her and talk and then make plans. NO TEXTING."
27 minutes ago
Jason replied to Peter Amara's discussion Shirt Style at Work in the group The Shirtless Man
"V-neck under shirt or T-shirt and top two buttons unbottoned if I'm wearing a button up. If it's a Polo an A -shirt and all buttons unbottoned.  "
29 minutes ago
Profile IconRahul Roy and Fernando joined Steven C.'s group


Exercise is a crucial part of maintaining a manly physique. Join up to share ideas, get support and discuss plans with other men.See More
32 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service