Can a spiritually unawakened man truly master the art of manliness?!

Personally, I think the root of being a manly man is to have pure morals. Morals, however, have to come outside of this space-time continium. They are given by a pure loving God, thus, Morals are a reflection of Him, making them pure unchangable constant.
The questions thats arise are:
Can a man adopt them, practise them, and yet be disconected from God?
Will that behavior be genuine?
Will he feel compeled to live by Godly given high morals, without coming to Christ
first?

I have my answer, but I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Maybe we can help clarify why this is not possible, simply because many people need to feel God's peace and mastering the Art of Manliness is the fruit from all that.

Views: 103

Replies to This Discussion

Well... Genghis Khan was manly, and was a monster.  In fact, without some of the virtues we associate with manliness (leadership, perseverance), no one can be an effective monster:  you have to have drive and efficiency to work great evil as well as to work great good.

So:  an unregenerate, horrific monster can be manly.  Just not the kind of manly we need.

In my opinion, being manly is a mostly amoral question. You're either good at being a man, or you're not. It's more about capability, strength, courage, respect, etc. Whether you're a 'good man' is a separate question.

Reducing things to fiction, for simplicity, it's not hard to think of loosely moral, amoral, or outright immoral characters that are unquestionably 'manly'. Darth Vader. Walter White. James Bond. Bruce Wayne. Michael Corleone. Sherlock Holmes. Tyler Durden. Dirty Harry.

Historically, there's everybody from Blackbeard to John Dillinger to Wyatt Earp.
Biblically, there are a lot of really messed-up characters that are considered manly. David ... the king who sent a soldier to die in battle so he could bang his wife. Yikes.

I agree with you that morality is static, objective, constant, and of God. I don't think men can be moral without God ... and, I don't think truly "pure morals" are possibility for any man, save one, on this side of eternity. Total depravity.

But, I don't think pure morals are a prerequisite to manliness. And, I don't think there's really a Biblical case to make for it, either. Christ was the model. But, there are a lot of paragons throughout the Bible that failed. Repeatedly. Spectacularly. And were still not only men ... but men of God.

JB

Personally, I think the root of being a manly man is to have pure morals.

I disagree with this. I agree with Jack. He's explained good man VS good at being a man several times on AoM and I agree with his interpretation.

Morals, however, have to come outside of this space-time continium. They are given by a pure loving God,

I agree that morals can come from religion but I disagree that they can only come from religion.


Can a man adopt them, practise them, and yet be disconected from God?

Yes. A person can be good and moral but not believe at all or believe in something other than the Christian god. The current Pope of the Roma Catholic Church has been clear: good atheists are good people. He's also implied that it's better to be a good atheist than a bad, hypocritical Catholic. (I know he doesn't represent all of Christianity but it nonetheless says volumes.)

Will that behavior be genuine?

It will if they have genuinely good, altruistic intentions.


Will he feel compeled to live by Godly given high morals, without coming to Christ
first?

Not necessarily. There are plenty of people who are compelled to do good and live moral lives without believing in any deity, or while believing in something other than the Christian God.

Some caveats.  God is not a religion.  This makes a difference.  Religion didn't and couldn't create the universe, construct us to have a moral sense, send a Son to save us, etc.  So when we ask whether morals come from God, that's a separate question of whether they come from a religion.

I don't think they come exactly, or only, from outside the universe.  At least, "the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse."  That is, sure, ultimately it comes from God like everything else.

This may also have an effect on the question of being moral but godless.  You can be alive but godless, though life comes from God.  But it may not be a stable situation.  (Or maybe there's a reason morality is more dependent than life is.)

"Some caveats.  God is not a religion.  This makes a difference.  Religion didn't and couldn't create the universe, construct us to have a moral sense, send a Son to save us, etc.  So when we ask whether morals come from God, that's a separate question of whether they come from a religion."

Understood. I was using the term to refer to any/all gods, deities and/or supernatural beings and concepts generally rather than God, the god of the Christians, specifically.

"This may also have an effect on the question of being moral but godless.  You can be alive but godless, though life comes from God.  But it may not be a stable situation.  (Or maybe there's a reason morality is more dependent than life is.)"

Brings up a few interesting questions. Can one be alive and/or moral but godless?  Can one be alive and/or moral and simply not be aware that they are with god?

This thread went places.

This is tricky, indeed.  In your premise, you condemn all non-Christian men into a limbo of immorality, at worst, and amorality, at best.

If morality is strictly defined in Christian terms, then nobody other than Christians can be moral.  If, however, morality is expressed and defined by behavior, then multitudes of men, including those who think they are Christians, but may not actually be Christians, are quite capable of truly moral behavior from a genuine, manly desire.

Is Christianity only a system of morality?  I was raised in a church which certainly believed that.

RSS

Latest Activity

Lionheart commented on Stephen Larsen's group Banya Men!
"Hoping to hit the sauna next week in Dallas. Could use a relaxing spa day. Anyone care to join an AoM brother there?"
49 minutes ago
David R. commented on Shane Belin's group Pennsylvania
"Comment by David R. 1 second ago Delete Comment I'm looking for a quality 4"x6" desk size Pa. flag.  I ordered one from an online company but when it arrived, you simply could not see the coat of arms because it is printed so…"
3 hours ago
Nature of a Man replied to Nature of a Man's discussion A bizarre dating trend I see
"For example, it wasn't so long ago that the well-off married essentially for political and business reasons. Their partners were spouses for the purposes of appearances and to produce offspring but the partners led very separate lives, often…"
5 hours ago
Kit the Odd replied to Xenias Latin's discussion New Leadership Question
"I agree that this sounds more like a management issue than a leadership issue.  I don't really have any good suggestions for management training books. As for leadership, look up the US Army leadership manuals.  ADP 6-22 and ADRP…"
7 hours ago
David R. added a discussion to the group Comedy!
Thumbnail

I know, I know...

I know, I know, I've got a dirty mind sometimes.  But here goes anyway.I passed by the sign in front of a local gym that was promoting how much weight their members had lost.  I saw "Congratulations, Bob Smith!  He lost 75 pounds and 19 inches!"How many men would like to lose "19 inches"?!  Comments?See More
9 hours ago
Jay D replied to J. Exalto's discussion Globalism in the group The Great Debate
"We are discussing two things here. 1. Globalism actually brought as huge relative wealth since the average western household now can afford things that were liited to the aristocracy just 100 years ago. Have you laundry done, babysitters, maids,…"
9 hours ago
Jay D replied to J. Exalto's discussion Globalism in the group The Great Debate
"I agree and being able to patent f.e. new drug recipes is very important for innovation, since there is a lot of money invested. But there are also many areas were patents kill innovation and competition, since they grant a quasi monopoly for…"
10 hours ago
Dal updated their profile
10 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service